The theory of requiredness, which is similar to the information-theoretic concept of subjective (un)certainty, is applied to the problem of measuring the effectiveness of promotional material. This theory specifies that, in the case of a complex passage of prose, high levels of predictability will lead to high levels of enjoyment and recall for that passage. It is also hypothesized that enjoyable passages will be more memorable than unenjoyable passages. In order to test this theory of requiredness, a model is estimated using 109 subjects, and predictions are made to a validation sample of forty-seven. The moderately successful prediction results provide empirical support for all three hypotheses derived from this theory of aesthetics. Implications for promotional managers and scientific researchers are also discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WallendorfM.ZinkhanG., and ZinkhanL. S., Cognitive Complexity and Aesthetic Preference, in Consumer Esthetics and Symbolic Consumption, HolbrookM. B. and HirschmanE. (eds.), Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, 1980.
2.
BartosR., Ads That Irritate May Erode Trust in Advertised Brands, Harvard Business Review, pp. 138–140, 1981.
3.
HolbrookM. B. and LehmannD. R., Form versus Content in Predicting Starch Scores, Journal of Advertising Research, 20, pp. 53–62, 1980.
4.
HaskinsJ. B., Factual Recall as a Measure of Advertising Effectiveness, Journal of Advertising Research, 4:1, pp. 2–8, 1964.
5.
ClaycampH. J. and LiddyL. E., Prediction of New Product Performance: An Analytical Approach, Journal of Marketing Research, 6, pp. 414–420, 1969.
6.
ShimpT., Attitude Toward the Advertisement as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice, Journal of Advertising, 10:2, pp. 9–15, 1981.
7.
HanssensD. M. and WeitzB. A., The Effectiveness of Industrial Print Advertisements across Product Categories, Journal of Marketing Research, 17, pp. 294–306, 1980.
8.
RossiterJ. R. and PercyL., Attitude Change Through Visual Imagery in Advertising, Journal of Advertising, 9, pp. 10–16, 1980.
9.
HolbrookM. B., Some Further Dimensions of Psycholinguistics, Imagery, and Consumer Response, in Advances in Consumer Research, IX, MitchellA. (ed.), pp. 112–117, 1981.
10.
BookA. and CaryN., The Television Commercial, Crain, Chicago, 1970.
11.
AndersonR. E. and JolsonM. A., Technical Wording in Advertising: Implications for Market Segmentation, Journal of Marketing, 44, pp. 57–66, 1980.
12.
OlsonJ. C., What is an Esthetic Response?, in Consumer Esthetics and Symbolic Consumption, HolbrookM. B. and HirschmanElizabeth (eds.), Association for Consumer Research, Ann Arbor, 1980.
13.
SchankR. L. and AbelsonR. P., Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding, Erlbaum, Hillsdale, N.J., 1977.
14.
ZinkhanG. M. and MartinC. R., Two Copy Testing Techniques: The Cloze Procedure and the Cognitive Complexity Test, Journal of Business Research, 11, pp. 217–228, 1983.
15.
TaylorW. L., Cloze Procedure: A New Tool for Measuring Readability, Journalism Quarterly, 30, pp. 415–433, 1953.
16.
AldersonJ. C., The Effect on the Cloze Test of Changes in Deletion Frequency, Journal of Research in Reading, 2:2, pp. 108–119, 1979.
17.
HolbrookM. B., A Study of Communication in Advertising, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University, 1975.
18.
BerlyneD. E., Conflict Arousal and Curiosity, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1960.
19.
BerlyneD. E., The Motivational Significance of Collative Variables and Conflict, pp. 257–266, 1968.
20.
MillerG. A., Language and Communication, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1951.
21.
WalkerE. L., Psychological Complexity and Preference: A Hedgehog Theory of Behavior, in Pleasure, Reward, Preference, BerlyneD. E. and MadsenK. B. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, 1973.
22.
TaylorW. L., Recent Developments in the Use of ‘Cloze Procedure,’Journalism Quarterly, 33, pp. 42–48, 99, 1956.
23.
CraikF. I. M. and LockhartR. S., Levels of Processing: A Framework for Memory Research, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11, pp. 671–684, 1972.
24.
BurgoonJ. K.BurgoonM., and WilkinsonM., Writing Style as a Predictor of Newspaper Readership, Satisfaction and Image, Journalism Quarterly, 58, pp. 225–231, 1981.
25.
BartlettF. C., Remembering: A Study in Experimental and Social Psychology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1932.
26.
MitchellA. A. and OlsonJ. C., Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?, Journal of Marketing Research, 18, pp. 318–332, 1981.
27.
LambM. M. and HughesE. H., Business Letters, Memorandums, and Reports, Harper and Row, New York, 1976.
