Do Male Students Often Perform Better Than Female Students When Learning Computers?: A Study of Taiwanese Eighth Graders' Computer Education through Strategic and Cooperative Learning
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online January, 2002
Do Male Students Often Perform Better Than Female Students When Learning Computers?: A Study of Taiwanese Eighth Graders' Computer Education through Strategic and Cooperative Learning
This study investigated the impacts of strategic learning, cooperative learning, and their combination on junior high school students' computer achievement, attitudes, and anxiety. A total of 155 Taiwanese eighth graders participated in this study. Regarding computer achievement, a significant interaction was found between gender and learning context. No significant difference was found in students' computer attitudes due to either learning context or gender factor. With respect to computer anxiety, however, the boys exhibited a significantly higher level than did the girls. Students' computer anxiety in the cooperative learning group was also significantly higher than that in the control group. It is believed that the culture of socialization involving computers plays an important role in junior high school computer classrooms. In addition, strategic learning is regarded as an effective approach to promote female students' learning with computers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York: Oxford University.
2.
BloomB. S.EnglehartM. B.FurstE. J.HillW. H., & KrathwohiO. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. New York: Longman.
3.
BrosnanM., & LeeW. (1998). A cross-cultural comparison of gender differences in computer attitudes and anxieties: The United Kingdom and Hong Kong. Computers in Human Behavior, 14(4), 559–577.
4.
ChiouG. F., & WuC. C. (1996). A computer curriculum guideline for junior high school in Taiwan: Its impacts and issues. Paper presented in National Educational Computing Conference, Minneapolis, MN.
5.
CleggS. C., & TrayhurnD. (1999). Gender and computing: Not the same old problem. British Educational Research Journal, 26(1), 75–89.
6.
ColleyA. M.GaleM. T., & HarrisT. A. (1994). Effects of gender-role identity and experience oncomputer attitude components. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(2), 129–137.
DyckJ. L., & SmitherJ. A. (1994), Age-differences in computer anxiety—The role of computer experience, gender and education. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(3), 239–248.
9.
FrancisL. J. (1994). The relationship between computer-related attitudes and gender stereotyping or computer use. Computers & Education, 22(4), 283–289.
10.
HeinssenR. K.GlassC. R.KnightL. A. (1987). Assessing computer anxiety: Development and validation of the Computer Anxiety Rating Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 3, 49–59.
11.
HouleP. A. (1996). Toward understanding student differences in a computer skill course. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14(1), 25–48.
12.
International Technology Education Association (1996). Technology for all Americans: A rationale and structure for the study of technology. Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.
13.
JohnsonD. W., & JohnsonR. T. (1994). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (4th ed.). Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
14.
JohnsonD. W.JohnsonR. T., & SmithK. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the college classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
15.
KadijevichD. (2000). Gender differences in computer attitude among ninth-grade students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(2), 145–154.
16.
KeelerC. M., & AnsonR. (1995). An assessment of cooperative learning used for basic computer skills instruction in the college classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12(4), 379–393.
17.
KingA. (1994). Guiding knowledge construction in the classroom: Effects of teaching children how to question and how to explain. American Educational Research Journal, 31(2), 338–368.
18.
LevinT., & GordonC. (1989). Effect of gender and computer experience on attitudes toward computers. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5(1), 69–88.
19.
MarcoulidesG. A. (1988). The relationship between computer anxiety and computer achievement. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), 151–157.
20.
McInerneyV.McInerneyD. M., & MarshH. W. (1997). Effects of metacognitive strategy training within a cooperative learning context on computer achievement and anxiety: An aptitude-treatment interaction study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 686–695.
21.
McInerneyV.McInerneyD. M., & SinclairK. E. (1994). Student teachers, computer anxiety and computer experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11(1), 27–50.
22.
Ministry of Education (1994). The Standard for junior high school computer curriculum. Taiwan: Ministry of Education (in Chinese).
23.
MitraA.LenzmeierS.AvonR.QuN., & HazenM. (2000). Gender and computer-use in an academic institution: Report from a longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 23(1), 67–84.
24.
Naveh-BenjaminM. (1991). A comparison of training programs intended for different types of test-anxious students: Further support for an information processing model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 134–139.
25.
NickellG. S., & PintoJ. N. (1986). The Computer Attitude Scale. Computers in Human Behavior, 2, 301–306.
26.
O'DonnellA. M.DansereauD. F.HallR. H., & RocklinT. R. (1987). Cooperative, social/affective, and metacognitive outcomes of scripted cooperative learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 431–437.
27.
ParisS. G., & WinogradP. (1990). How metacognition can promote academic learning and instruction. In JonesB. F. & IdolL. (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 15–51). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28.
Pre-College Task Force Committee of the Education Board of the Association for Computing Machinery (1993). The Association for Computing Machinery model high school computer science curriculum. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36(5), 87–90.
RogerA., & DuffieldJ. (2000). Factors underlying persistent gendered option choices in school science and technology in Scotland. Gender and Education, 12(3), 367–384.
31.
RosenshineB.MeisterC., & ChapmanS. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the interaction studies. Research of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–221.
32.
SimonsonM. R.MaurerM.Montag-TorardiM., & WhitakerM. (1987). Development of a standardized test of computer literacy and a computer anxiety index. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 3(2), 231–247.
33.
SlavinR. E. (1995). Cooperative learning: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
34.
SolowayE. (1993). Should we teach students to program?Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery, 36(10), 21–24.
35.
TsaiC.-C.LinS. S. J., & YuanS.-M. (2001). Science students' performance and use on a www-based concept map testing system, with relations to motivation and learning strategies. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(1), 72–84.
36.
TsaiM.-J., & BethelL. J. (1999). Strategic learning strategies for higher computer achievement, better computer attitudes, and less computer anxiety. Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Education of Teachers in Science, Austin, TX.
37.
TurkJ., & WileyS. J. (1997). Teaching social and ethical issues in the literacy course. The Association for Computing Machinery Special Interest Group in Computer Science Education Bulletin, 29(1), 10–14.
38.
TurnerG. M.SweanyN. W., & HusmanJ. (2000). Development of the computer interface measure. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 22(1), 37–54.
39.
WeinsteinC. E. (1994). Strategic learning/strategic teaching: Flip sides of a coin. In PrintrichP. R.BrownD. R., & WeinsteinC. E. (Eds.), Student motivation, cognition, and learning: Essays in honor of Wilbert J. McKeachie. (pp. 257–273). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
40.
WeinsteinC. E.MeyerD. K., & StoneG. V. M. (1994). Teaching students how to learn. In McKeachieW. J.ChismN.MengesR.SvinickiM. & WeinsteinC. E. (Eds.), Teaching tips (9th ed., pp. 359–367). Lexington, Toronto: D. C. Heath and Company.
41.
WeinsteinC. E., & PalmerD. R. (1990). Learning and study strategies inventory—High school version. Florida: H & H Publishing Company, Inc.
