An Empirical Examination of the Anomie Theory of Drug Use

Abstract

The purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between anomie theory, as measured by Srole's Anomie Scale, and the respondents self-admitted drug use (alcohol, marijuana, tobacco, amphetamines, and barbiturates). An analysis of self-reported drug use data was conducted of a general Texas adult population. This analysis included a series of bivariate cross comparison correlations between the independent variable (anomie) and the dependent drug variables. The relationship between the independent and dependent variables were further examined by calculating the correlation and level of significance within selected categories of several demographic (age, race, sex, education, income, and marital status) control variables. The results indicated that anomie was significantly correlated with several of the drug variables. However, these associations were extremely weak and of little explanatory value. It was concluded that, within the framework of this analysis, anomie theory fails to provide an adequate explanation for the use of drugs.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Durkheim

, Suicide: A Study in Sociology, translated by Spaulding

J. A.

and Simpson

Simpson

(ed.), The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1951.

Cohen

, The Sociology of the Defiant Act, Anomie Theory and Beyond, American Sociological Review, 30, pp. 5–14, 1965.

Merton

R. K.

, Social Structure and Anomie, American Sociological Review, 3: 5, pp. 672–682, 1938.

Thio

, A Critical Look at Merton's Anomie Theory, Pacific Sociological Review, 18: 2, pp. 139–157, April 1975.

Clinard

M. B.

and Meier

R. F.

, Sociology of Deviant Behavior, 5th Edition, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1979.

Lindesmith

A. R.

and Gagnon

J. H.

, Anomie and Drug Addiction, Anomie and Deviant Behavior, Clinard

M. B.

(ed.), The Free Press, New York, 1964.

Cloward

R. A.

and Ohlin

L. E.

, Delinquency and Opportunity: A Theory of Delinquency Gangs, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1960.

Akers

R. L.

, Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach, 2nd Edition, Wadsworth Publishing Company, Belmont, California, 1977.

Srole

, Social Integration and Certain Corollaries: An Explanatory Study, American Sociological Review, 21, pp. 709–716, December 1956.

10.

Costner

H. L.

, Criteria for Measures of Association, American Sociological Review, 30, pp. 341–353, 1965.

11.

Kercher

G. A.

and Dull

R. T.

, Texas Crime Poll, 1981, Survey Research Program, Criminal Justice Center, Huntsville, Texas, 1981.

12.

Fishburn

Abelson

, and Cisin

, National Survey on Drug Abuse: Main Findings: 1979, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1979.

13.

Robinson

J. P.

and Shauer

P. R.

, Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes, Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1973.

14.

Bonjean

Hill

, and McLemore

, Sociological Measurement, Chandler, San Francisco, California, 1967.

15.

Streuning

and Richardson

, A Factor Analytic Exploration of the Alienation, Anomia, and Authoritarianism Domain, American Sociological Review, 30, pp. 768–776, 1965.

16.

Miller

and Butler

, Anomia and Eunomia: A Methodological Evaluation of Srole's Anomia Scale, American Sociological Review, 31, pp. 400–405, 1966.

17.

Bell

Anomia , Social Isolation and Class Structure, Sociometry, 20, pp. 105–116, 1957.

18.

National Commission on Marijuana and Drug Abuse, Marijuana: A Signal of Misunderstanding, Technical Papers of the First Report of the National Commission, U. S. Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1972.

19.

Labovitz

, Some Observations on Measurement and Statistics, Social Forces, 46: 2, pp. 151–160, 1967.

20.

Labovitz

, The Assignment of Numbers to Rank Order Categories, American Sociological Review, 35, pp. 515–524, 1970.

21.

Borgatta

E. F.

, My Student The Purist: A Lament, Sociological Quarterly, 9, pp. 29–34, 1968.

22.

Boyle

, Path Analyses and Ordinal Data, American Journal of Sociology, 75, pp. 461–480, January 1970.

23.

Bolen

K. A.

and Barb

K. H.

, Pearson's R and Coarsely Categorized Measures, American Sociological Review, 46, pp. 232–239, 1981.

24.

Akers

R. L.

Krohn

M. D.

Lanza-Kaduce

, and Radosevich

, Social Learning and Deviant Behavior: A Specific Test of a General Theory, American Sociological Review, 44, pp. 635–655, August 1979.

25.

Suits

, The Use of Dummy Variables in Regression Equation, Journal of the American Statistical Association, 52, pp. 548–551, 1957.

26.

Blalock

H. M.

, Social Statistics, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1972.

27.

Gillespie

M. W.

, Log-Linear Techniques and the Regression Analysis of Dummy Dependent Variables: Further Bases for Comparison, Sociological Methods and Research, 6: 1, pp. 103–122, 1977.

28.

Snyder

C. R.

, Inebriety, Alcoholism and Anomie, Anomie and Deviant Behavior, Clinard

M. B.

(ed.), The Free Press, New York, 1964.

29.

Johnson

B. D.

, Marijuana Users and Drug Subculture, Wiley, New York, 1973.

30.

Cahalan

, Problem Drinker, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 1970.

31.

Dull

R. T.

and Williams

F. P.

Marijuana , Alcohol and Tobacco: Reassessment of a Presumed Relationship, Journal of Drug Education, 11: 2, pp. 129–139, 1981.