Three questions stimulated by Erik Erikson's theory of generativity were addressed: 1) Is generativity associated with greater subjective well-being? 2) Are agency and communion additive or interactive predictors of generativity? 3) Does generativity play a distinct role during the midlife period? Among ninety-eight midlife adults, generativity was positively related to positive affectivity, satisfaction with life, and work satisfaction. Generativity was independently predicted by agentic (masculine) and communal (feminine) traits. Among fifty-eight young adults, generativity predicted positive affect at home. Generativity was independently predicted by agentic (power) and communal (love) interpersonal orientations. Using event-contingent recording of agentic and communal behavior at work, agency was a stronger predictor of generativity for young adult men, and communion was a stronger predictor for young adult women. The studies demonstrate that generativity has similar relations to agency and communion in young and midlife adults; however, generativity may be a stronger predictor of subjective well-being in midlife adults.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AikenL. S., & WestS. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2.
BaileyW. T. (1992). Psychosocial development in men: Generativity and involvement with young children. Psychological Reports, 71, 929–930.
3.
BaileyW. T. (1994). Psychosocial development in women: Generativity. Psychological Reports, 74, 286.
4.
BakanD. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in Western man.Boston: Beacon.
5.
BeckerE. (1973). The denial of death.New York: The Free Press.
6.
BrownK. W. & MoskowitzD. S. (1998). Dynamic stability of behavior. The rhythms of our interpersonal lives. Journal of Personality, 66, 105–134.
7.
CohenJ., & CohenP. (1983). Applied multiple regression: Correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences.Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
DienerE., & EmmonsR. A. (1984). The independence of positive and negative affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1105–1117.
10.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J., & GriffinS. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 49, 71–75.
11.
EdwardsV. J., & SpenceJ. T. (1987). Gender-related traits, stereotypes and schemata. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 146–154.
12.
EmmonsR. A., & DienerE. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89–97.
13.
EmmonsR. A., & StemmerichE. (1993, August). Generativity and power and intimacy strivings. Poster session presented at the 102nd annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Toronto, Ontario.
14.
EriksonE. H. (1950/1985). Childhood and society, New York: W. W. Norton.
15.
EriksonE. H. (1980a). On the generational cycle: An address. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 61, 213–224.
16.
EriksonE. H. (1982). The life cycle completed: A review.New York: W. W. Norton.
17.
FranzC. E.McClellandD. C., & WeinbergerJ. (1991). Childhood antecedents of conventional social accomplishment in midlife adults: A 36-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 586–595.
18.
HauberF. A., & BruininksR. H. (1986). Intrinsic and extrinsic job satisfaction among direct-care staff in residential facilities for mentally retarded people. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 46, 95–105.
19.
HelmreichR. L.SpenceJ. T., & WilhelmJ. A. (1981). A psychometric analysis of the Personal Attributes Questionnaire. Sex Roles, 7 (11), 1097–1108.
20.
KotreJ. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives.Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
21.
LarsenR. J., & DienerE. (1992). Promises and problems with the circumplex model of emotions. Review of Personality and Social Psychology, 13, 25–59.
22.
LenneyE. (1991). Sex roles: The measurement of masculinity, femininity, and androgyny. In RobinsonJ. P.ShaverP. R.WrightsmanL. S. (Eds.), Measures of personality and social psychological attitudes (pp. 573–660). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
23.
McAdamsD. P. (1988). Power, intimacy, and the life story.New York: The Guilford Press.
24.
McAdamsD. P., & de St. AubinE. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 1003–1015.
25.
McAdamsD. P.RuetzelK., & FoleyJ. M. (1986). Complexity and generativity at mid-life: Relations among social motives, ego development, and adults' plans for the future. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 800–807.
26.
McAdamsD. P.de St. AubinE., & LoganR. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8, 221–230.
27.
McAdamsD. P.DiamondA.de St. AubinE., & MansfieldE. (1997). Stories of commitment: The psychosocial construction of generative lives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 678–694.
28.
MoskowitzD. S. (1994). Cross-situational generality and the interpersonal circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 921–933.
29.
MoskowitzD. S., & CotéS. (1995). Do interpersonal traits predict affect: A comparison of three models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 915–924.
30.
MoskowitzD. S.SuhE. J., & DesaulniersJ. (1994). Situational influences on gender differences in agency and communion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, 753–761.
31.
OchseR., & PlugC. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson's theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 1240–1252.
32.
PetersonB. E., & StewartA. J. (1993). Generativity and social motives in young adults. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 186–198.
33.
RussellJ. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178.
34.
RyffC. D., & MigdalS. (1984). Intimacy and generativity: Self-perceived transitions. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 9, 470–481.
35.
SnareyJ.SonL.KuehneV. S.HauserS., & VaillantG. (1987). The role of parenting in men's psychosocial development: A longitudinal study of early adulthood infertility and midlife generativity. Developmental Psychology, 23, 593–603.
36.
SpenceJ. T., & HelmreichR. L. (1978). Masculinity and femininity: Their psychological dimensions, correlates, and antecedents.Austin: University of Texas Press.
37.
TermanL. M. (1925). Genetic studies of genius. Vol. 1. Mental and physical traits of a thousand gifted children.Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
38.
VaillantG. E., & VaillantC. O. (1990). Determinants and consequences of creativity in a cohort of gifted women. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 14, 607–616.
39.
Van de WaterD. A., & McAdamsD. P. (1989). Generativity and Erikson's “belief in the species.”Journal of Research in Personality, 23, 435–449.
40.
WatsonD., & ClarkL. A. (1991). The PANAS-X: Preliminary manual for the positive and negative affect schedule—Expanded form.Texas: Southern Methodist University.
41.
WeissD. J.DavisR. V.EnglandG. W., & LofquistL. H. (1967). Manual for the Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation, 22, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota.
42.
WigginsJ. S. (1991). Agency and communion as conceptual coordinates for the understanding and measurement of interpersonal behavior. In GroveW. M. & CicchettiD. (Eds.), Thinking clearly about psychology (pp. 89–113). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
43.
WigginsJ. S., & TrapnellP. D. (1996). A dyadic-interactional perspective on the five-factor model. In WigginsJ. S. (Ed.), The five-factor model of personality: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 88–162). New York: Guilford Press.
44.
WigginsJ. S.TrapnellP., & PhillipsN. (1988). Psychometric and geometric characteristics of the Revised Interpersonal Adjective scales (IAS-R). Multivariate Behavioral Research, 23, 517–530.
