A Generational Approach to Using Emoticons as Nonverbal Communication

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to help determine whether the use of emoticons in computer mediated communication (CMC) are truly nonverbal cues. A review of the literature revealed that the traditional nonverbal theorists failed to predict the future employment of nonverbal cues in electronic CMC. A variety of emoticons are then described including the traditional happy face ☺ and sad face ☺, numerous variations of faces employing keyboard keys, a number of abbreviations commonly in use, and FLAMING. Inasmuch as emoticons are presently in widespread though informal use, the problem of how and what business communication instructors should teach about emoticons is discussed. The conclusion reached is that of a generational recipient determinism. It is recommended that recipients who are Traditionalists (born before 1946) should not be sent e-mail with emoticons; those who are Baby Boomers (those born between 1946 and 1964) probably should not be sent e-mail with emoticons; those who are Generation Xers (those born between 1964 and 1980) may be sent e-mail with some of the more commonemoticons; and those who are termed Millenials (bornafter 1980 and coming of age after 2000) may be sent e-mail with generous use of emoticons.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Extejt

M. M.

, Teaching Students to Correspond Effectively Electronically, Business Communication Quarterly, 61: 2, pp. 57–67, 1998.

Hall

E. T.

, The Silent Language, Doubleday & Company, Greenwich, Connecticut, 1959.

Mehrabian

, Silent Messages, Wadsworth Publishing Co., Inc., Belmont, California, 1971.

Knapp

M. L.

, Nonverbal Communication in Human Interaction, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc., New York, 1972.

Ruesch

and Kees

, Nonverbal Communication: Notes on the Visual Perception of Human Relations, University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles, 1956.

Dance

F. E. X.

(ed.), Toward a Theory of Human Communication, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1967.

Rogers

E. M.

and Allbritton

M. M.

, Interaction Communication Technologies in Business Organizations, The Journal of Business Communication, 32: 2, pp. 177–195, April 1995.

Blackman

and Clevenger

, On-Line Computer Conferencing: Surrogates for Nonverbal Behavior, paper presented at the 40th International Communication Association Conference, Dublin, Ireland, June 1990.

Rutter

, Commuting by Telephone, Pergamon Press, New York, 1987.

10.

Ekman

, Unmasking the Face, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1975.

11.

Big O's Help Page, (2003). Available at http://community-2.webtv.net/Big()Y2K/BigOsHelpPage/page5,html.

12.

Robson

, BizOps Secrets, 2003. Available at http://www.allprobiszops.com.

13.

Carter

K. A.

, Type Me How You Feel: Quasi-Nonverbal Cues in Computer Mediated Communication, ETC, A Review of General Semantics, 60: 1, pp. 29–39, 2003.

14.

Collins

, Flaming: The Relationship between Social Context Cues and Uninhibited Verbal Behavior in Computer-Mediated Communication, 1992. Retrieved June 24, 2000 at http://emoderators.com/papers/flames.html.

15.

Walker

, Applying Distributed Learning Theory in Online Business Communication Courses, Business Communication Quarterly, 66: 2, pp. 55–67, 2003.

16.

Boone

L. E.

Kurtz

D. L.

, and Block

J. R.

, Contemporary Business Communication (2nd Edition), Prentice-Hall, Saddle River, New Jersey, 1997.

17.

Munter

Rogers

P. S.

, and Rymer

, Business e-mail: Guidelines for Users, Business Communication Quarterly, 66: 1, pp. 26–40, 2003.

18.

Lancaster

L. C.

and Stillman

, When Generations Collide, HarperCollins, New York, 2002.

19.

Howe

and Strauss

, Millennials Rising: The Next Great Generation, Vantage Books, New York, 2000.

20.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, Organizational Communication: A Practical Application in a Community College Setting, American Business Communication Association Bulletin, 41: 3, pp. 6–10, September 1978.

21.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, Communication Climate, Medical Group Management Journal, 28: 1, pp. 51–53, January-February 1981.

22.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, Non-Verbal Communication…, English Journal, 72: 2, p. 85, February 1983.

23.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, Junk Mail: A Form of Business Communication, Journal of Business Education, 59: 4, pp. 153–155, January 1984.

24.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, What Should Students Learn? Communication!, Marketing News, 26: 22, pp. 4, 22, October 26, 1992.

25.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, Improving Business Ethics through Application of the Sapir-Whorf-Korzybski Hypothesis in Business Communication Instruction, Journal of Education for Business, 69: 6, pp. 354–358, July/August 1994.

26.

Krohn

Franklin B.

, What Should Students Learn? Once Again, Communication, Marketing Educator, 13: 3, p. 2, Summer 1994.

27.

Krohn

Franklin B.

and Ahmed

, Improving Communication Skills of Hospitality Students through Faculty Development, Hospitality and Tourism Educator, 6: 2, pp. 35–37, 1994.

28.

Krohn

Franklin B.

and Waller

M. E.

, Differences in Attitudes of Student and Professional American Marketing Association Members: A Potential Communication Problem, College Student Journal, 24: 1, pp. 49–56, Spring 1990.