This article proposes a system for document organization based on cueing and page formatting techniques. The logical and systematic use of cueing and formatting creates a visual hierarchy organizing and signalling information for the reader. When the proposed system is properly applied, the result is increased reading speeds, increased ease of access and increased comprehension.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KolersP., The Processing of Visible Language, KolersP.WrolstadM., and BoumaH. (eds.), Plenum, New York, 1979.
2.
NorthA. and JenkinsL. B.Reading Speed and Comprehension as a Function of Typography, Journal of Applied Psychology, 35, pp. 225–228, 1951.
3.
KlareG.MabryJ., and GustafsonL.The Relationship of Patterning (Underlining) to Immediate Retention and to Acceptability of Technical Material, The Journal of Applied Psychology, 39, pp. 40–42, 1955.
4.
CrouseJ. and IdsteinP.Effects of Encoding Cues On Prose Learning, Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, pp. 309–313, 1972.
5.
FowlerR. and BarkerA.Effectiveness of Highlighting for Retention of Text Material, Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, pp. 358–364, 1974.
6.
ColesP. and FosterJ.Typographic Cueing as an Aid to Learning from Typewritten Text, Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 12, pp. 102–108, 1975.
7.
FosterJ. and ColesP.An Experimental Study of Typographic Cueing in Printed Text, Ergonomics, 20: 1, pp. 57–66, 1977.
8.
GlynnS.Capturing Reader's Attention by Means of Typographical Cuing Strategies, Educational Technology, 18: 11, pp. 71–12, 1978.
9.
FosterJ., The Use of Visual Cues in Text, The Processing of Visible Language, KolersP.WrolstadM., and BoumaH. (eds.), Plenum, New York, 1979.
10.
FraseL. and SchwartzB.Typographical Cues that Facilitate Comprehension, Journal of Educational Psychology, 71: 2, pp. 197–206, 1979.
11.
CrouwelW., Typography: A Technique of Making a Text Legible, The Processing of Visible Language, KolersP.WrolstadM., and BoumaH. (eds.), Plenum, New York, 1979.
12.
HartleyJ.TruemanM., and BurnhillP.The Role of Spatial Cues in the Layout of Journal References, Applied Ergonomics, 10: 3, pp. 165–169, 1979.
13.
WallerR., Typographic Access Structures for Educational Texts, Processing of Visible Language, KolerP.WrolstadM., and BourmaH. (eds.), Plenum, New York, pp. 175–186, 1979.
14.
WallerR., Graphic Aspects of Complex Tests: Typography as Macropunctuation, Processing of Visible Language, KolerP.WrolstadM., and BourmaH. (eds.), Plenum, New York, pp. 241–253, 1980.
15.
HartleyJ.Spatial Cues in Text, Visible Language, 14, pp. 62–79, 1980.
16.
WallerR., Using Typography to Structure Argument: A Critical Analysis of Some Examples, The Technology of Text, 2, JonassenD. (ed.), Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 105–125, 1985.
17.
GlynnS.BrittonB. and TillmanM., Typographical Cues in Text: Management of the Reader's Attention, The Technology of Text, 2, JonassenD. (ed.), Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 192–209, 1985.
18.
HawkP.McLeodN. and JonassenD., Graphic Organizers in Texts, Courseware, and Supplemental Materials, The Technology of Text, 2, JonassenD. (ed.), Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 158–185, 1985.
19.
BurnhillP. and HartleyJ., Psychology and Textbook Design: A Research Critique, Aspects of Educational Technology, BaggaleyJ.JamiesonH., and MarchantH. (eds.), Pitman, New York, pp. 65–79, 1975.
20.
MacDonald-RossM. and WallerR.Criticism, Alternative and Tests: A Conceptual Framework for Improving Typography, Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, 12: 2, pp. 75–83, 1975.
21.
WrightP.Feeding the Information Eaters: Suggestions for Integrating Pure and Applied Research on Language Comprehension, Instructional Science, 7, pp. 249–312, 1978.
22.
AmbardarA.Reading Efficiency: Analysis of Techniques for Adult Readers, Reading Improvement, 21: 1, pp. 21–27, 1984.
23.
JustM. and CarpenterP., The Psychology of Reading and Language Comprehension, Allyn and Bacon, Inc., Boston, 1987.
24.
CalfeeR., Cognitive Psychology and Educational Practice, Review of Research in Education, FE Peacock Publishers, Itasca, Illinois, 1981.
25.
GagneR., The Conditions of Learning (3rd Edition), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1977.
26.
PughA. K., Silent Reading, Heinemann, London, 1978.
27.
DiehlW. and MikuleckyL., Making Written Information Fit Workers Purposes, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, PC 24: 1, pp. 5–9, 1981.
28.
HuckinT., A Cognitive Approach to Readability, New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory and Practice, AndersonP.BrockmanJ., and MillerC. (eds.), Baywood Publishing Company, Amityville, New York, pp. 90–108, 1983.
29.
SamuelsM., Technical Reading Processes and Collaborative Learning: New Approaches to Structuring Readable Texts, Technical Communication, First Quarter, pp. 10–15, 1988.
30.
PoultonE. C.Searching for Newspaper Headlines Printed in Capitals or Lower-case Letters, Journal of Applied Psychology, 51: 5, pp. 417–425, 1967.
31.
SpencerH.ReynoldsL., and CoeB., A Comparison of the Effectiveness of Selected Typographic Variations, Readability of Print Research Unit, Royal College of Art, London, 1973.
32.
AusubelD.NovakJ., and HanesianH., Educational Psychology: A Cognitive View, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1978.
33.
AndersonR., Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension, The Psychology of Written Communication: Selected Readings, HartleyJ. (ed.), Kogan Page, New York, 1980.
34.
BertinJ., Semiology of Graphics, BergW. (trans.), The University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, 1983.
35.
KosslynS.PinkerS.SimcoxW., and ParkinL., Understanding Charts and Graphs: A Project in Applied Cognitive Science, Washington, D.C., 1983.
36.
DondisD., A Primer of Visual Literacy, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1973.
37.
MarcusA., Tutorial on use of Color to Improve Instruction, Computer Graphics Today, May, pp. 11–12, 48–49, 1986.
38.
MillerG.The Magical Number Seven, Plus or Minus Two: Some Limits on Our Capacity for Processing Information, Psychological Review, 3: 2, pp. 81–97, 1956.
39.
GibsonE. and LevinH., The Psychology of Reading, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1975.
40.
BurtC., A Psychological Study of Typography, The University Press, Cambridge, England, 1959.
41.
TinkerM., Legibility of Print, Iowa State University Press, Ames, 1963.
42.
HartleyJ. and BurnhillB., Understanding Text: Typography, Layout and Design, in Adult Learning: Psychological Research and Applications, HoweM. (ed.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1977.
43.
AndersonT. and ArmbrusterB., Studying Strategies and Their Implications for Textbook Design, in Designing Usable Texts, DuffyT. and WallerR. (eds.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 159–177, 1985.
44.
HershbergerW. A. and TerryD. F., Typographical Cueing in Conventional and Programmed Texts, Journal of Applied Psychology, 40, pp. 55–60, 1965.
45.
DuchastelP. C., Textual Display Techniques, The Technology of Text, Vol. 1, JonassenD. (ed.), Educational Technology Publications, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 167–19, 1982.
46.
ReheR., Typography: How to Make It Most Legible, Design Research International, Carmel, Indiana, 1974.
47.
SaenzN. and RicheC.Shape and Color Dimensions of a Visual Redundant Code, Human Factors, 16: 3, pp. 308–313, 1974.
48.
KanarickA. and PetersonR.Redundant Color Coding and Keeping Track Performance, Human Factors, 13: 2, pp. 183–188, 1971.
49.
GribbonsW. M., Visual Literacy in Corporate Communication: Some Implications for Information Design, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication34: 1, 42–50, 1991.
50.
GribbonsW. M.Electronic Publishing: Issues for the Technical Publication Manager, Technical Communication, 4: 1, pp. 300–304, 1988.
