The present study examines substance use among academically successful students. The data were collected in two discrete anonymous surveys of 2,288 ninth-grade and 2,653 eleventh-grade California students, and 1,043 ninth-grade and 862 eleventh-grade students from a large suburban county. Over 70 percent of the academically successful students from both samples reported some type of drug use. These successful students were divided for comparison into three groups according to their involvement with drugs: abstainers, conventional users, and high-risk users. The analyses indicated that the negative association between drug use and academic achievement may be counterbalanced by mediating factors identified in the study. These factors included high “educational aspiration,” “parent educational level,” and “emotional stability.”
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M., and BachmanJ. G., Drug Use, Drinking, and Smoking: National Survey Results from High School, College, and Young Adult Population: 1975–1988, National Institute on Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1989.
2.
SkagerR.FrithS. L., and MaddahianE., Biennial Survey of Drug and Alcohol Use among California Students in Grades 7, 9, and 11 (report to Attorney General John K. VanDeKamp), Office of Attorney General, Crime Prevention Center, Sacramento, California, 1989.
3.
NewcombM. D.MaddahianE.SkagerR., and BentlerP. M., Substance Abuse and Psychosocial Risk Factors among Teenagers: Associations with Sex, Age, Ethnicity, and Type of School, Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse, 13: 4, pp. 413–433, 1987.
4.
FriedmanA. S.GlickmanN., and UtadaA. T., Predicting from Earlier Substance Abuse and Earlier Grade Point Average to Failure to Graduate from High School, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 31: 1, pp. 25–31, 1985.
5.
JessorR.ChaseJ. A., and DonovanJ. E., Psychosocial Correlatees of Marijuana Use and Problem Drinking in a National Sample of Adolescents, American Journal of Public Health, 70: 9, pp. 604–613, 1980.
6.
BryB., Predicting Drug Abuse: Review and Reformations, The International Journal of the Addiction, 18: 2, pp. 223–233, 1983.
7.
HawkinsJ. D.LishnerD. M.CatalanoR. F., and HowardM. O., Childhood Predictors of Adolescent Substance Abuse: Toward an Empirically Grounded Theory, Journal of Children in Contemporary Society, 18: 1/2, pp. 11–48, 1985.
8.
SvobodnyL. A., Biographical, Self-concept and Educational Factors among Chemically Dependent Adolescents, Adolescence, 17: 68, pp. 847–853, 1982.
9.
HundelbyJ. D.CarpenterR. A.RossR. A. J., and MercerG. W., Adolescent Drug Use and Other Behaviors, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23, pp. 61–68, 1982.
10.
PaulsonM. J.CoombsR. H., and RichardsonM. A., School Performance, Academic Aspirations, and Drug Use among Children and Adolescents, Journal of Drug Education, 20: 4, pp. 289–303, 1990.
11.
NewcombM. D. and BentlerP. M., Consequences of Adolescent Drug Use: Impact on the Lives of Young AdultsSage Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1988.
12.
HubaG. and BentlerP. M., Beginning Adolescent Drug Use and Peer and Adult Interaction Patterns, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, pp. 265–276, 1979.
13.
KandelD. B., Drug Use by Youth: An Overview, in Drug Abuse and the American Adolescent, (NIDA research monograph), LettieriD. and LidfordJ. P. (eds.), National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockwell, Maryland, 1982.
14.
MillsC. J. and NoyesH. L., Patterns and Correlates of Initial and Subsequent Drug Use among Adolescents, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 52: 2, pp. 231–243, 1984.
15.
BattjesR. J., Prevention of Adolescent Drug Abuse, The International Journal of the Addictions, 20: 6–7, pp. 1113–1114, 1985.
16.
BrookJ. S.BrookD. W.GordonA. S.WhitemanM., and CohenP., The Psychosocial Etiology of Adolescent Drug Use: A Family Interactional Approach, Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 116: 2, pp. 111–267, 1990.
17.
SkagerR.FisherD., and MaddahianE., A Statewide Survey of Drug and Alcohol Use Among California Students in Grades 7, 9, and 11 (report to Attorney General John K. VanDeKamp), Office of Attorney General, Crime Prevention Center, Sacramento, California, 1986.
18.
SkagerR. and FrithS. L., Identifying At Risk Substance Users in Grades 9 and 11: A Report on the 1987/88 California Substance Use Survey (report to Attorney General John K. VanDeKamp), Office of Attorney General, Sacramento, California, 1989.
19.
KandelD. B., Interpersonal Influences on Adolescent Illegal Drug Use, in Drug Use: Epidemiological and Sociological Approaches, JosephsonE. and CarrolE. (eds.), Hemisphere Corp., Washington, D.C., 1974.
20.
BrofenbrennerU., Influences on Human Development, Dryden Press, Hinsdale, Illinois, 1972.
21.
ShapsE.DiBartoloR.MoskowitzJ.PalleyE., and ChurginS., A Review of Drug Prevention Program Evaluations, Journal of Drug Issues, 11, pp. 17–44, 1981.
22.
ToblerN. S., Meta-analysis of 143 Adolescent Drug Prevention Programs: Quantitative Outcome Results of Program Participants Compared to a Control or Comparison Group, Journal of Drug Issues, 16: 4, pp. 537–567, 1988.
23.
BenardB., Fostering Resiliency in Kids: Protective Factors in the Family, School, and Community, Western Center for Drug Free Schools and Community/Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, NWREL, Portland, Oregon, 1991.
24.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M., and BachmanJ. G., Drugs and American High School Students: 1975–1983, National Institute of Drug Abuse, Rockville, Maryland, 1984.
25.
ShedlerJ. and BlockJ., Adolescent Drug Use and Psychological Health, American Psychologist, 45: 5, pp. 612–630, 1990.
26.
HardtR. H. and Peterson-HardtS., On Determining the Quality of the Delinquency Self-report Method, Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 14, pp. 247–261, 1977.
27.
AmstelZ.MandellW.MatthiasL.MasonC., and HochermanI., Reliability and Validity of Self-reported Illegal Activities and Drug Use Collected From Narcotic Addicts, International Journal of the Addictions, 11, pp. 325–336, 1976.
