Government control of handguns for the purpose of reducing the incidence of accidental and/or intentional death and injury has not proven effective. Much of the research concerning accidental death and injury from firearms approaches the problem epidemiologically and identifies the gun as the agent. This study examined “control” of the handgun user through required training which stressed safety and legal use of the handgun. This study examined data involving 294 handgun owners for a five-year time period to determine the effectiveness of handgun training on accident reduction. The results were significant and supported the need for owner training in handgun use to reduce the incidence of accidents.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ShieldsN. T., Gun Control: Two Points of View, ACJS Today, February 7, 1982.
2.
ReimanJ. H., The Rich Get Richer and The Poor Get Prison: Ideology, Class, and Criminal Justice, John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1979.
3.
WalkerS., Sense and Nonsense about Crime: A Policy Guide, Brooks/Cole, Monterey, California, 1985.
4.
CarterN. B., Gun Control: Two Points of View, ACJS Today, February 7, 1982.
5.
BorduaD. J., Gun Control and Opinion Measurement: Adversary Polling and One Construction of Social Meaning, in Firearms and Violence: Issues of Public Policy, KatesD. B. (ed.), Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
6.
RushforthN. B., Accidental Firearms Fatalities in a Metropolitan County (1958–1973), American Journal of Epidemiology, 100, pp. 499–505, 1974.
7.
MeredithN., The Murder Epidemic, Science, December 1984.
8.
U.S. Department of Justice, Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, 1987, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, D.C., 1988.
9.
National Safety Council, Accident Facts 1985, National Safety Council, Chicago, 1986.
10.
WrightJ. D.RossiP. H., and DalyK., Under the Gun: Weapons, Crime, and Violence in America, Aldine, New York, 1983.
11.
WrightJ. D., The Ownership of Firearms for Reasons of Self Defense, in Firearms and Violence: Issues of Public Policy, KatesD. B. (ed.), Ballinger, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984.
12.
McDowellD. and LoftinC., Collective Security and Fatal Firearms Accidents, Criminology, 23, pp. 401–416, 1985.
13.
GreenG. S., Citizen Gun Ownership and Criminal Deterrence, Criminology, 25, p. 63, 1987.
14.
LesterD. and MurrellM. E., The Influence of Gun Control Laws on Suicidal Behavior, American Journal of Psychiatry, 137, pp. 121–122, 1980.
15.
ArnoldD., Handguns for Home Defense, Guns and Ammo Special Book, Peterson Publishing, Los Angeles, 1982.
16.
NewtonG. and ZimringF., Firearms and Violence in American Life, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1969.
17.
CookP. J., The Role of Firearms in Violent Crime: An Interpretive Review of the Literature, in Criminal Violence, WolfgangM. and WeinerN. (eds.), Sage, Beverly Hills, 1981.
18.
LizotteA. J.BorduaD. J., and WhiteC. S., Firearms Ownership for Sport and Protection: Two Not So Divergent Models, American Sociological Review, 46, pp. 622–629, 1981.
19.
National Center for Health Statistics, Vital and Health Statistics of the U.S. Washington, D.C., 1988.
20.
State of Tennessee, Vital and Medical Statistics, 1988; Nashville Office of Health and Environment, 1989.
21.
BinderA. and GeisG., Methods of Research in Criminology and Criminal Justice, McGraw Hill, New York, 1983.
22.
HillG. D.HowellF. M., and DriverE. T., Gender, Fear, and Protective Handgun Ownership, Criminology, 23, pp. 541–552, 1985.
