In using a community model of communication based on consensus, we adopt a double-edged notion that encompasses both harmony and coercion within the community. But the possibility that any one of us might engage in coercion and/or terror when we intend to create harmony is something we would rather not acknowledge. So we use the metaphor “community” only in its benign aspect, in its possibility of harmony, to describe communication. This article explores how ideas of harmony and coercion play out in the metaphor of community and suggests four dimensions as continua along which communities could be described: choice/chance, time/space, abstract/concrete, affinity/proximity. If we break up the clearly bounded, either/or approach to modeling community, we can better accommodate the ambiguity we intuitively understand as an important part of communication.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LeavisF. R. and ThompsonD., Culture and the Environment: The Training of Critical Awareness, Chatto & Windus, London, 1933.
2.
WilliamsR., Culture and Society, 1780–1950, Columbia University Press, New York, 1958/1983.
3.
LeavisF. R. and LeavisQ. D., Lectures in America, Pantheon Books, New York, 1969.
4.
de CerteauM., The Practice of Everyday Life, University of California Press, Berkeley, 1984.
5.
LongoB., Tensions and Paradoxes Inherent in the Idea of Community, paper presented at the Convention of College Composition and Communication, Washington, D.C., March 23–26, 1995.
6.
BenjaminW., Illuminations, Shocken Books, New York, 1968.
7.
WilliamsR., Keywords: A Vocabulary of Culture and Society (Rev. Edition), Oxford University Press, New York, 1983.
8.
LyotardJ.-F., The Postmodern Explained, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1992.
9.
FoucaultM., Archaeology of Knowledge, Barnes & Noble, New York, 1972.
10.
FoucaultM., Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–77, GordonC. (ed.), Pantheon, New York, 1980.
11.
LyotardJ.-F., The Differend: Phrases in Dispute, Van Den AbbeeleG. (trans.), University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1988.
12.
FoucaultM., The Subject and Power, in Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics (2nd Edition), DreyfusH. L. and RabinowP. (eds.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1983.
13.
de CerteauM., Heterologies: Discourse on the Other, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1986.
14.
PorterR., Introduction, in Science, Culture and Popular Belief in Renaissance Europe, Manchester University Press, Manchester, 1991.
15.
AronowitzS., Science as Power: Discourse and Ideology in Modern Society, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1988.
16.
GramsciA., Selections from the Prison Notebooks, HoareQ. and SmithG. N. (eds.), International Publishers, New York, 1971.
17.
MillerC., A Humanistic Rationale for Technical Writing, College English, 40:6, pp. 610–617, Fall 1979.
18.
BizzellP., Cognition, Convention, and Certainty: What We Need to Know About Writing, Pre/Text, 3:3, pp. 213–243, 1982.
19.
NystrandM., Rhetoric's “Audience” and Linguistic's “Speech Community”: Implications for Understanding Writing, Reading, and Text, in What Writers Know: The Language, Process, and Structure of Written Discourse, NystrandM. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, pp. 1–17, 1982.
20.
FreedR. C. and BroadheadG. J., Discourse Communities, Sacred Texts, and Institutional Norms, College Composition and Communication, 38, pp. 154–165, 1987.
21.
CooperM. and HoltzmanM., Writing as Social Action, Heinemann, Portsmouth, 1989.
22.
TrimburJ., Consensus and Difference in Collaborative Learning, College English, 51, pp. 602–616, 1989.
23.
BurnettR. E., Conflict in Collaborative Decision-Making, in Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, BlylerN. R. and ThrallsC. (eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp. 144–162, 1993.
24.
DautermannJ., Negotiating Meaning in a Hospital Discourse Community, in Writing in the Workplace: New Research Perspectives, SpilkaRachel (ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, pp. 98–110, 1993.
25.
ClarkG., Rescuing the Discourse of Community, College Composition and Communication, 45:1, pp. 61–74, 1994.
26.
MillerC., Rhetoric and Community: The Problem of the One and the Many, in Defining the New Rhetorics, EnosT. and BrownS. C. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, pp. 79–94, 1993.
27.
KentT., Formalism, Social Construction, and the Problem of Interpretive Authority, in Professional Communication: The Social Perspective, BlylerN. R. and ThrallsC. (eds.), Sage Publications, Newbury Park, pp. 79–91, 1993.
28.
KentT., On the Very Idea of a Discourse Community, College Composition and Communication, 42:4, pp. 425–445, 1991.
29.
Jimmie KillingsworthM., Discourse Communities—Local and Global, Rhetoric Review, 11:1, pp. 110–122, Fall 1992.
30.
LyotardJ.-F., The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, 1984.
31.
HalloranM., Rhetoric in the American College Curriculum: The Decline of Public Discourse, Pre/Text, 3:3, pp. 245–269, 1982.
32.
BizzellP., Beyond Anti-Foundationalism to Rhetorical Authority: Problems Defining “Cultural Literacy,”College English, 52:6, pp. 661–675, October 1990.
33.
ClarkG., Rescuing the Discourse of Community, College Composition and Communication, 45:1, pp. 61–74, 1994.
34.
BrittBethLongoBernadette, and WooleverKristin R., Extending the Boundaries of Rhetoric in Legal Pedagogy, Journal of Business and Technical Writing, manuscript accepted for publication April 1996.
35.
LongoBernadette, Corporate Culture and its Effect on Audience Awareness, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 38:4, 1995.
36.
LongoBernadette, Tensions in the Community: Modernity and Postmodernity, Myths and Grand Narratives, Totality and Terror, Modernity/Postmodernity: Essays on Community, Critique, and Subjectivity, LewandowskiJoseph and HowardJohn S. (eds.), in press.
37.
LongoBernadette, Guest Editorial: Assessing Audience from a Cultural Perspective: Targeting the Medical Marketplace, Journal of Hospital Marketing, 9:2, 1995.
38.
LongoBernadette, Tensions and Paradoxes Inherent in the Idea of Community, U.S. Department of Education, Educational Resources Information Center (ERIC), 1995.
39.
LongoBernadette, The Role of Metadiscourse in Persuasion, Technical Communication41:2, 1994.
