The proportions of Computer Science (CS) graduates who are women has been declining in the last fifteen years. At a time when the demand for computer programmers and systems analysts has been increasing, why are women becoming a smaller proportion of those enrolling in CS programs? This article presents a categorization by educational stages of the research into this topic, and an evaluation of the generalizability of findings to broader contexts. The categorization shows that the most extensive research on women in computing is done at the post-secondary stage, and uses students as non-randomly selected subjects. These studies are non-comprehensive, but where similar results are found in a number of studies, the findings are supported. The emphasis in research focuses on structural factors at the elementary stage, but by the post-secondary stage the emphasis is more likely to be on social psychological factors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Statistics Canada, Universities: Enrolment and Degrees, (Report No. 81–204). Education, Culture and Tourism Division, 1994.
2.
Office of Technology Policy (DOC), America's New Deficit: The Shortage of Information Technology Workers, (Report No. 143). Washington, DC: 1997. http://www.ta.doc.gov.
3.
GowerD., The Booming Market for Programmers, Perspectives, Summer, Statistics Canada (Cat. No. 75–001-XPE), 1998.
4.
Enrolment target for high-tech programs will be met, McMaster Courier, p. 8, August 1998.
5.
Statistics Canada, Computer Service Industry, Summary Statistics for Firms Primarily Engaged in Providing Computer Services by Province, and Income Size Group, Annual, (Report No. 63–222), CANSIM, 1998.
6.
SeymourE. and HewittN. M., Talking about Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, 1997.
7.
FrenkelK. A., Women and Computing, Communications of the ACM, 33: 11, pp. 34–46, 1990.
8.
KleinS. S., (ed.), Handbook for Achieving Sex Equity through Education, The Johns Hopkins University Press, New York, 1985.
9.
BaumE., Recruiting and Graduating Women: The Underrepresented Student, IEEE Communications Magazine, pp. 47–50, 1980.
10.
KieslerS.SproullL., and EcclesJ. S., Pool Halls, Chips, and War Games: Women in the Culture of Computing, Psychology of Women Quarterly, 9, pp. 451–462, 1985.
11.
BreeneL. A., Women and Computer Science, Initiatives, 55: 2, pp. 39–44, 1992.
12.
TurkleS., Computational Reticence: Why Women Fear the Intimate Machine, in Technology and Women's Voices: Keeping in Touch, KramaraeC. (ed.), New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul, pp. 41–61, 1988.
13.
ACM Committee of the Status of Women in Computing Science, Becoming a Computer Scientist, Communications of the ACM, 33: 5, pp. 47–57, 1990.
14.
ClarkV. A., Sex Differences in Computing Participation: Concerns, Extent, Reasons, and Strategies, Australian Journal of Education, 34: 1, pp. 52–66, 1990.
15.
WareN. C.StecklerN. A., and LesermanJ., Undergraduate Women: Who Chooses a Science Major?Journal of Higher Education, 56: 1, pp. 73–84, 1985.
16.
ReinenI. J. and PlompJ., Some Gender Issues in Educational Computer Use: Results of an International Comparative Survey, Computers and Education, 20: 4, pp. 353–365, 1993.
17.
ByrneE. M., Women and Science: The Snark Syndrome, The Falmer Press, London, 1993.
18.
LeeM., Gender, Group Composition, and Peer Interaction in Computer-Based Cooperative Learning, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 9: 4, pp. 549–577, 1993.
19.
BarbieriM. S. and LightP. H., Interaction, Gender, and Performance on a Computer-Based Problem Solving Task, Learning and Instruction, 2, pp. 199–213, 1992.
HuffC., Unintentional Power in the Design of Computer Systems, Computers and Society, pp. 6–9, December 1996.
22.
ChappellK. K., Mathematics Computer Software Characteristics with Possible Gender-Specific Impact: A Content Analysis, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15: 1, pp. 25–35, 1996.
23.
RingG., Student Reactions to Courseware: Gender Differences, British Journal of Educational Technology, 22: 3, pp, 210–215, 1991.
24.
Platt, Baroness of Writtle, Attracting Women Returners in Computing, in Women into Computing: Selected Papers, 1988–1990, LovegroveG. and SegalB. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 22–28, 1991.
25.
ShashaaniL., Gender-Differences in Computer Experience and Its Influence on Computer Attitudes, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11: 4, pp. 347–367, 1994.
26.
JonesT. and ClarkeV. A., Diversity as a Determinant of Attitudes: A Possible Explanation of the Apparent Advantage of Single-Sex Settings, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 1, pp. 51–64, 1995.
27.
LevinT., and GordonC., Effect of Gender and Computer Experience on Attitudes Toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 5: 1, pp. 69–88, 1989.
28.
DurndellA.GlissovP., and SiannG., Gender and Computing: Persisting Differences, Educational Research, 3, pp. 219–227, 1995.
29.
CooperJ., and StoneJ., Gender, Computer-Assisted Learning, and Anxiety: With a Little Help from a Friend, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15: 1, pp. 67–91, 1996.
30.
LynamL. and KamalM., High School Students' Perception of University BCIS Program—What is Wrong and What Can We Do?Interface, 14: 1, pp. 61–65, 1992.
31.
CraigA.FisherJ.ScollaryA., and SinghM., Closing the Gap: Women Education and Information Technology Courses in Australia, Journal of Systems and Software, 40: 1, pp. 7–15, 1998.
32.
CampT., Incredible Shrinking Pipeline, Communications of the ACM, 40: 10, pp. 103–110, 1997.
33.
FisherA.MargolisJ., and MillerF., Undergraduate Women in Computer Science: Experience, Motivation and Culture, SIGCSE Bulletin, pp. 106–110, 1997.
34.
DurndellA. and LightbodyP., Gender and Computing: Change Over Time?Computers in Education, 21: 4, pp. 331–336, 1993.
35.
DurndellA., Choice and Image: Gender and Computer Studies in Higher Education, in Women into Computing: Selected Papers, 1998–1990, LovegroveG. and SegalB. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 152–160, 1991.
36.
ColleyA.HillF.HillJ., and JonesA., Gender Effects in the Stereotyping of Those with Different Kinds of Computing Experience, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 1, pp. 19–27, 1995.
37.
TeagueJ. and ClarkeV., Fiction and Fact: Students' and Professionals' Perceptions of Women in Computer Science, Proceedings of the Conference on Women, Work and Computerization, pp. 377–390, 1991.
38.
GeenensR. B. and RaoL. M., Student Perceptions of Careers in Computer-Related Occupations, Interface, 14: 3, pp. 25–28, 1992.
39.
TeagueJ., Raising the Self Confidence and Self Esteem of Final Year Female Students Prior to Job Interviews, SIGCSE Bulletin, 24: 1, pp. 67–71, 1992.
40.
BuschT., Gender Differences in Self-Efficacy and Attitudes Toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12: 2, pp. 147–158. 1995.
41.
BuschT., Gender, Group Composition, Cooperation, and Self-Efficacy in Computer Studies, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15: 2, pp. 125–135, 1996.
42.
Pope-DavisD. B. and TwingJ. S., The Effects of Age, Gender, and Experience on Measures of Attitude Regarding Computers, Computers in Human Behavior, 7, pp. 333–339, 1991.
43.
Pope-DavisD. B. and VispoelW. P., How Instruction Influences Attitudes of College Men and Women towards Computers, Computers in Human Behavior, 9, pp. 83–93, 1993.
44.
MassoudS. L., Computer Attitudes and Computer Knowledge of Adult Students, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 7, pp. 269–291, 1991.
45.
MorganK.GibbsS.MaCleodH., and MorrisR., Computer Attitudes, Interface Preference and Simple Task Performance, in Women into Computing: Selected Papers, 1998–1990, LovegroveG. and SegalB. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, London, pp. 161–172, 1991.
46.
TaylorH. G. and MounfieldL. C., Exploration of the Relationship between Prior Computing Experience and Gender on Success in College Computer Science, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11: 4, pp. 291–306, 1994.
47.
BrownJ.AndreaeP.BiddleR., and TemperoE., Women in Introductory Computer Science: Experience at Victoria University of Wellington, SIGCSE Bulletin, pp. 111–115, 1997.
48.
CorstonR. and ColmanA. M., Gender and Social Facilitation Effects on Computer Competence and Attitudes toward Computers, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14: 2, pp. 171–183, 1996.
49.
StepulevageL.HenwoodF., and PlumeridgeS., Women-Only Computing in Higher Education, IFIP Transactions A: Computer Science and Technology, A57, pp. 277–294, 1991.
50.
RasmussenB. and HapnesT., Excluding Women from the Technologies of the Future? A Case Study of the Culture of Computer Science, Futures, 23: 10, pp. 1108–1119, 1991.
51.
HenwoodF., WISE Choices? Understanding Occupational Decision-Making in a Climate of Equal Opportunities for Women in Science and Technology. Gender and Education, 8: 2, pp. 199–214, 1996.
52.
BernsteinD. R., Computing, Diversity and Community: Fostering the Computing Culture, SIGCSE Bulletin, pp. 101–105, 1997.
53.
LipsH. M. and TempleL., Majoring in Computer Science: Causal Models for Women and Men, Research in Higher Education, 31: 1, pp. 99–113, 1990.
