Universities and colleges are investing millions of dollars in information technology infrastructure to support teaching, research, and service, and thousands of dollars annually in faculty training programs. And yet, many college graduates entering the workforce lack adequate technology skills. To ascertain the frequency of faculty adoption of information technology, we surveyed a random sample of faculty in the liberal arts and sciences departments in our university. Overall faculty members (n = 174) reported a low usage of information technology for teaching, though the rate of software adoption is higher than the rate of hardware adoption. While opportunities to learn technology are available, about two-thirds of the faculty members have not completed the available seminars and workshops on information technologies but prefer more informal ways of learning information technology, such as talking with other faculty members.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
OlsenF., Colleges Expect to Increase Information-Technology Spending by 5 Percent, Chronicle of Higher Education, Wednesday, March 26, 2003. Downloaded from http://chronicle.com, June 30, 2004.
The American College Teacher: National Norms-1998-1999 Higher Education Research Institute Faculty Survey Report, UCLA, Los Angeles, 1999.
4.
LammersW. J. and MurphyJ. J., A Profile of Teaching Techniques Used in the University Classroom, Active Learning in Higher Education, 3: 1, pp. 54–67, 2003.
5.
GreenK. C., Tracking the Digital Puck in 2004, Syllabus, 17: 5, pp. 10–13, 2003a.
TaftD. K., Service as Science, eWeek, 21, p. 21, 2004.
8.
DillmanD. A., Mail and Internet Surveys, John Wiley, New York, 2000.
9.
BabbieE., The Practice of Social Research, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1998.
10.
BourqueL. B. and FielderF. P., How to Construct Self-Administered and Mail Surveys, in The Survey Kit, FinkA. (ed.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 1995.
11.
FinkA., The Survey Kit, Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, 1995.
12.
Frankfort-NachmiasC. and NachmiasD., Research Methods in the Social Sciences, St. Martin's Press, New York, 1996.
13.
SalantP. and DillmanD. A., How to Conduct Your Own Survey, John Wiley, New York, 1994.
14.
ZimmermanD. E. and MuraskiM., The Elements of Information Gathering, Oryx, Phoenix, Arizona, 1995.
15.
WarburtonE. C.ChenX., and BradburnE. M., Teaching with Technology: Use of Telecommunications Technology by Postsecondary Instructional Faculty and Staff in Fall 1998, U.S. Department of Education, Washington, D.C., 2002.
16.
SeminoffN. E. and WepnerS. B., Are Technology-Based Projects Valued as Scholarship for Tenure and Promotion?Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 11: 3, pp. 5–10, 1995.
17.
MeltzerJ. and ShermanT. M., Ten Commandments for Successful Technology Implementation and Staff Development, Bulletin, pp. 23–32, 1997.
18.
SolomonG. and SolomonS., Technology and Professional Development-10 Tips to Make it Better, Learning and Leading with Technology, 23: 3, pp. 38–39, 1995.
19.
CradlerJ.FreemanM.CradlerR., and McNabbM., Research Implications for Preparing Teachers to Use Technology, Learning and Leading with Technology, 30: 1, pp. 50–54, 2002.
20.
NorrisD. M. and KeehnA. K., IT Planning: Cultivating Innovation and Value, Syllabus, 17: 4, pp. 11–16, 2003.
21.
GuskeyT. R., Staff Development and the Process of Teacher Change, Educational Researcher, 5, pp. 5–12, 1986.
22.
SnyderT. D. and HoffmanC. M., Digest of Education Statistics, 2002. (Report No. NCES 2003060). National Center on Education Statistics, Washington, D.C. [Online]. Available at: http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2003/2003060g.pdf, 2003.
RogersE., Diffusion of Innovations (5th Edition), The Free Press, New York, 2003.
25.
AjzenI. and FishbeinM., Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1980.
26.
BanduraA., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control, Free Press, New York, 1997.
27.
BergerC. and ChaffeeS. (eds.), Handbook of Communication Science, Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1987.
28.
SeminoffN. E. and WepnerS. B., What Should We Know About Technology-Based Projects for Tenure and Promotion, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 30: 1, pp. 67–82, 1997.
29.
YohonT. and ZimmermanD. E., An Exploratory Study of Adoption of Course Management Software and Accompanying Instructional Changes by Faculty in the Liberal Arts and Sciences, Electronic Journal of Learning, 2: 2, pp. 313–320, 2004.
30.
YohonT. and ZimmermanD. E., Strategies for Online Critiquing of Student Assignments, Theses, and Dissertations, Journal of Business & Technical Communication, 18: 2, pp. 220–232, 2004.
31.
ZimmermanD. E., and YohonT., Rethinking Information Technology Transfer in Higher Education, Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference 2004, Minneapolis, Minnesota, IEEE Professional Communication Society, 4 pp. CD-ROM, forthcoming, September 2004.
32.
ZimmermanD. E.YohonT., and WarcupS., Improving Web Site Navigation: Creating High-Scent Links, Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference 2004, Minneapolis, Minnesota, IEEE Professional Communication Society, 4 pp. CD-ROM, September 2004.
33.
ZimmermanD. E. and YohonT., An Assessment of Using Online Editing of Students Assignments in an Advanced Technical Writing Class, Proceedings of the International Professional Communication Conference 2002, pp. 259–270, IEEE Professional Communication Society.
