This article reviewed empirical studies published in the past 30 years that examined software piracy among college students. It focused on three areas of study: (a) major factors that affect college students' intentions, attitudes, and moral intensity regarding software piracy, (b) various decision-making processes that underlie software piracy behavior, and (c) technical, legal, and educational strategies that deal with college students' software piracy. Limitations of existing research and future research directions were discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AjzenI. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50, 179–211.
2.
AngA. Y., & LoB. W. N. (1998). Software piracy attitudes of tertiary students in Australia. In Electronic proceedings of the South East Asian Computer Conference, Darwin, Australia.
3.
BallantineP. (2000). Examining the effects of culture on perceptions of moral intensity: A comparison of future marketers from Malaysia and New Zealand. Proceedings of AMZMAC 2000 Visionary Marketing for 21st Century: Facing the Challenge, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.
4.
ChengH. K. (1995). Hacking, computer viruses, and software piracy: The implications of modern computer fraud for corporations. In Corporate misconduct: The legal, societal and management issues, SpencerM. P. & SimsR. (Eds.), Quorum Books, Westport, pp. 125–147.
5.
ChengH. K.SimsR. R., & TeegenH. (1997). To purchase or to pirate software: An empirical study. Journal of MIS, 13(4), 49–60.
6.
ChristensenA. L., & EiningM. M. (1991). Factors influencing software piracy: Implications for accountants. Journal of Information Systems, 5(1), 67–80.
7.
CohenE., & CornwallL. (1989). College students believe piracy is acceptable. CIS Educator Forum, 1(3), 2–5.
8.
CronbachL. J., & GleserG. C. (1965). Psychological tests and personnel decisions (2nd ed.). Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
9.
EiningM. M., & ChristensenA. L. (1991). A psycho-social model of software piracy: The development and test of a model. In DejoieR.FowlerG., and ParadiceD. (Eds.), Ethical Issues in Information Systems (pp. 182–188). Boston, MA: Boyd & Fraser.
10.
EhrlichI. (1973). Participation in illegitimate activities: A theoretical and empirical investigation. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 521–565.
11.
EllisD. R. (1986). Computer law—a primer on the law of software protection. The Florida Bar Journal, 60(4), 81–84.
12.
FishbeinM., & AjzenI. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
13.
GlassR. S., & WoodW. A. (1996). Situational determinants of software piracy: An equity theory perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 1189–1198.
14.
GopalR. D., & SandersG. L. (1997). Preventive and deterrent controls for software piracy. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13(4), 29–47.
15.
GuptaO. B.GouldS. J., & PolaB. (2004). “To pirate or not to pirate”: A comparative study of the ethical versus other influences on the consumer's software acquisition-mode decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 255–274.
16.
HollingerR. C. (1993). Crime by computer: Correlates of software piracy and unauthorized account access. Security Journal, 4(1), 2–12.
17.
HuntS. D., & VitellS. J. (1986). A general theory of marketing ethics. Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5–16.
18.
HustedB. W. (2000). The impact of national culture on software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 197–211.
19.
ImA. J., & AhA. G. (1997). Software copyright infringements: An exploratory study of the effects of individual and peer beliefs. Omega, 25(3), 335–344.
20.
ImJ. H., & KoenC. (1990). Software piracy and responsibilities of educational institutions. Information & Management, 18, 189–194.
21.
JrK. M. C., & ImH. J. (1997). Software piracy and its legal implications. Information & Management, 31, 265–272.
22.
KiniR. B.RomingerA., & VijayaramanB. S. (2000). An empirical study of software piracy and moral intensity among university students. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 40(3), 62–72.
23.
KiniR. B.RamakrishnaH. V., & VijayaramanB. S. (2003). An exploratory study of moral intensity regarding software piracy of students in Thailand. Behavior & Information Technology, 22(1), 63–70.
24.
KiniR. B.RamakrishnaH. V., & VijayaramanB. S. (2004). Shaping of moral intensity regarding software piracy: A comparison between Thailand and U.S. students. Journal of Business Ethics, 49, 91–104.
25.
KowalskiS., & KowalskiH. (1990). Computer ethics and computer abuse: A study of Swedish and Canadian university data processing students. Information Age, 12(4), 206–212.
26.
LimayemM.KhalifaM., & ChinW. W. (1999). Factors motivating software piracy: A longitudinal study. Proceedings of the 20th international conference on information systems, pp. 124–131, Charlotte, NC.
27.
LinT. C.HsuM. H.KuoF. Y., & SunP. C. (1999). An intention model-based study of software piracy. Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii international conference on system sciences.
28.
LinekE. (2004). A brief history of trade secret law, part 1. BioProcess International, October, 1–4.
29.
LogsdonM. J.ThompsonK. J., & ReidA. R. (1994). Software piracy: Is it related to level of moral judgment?Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 849–857.
30.
MalhotraY. (1994a). Controlling copyright infringements of intellectual property: The case of computer software—part one. Journal of Systems Management, 45(6), 32–35.
31.
MalhotraY. (1994b). Controlling copyright infringements of intellectual property: The case of computer software—part two. Journal of Systems Management, 45(7), 12–17.
32.
MenellP. S. (1987). Tailoring legal protection for computer software. Stanford Law Review, 39, 1351–1372.
33.
MooresT. T., & DhillonG. (2000). Software piracy: A view from Hong Kong. Communications of the ACM, 43(12), 88–93.
34.
MooresT. T., & DhaliwalJ. (2004). A reversed context analysis of software piracy issues in Singapore. Information & Management, 41, 1037–1042.
35.
National Research Council (NRC). (2000). The digital dilemma. Intellectual property in the information age. Committee on Intellectual Property Rights and the Emerging Information Infrastructure of the Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
36.
OlsonJ. M., & ZannaM. P. (1993). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 44, 117–154.
37.
PeaceA. G., & GallettaD. F. (1996). Developing a predictive model of software piracy behaviour: An empirical study. Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Information Systems, December 16–18, Ohio.
38.
PeaceA. G.GallettaD. F., & ThongJ. Y. L. (2003). Software piracy in the workplace: A model and empirical test. Journal of Management Information Systems, 20(1), 153–177.
39.
RahimM. M.SeyalA. H., & RahmanM. N. (1999a). Software piracy among computing students: A Bruneian scenario. Computers & Education, 32, 301–321.
40.
RahimM. M.SeyalA. H., & RahmanM. N. (1999b). Software piracy among tertiary students in Brunei Darussalam: An empirical study. Australian Institute of Computer Ethics Conference, July, Lilydale.
41.
RahimM. M.RahmanM. N., & SeyalA. H. (2000). Softlifting intention of students in academia: A normative model. Malaysian Journal of Computer Science, 13(1), 48–55.
42.
RahimM. M.SeyalA. H., & RahmanM. N. (2001). Factors affecting softlifting intention of computing students: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 24(4), 385–405.
43.
ReidR. A.ThompsonJ. K., & LogsdonJ. M. (1992). Knowledge and attitudes of management students toward software piracy. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 33(1), 46–51.
44.
RoushW. (2002). The death of digital rights management?Technology Review, 105(2), 24–25.
45.
SchoemakerP. J. (1982). The expected utility model: Its variants, purposes, evidence and limitations. Journal of Economic Literature, 20, June, 529–563.
46.
Software Information Industry Association (SIIA). (2000). SIIA's report on global software piracy 2000. Software and Information Industry Association, Washington, D.C.
47.
SimpsonP. M.BanerjeeD., & SimpsonC. L. (1994). Softlifting: A model of motivating factors. Journal of Business Ethics, 13, 431–438.
48.
SimsR. R.ChengH. K., & TeegenH. (1996). Toward a profile of student software pirates. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 839–849.
49.
SkinnerW. F., & FreamA. M. (1997). A social learning theory analysis of computer crime among college students. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(4), 495–518.
50.
SolomonL. S., & O'BrienA. J. (1990). The effect of demographic factors on attitudes toward software piracy. In DejoieR.FowlerG., and ParadiceD. (Eds.), Ethical issues in IS. Boston, MA: Boyd and Fraser.
51.
SpinelloR. A. (2003). CyberEthics: Morality and law in cyberspace (2nd ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.
52.
TesserA., & ShafferD. R. (1990). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 479–523.
53.
ThongJ. Y. L., & YapC. S. (1998). Testing an ethical decision-making theory: The case of softlifting. Journal of Management Information Systems, 15(1), 213–237.
54.
TittleC. R. (1980). Sanctions and social deviance: The question of deterrence. New York: Praeger Publishers.
55.
TraphaganM., & GriffithA. (1998). Software piracy and global competitiveness: Report on global software piracy. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology, 12(3), 431–447.
56.
TriandisC. H. (1980). Values, attitudes and interpersonal behavior. Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1979: Beliefs, attitudes and values, pp. 159–295. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
57.
WagnerS. C. (1998). Software piracy and ethical decision making, Doctoral Dissertation, State University of New York at Buffalo.
58.
WagnerS. C., & SandersG. L. (2001). Considerations in ethical decision-making and software piracy. Journal of Business Ethics, 29(1/2), 161–167.
59.
WalsterE.BerscheidE., & WalsterW. (1973). New directions in equity research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25(2), 151–176.
60.
WijkJ. V. (2002). Dealing with piracy: Intellectual asset management in music and software. European Management Journal, 20(6), 689–698.
61.
WongE. Y. W. (1995). How should we teach computer ethics? A short study done in Hong Kong. Computers and Education, 25(4), 179–191.
62.
WongG.KongA., & NgaiS. (1990). A study of unauthorized software copying among post-secondary students in Hong Kong. The Australian Computer Journal, 22(4), 114–122.
63.
WoodW., & GlassR. (1996). Sex as a determinant of software piracy. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 36(2), 37–40.
