The United States has moved from the postwar period of prosperity capitalism to the current era of austerity capitalism. Two pillars of austerity policy are cutbacks in social services, including health care, and a further shift in the tax burden from corporations onto individuals. The corporate-controlled media attempt to justify these austerity measures by insisting that the government cutbacks and corporate tax reductions represent the will of the people, as expressed by the “tax revolt” of Proposition 13 in California and Proposition 2½ in Massachusetts. This paper argues that the tax revolt is actually a protest against the massive shift in taxes away from corporations and onto individual taxpayers. In addition, the tax revolt is not a rejection of government services, as the media and politicians have maintained. In fact, the majority of Americans want more rather than less public services and want more rather than less taxes on large corporations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KolkoJ.America and the Crisis of World Capitalism. Beacon Press, Boston, 1974.
2.
NasserA.The twilight of capitalism: Contours of the emerging epoch. The Insurgent Sociologist6(2): 5–28, 1976.
3.
DixonM.The challenge of transnational capital. In The Provisional Program of the Democratic Workers Party for the 1980s. Synthesis Publications, San Francisco, 1980.
4.
Provisional Program of the Democratic Workers Party: Background Readings. Synthesis Publications, San Francisco, 1980.
5.
Hearings on hospitals open. Nation's Health10(1), 1980.
6.
ShonickW.The public hospital and its local ecology in the United States. Int. J. Health Serv. 9(3): 359–396, 1979.
7.
Many found to lack medical insurance. New York Times, October 22, 1980.
8.
Workers Report on the Conditions of Labor and Their Effect on Patient Care at San Francisco General Hospital. Institute for the Study of Labor and Economic Crisis, San Francisco, 1979.
9.
Planned federal limit on Medicaid would shift burden to states. New York Times, April 6, 1981.
10.
DemkovichL. E.For states squeezed by Medicaid costs, the worst cmnch is still to come. National Journal, January 10, 1981, pp. 44–49.
11.
BrownP.The transfer of care: U.S. mental health policy since World War II. Int. J. Health Serv. 9(4): 645–662, 1979.
12.
Carter calls for 4.5 percent increase in Public Health Service budget for 81. Washington Report on Medicine and Health34: 3, January 24, 1980.
13.
Medicare paying only 30 percent of doctor bills. Washington Post, December 17, 1980.
14.
GeigerH. J.Agenda for the 80s: A call on medical students and residents to resist conservatism. The New Physician, May 1981, pp. 22–26.
15.
Health programs slashed, will still cost $73.4 billion. Congressional Quarterly, March 14, 1981, pp. 5–6.
16.
DixonM.In Defense of the Working Class. Synthesis Publications, San Francisco, 1979.
BodenheimerT. S.Why business taxes do not cause corporations to relocate. Our Socialism2(1): 1–5, Spring 1981.
35.
KuttnerB.Behind the ‘tax revolt’: A shift of the burden from business to homeowners. Washington Post, September 9, 1979.
36.
Oil companies gratified by vote on Proposition 11. Los Angeles Times, June 5, 1980.
37.
Issue 1 wins; Issue 2 defeated by 3-1 ratio. Toledo Blade, November 5, 1980.
38.
Taxing the Corporations by Grass Roots initiative. Institute for the Study of Labor and Economic Crisis, San Francisco, 1981.
39.
A Study in Repression: The Attack by San Francisco's Mass Media on Proposition V to Tax the Corporations. Institute for the Study of Labor and Economic Crisis, San Francisco, 1980.
40.
DixonM.BodenheimerT.Health Care in Crisis: Essays on Health Services Under Capitalism. Synthesis Publications, San Francisco, 1980.
