The paper assumes that communication is an elementary social act. It follows, therefore, that, in organizations, communication should be viewed as constituting other higher level processes. In order to test the truth of these assumptions, a general model of behavior in organizations is proposed, and communication data used as a measure of variation in the abstract variables of the model. Data analyses support the hypotheses that personal dispositions and social status influence work effort, and that work effort and satisfaction (with the organization generally, and with the department) determine worker performance. The analyses, therefore, also support the initial assumptions.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SmithP. C. and CrannyC. J., Psychology of Men at Work, Annual Review of Psychology, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, California, 1968.
2.
MurrayH. A. (and collaborators), Explorations in Personality, Oxford, New York, 1938.
3.
GranovetterM., Network Sampling: Some First Steps, American Journal of Sociology, 81, pp. 1287–1303, 1976.
4.
JainH. C., Supervisory Communication and Performance in Urban Hospitals, The Journal of Communication, 23, pp. 103–117, 1973.
5.
JamesL. R. and JonesA. P., Organizational Structure: A Review of Structural Dimensions and Their Conceptual Relationships with Individual Attitudes and Behavior, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 16, pp. 74–113, 1976.
6.
O'ReillyC. A. and RobertsK. H., Communication and Performance in Organizations, Academy of Management Proceedings, 37th Annual Meeting, pp. 375–379, 1977.
7.
AtkinsonJ. W., Motivational Determinants of Risk-Taking Behavior, Psychological Review, 64, pp. 359–372, 1957.
8.
AtkinsonJ. W., An Introduction to Motivation, Van Nostrand, Princeton, New Jersey, 1964.
9.
AtkinsonJ. W., Change of Activity: A New Focus for the Theory of Motivation, MischelT. (ed.), Human Action: Conceptual and Empirical Issues, Academic Press, New York, pp. 105–133, 1969.
10.
BlumlerJ. G. and KatzE. (eds.), The Uses of Mass Communications: Current Perspectives on Gratification Research, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills and London, 1974.
11.
BurkeR. J. and WilcoxD. S., Effects of Different Patterns and Degrees of Openness in Superior-Subordinate Communication on Subordinate Job Satisfaction, Academy of Management Journal, 12, pp. 319–326, 1969.
12.
WillitsR. D., Company Performance and Interpersonal Relations, Sloan Management Review, 8, pp. 91–107, 1967.
13.
OrganD. W. and GreeneC. N., The Perceived Purposefulness of Job Behavior: Antecedents and Consequences, Academy of Management Journal, 17, pp. 69–78, 1974.
14.
CostnerH. L., Theory, Deduction, and Rules of Correspondence, American Journal of Sociology, 75, pp. 245–263, 1969.
15.
SteersR. M. and BraunsteinD. N., A Behaviorally Based Measure of Manifest Needs in Work Settings, Journal of Vocational Behavior, 9, pp. 251–266, 1976.
16.
TorgersonW. S., Theory and Methods of Scaling, John Wiley, New York, 1958.
17.
BarnettG. A.SerotaK. B., and TaylorJ. A., Campaign Communication and Attitude Change: A Multidimensional Analysis, Human Communication Research, 2, pp. 227–244, 1976.
18.
BalesR. F., Personality and Interpersonal Behavior, Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1970.
19.
ParsonsT., The Social System, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1951.
20.
GouldnerA. Q., Patterns of Industrial Bureaucracy, The Free Press, Glencoe, Illinois, 1954.
21.
DavisK., A Method of Studying Communication Patterns in Organizations, Personnel Psychology, 6, pp. 301–312, 1953.
22.
DavisK., Success of Chain-of-Command Oral Communication in a Manufacturing Management Group, Academy of Management Journal, 11, pp. 379–387, 1968.
23.
StephensonW., The Play Theory of Mass Communication, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1967.
24.
RichardsW. D.Jr., A Coherent Systems Methodology for the Analysis of Human Communication Systems, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University, 1976.
25.
BerloD. K.FaraceR. V.MongueP. R.BettyS. A., and DanowskiJ. A., An Analysis of the Communications Structure of the Office of Civil Defense, Contract No. DAHC-2-70-C-0399, 1972.
26.
RogersE. and Agarwala-RogersR., Communication in Organizations, The Free Press, New York, 1976.
27.
RaoA. G., Quantitative Theories in Advertising, John Wiley, New York, 1970.
28.
MoutonJ. S.BlakeR. R., and FruchterB., The Reliability of Sociometric Measures, Sociometry, 18, pp. 7–48, 1955.
29.
MoutonJ. S.BlakeR. R., and FruchterB., The Validity of Sociometric Responses, Sociometry, 18, pp. 181–205, 1955.
30.
DixonT. C., Communication and Perceived Performance in Organizations: A Network Analysis, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, 1978.
31.
HeiseD. R., Problems in Path Analysis and Causal Inference, BorgattaE. (ed.), Sociological Methodology 1969, Jseey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 38–73, 1969.
32.
DraperN. R. and SmithH., Applied Regression Analysis, Wiley, New York, 1966.
33.
BlalockH. M.Jr. (ed.), Causal Models in the Social Sciences, Aldine, Chicago, 1971.
34.
HageJ., Techniques and Problems of Theory Construction in Sociology, John Wiley, New York, 1972.
35.
NilN. H.HullC. H.JenkinsJ. G.SteinbrunnerK., and BentD. H., Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, McGraw-Hill, New York, 2nd ed., 1975.
36.
BacharachS. B. and AikenM., Communication in Administrative Bureaucracies, Academy of Management Journal, 20, pp. 257–263, 1977.
37.
HanserL. M. and MuchinskyP. M., Work as an Information Environment, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 21, pp. 47–60, 1978.
38.
LawlerE. E., Job Attitudes and Employee Motivation: Theory, Research, and Practice, Personnel Psychology, 23, pp. 223–237, 1970.
