This study investigates the differences between the relationship between elderly occupational status and modernization for men and women. Consonant with previous findings [1], it finds that economic development is associated with relative losses of elderly men in professional and technical occupations. Augmenting those findings, however, it finds an even stronger association between development and such losses for women. In accounting for the differences, several explanations are advanced and tested, using data from fifty-one nations.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
CohnR. M., Economic Development and Status Change of the Aged, American Journal of Sociology, 87, pp. 1150–1161, 1982.
2.
CowgillD. O., “A Theory of Aging in Cross-Cultural Perspective,” in Aging and Modernization, CowgillD. O. and HolmesL. D. (eds.), Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1972.
3.
PalmoreE. and MantonK., Modernization and the Status of the Aged: International Correlations, Journal of Gerontology, 29, pp. 205–210, 1974.
4.
BalkwellC. and BalswickJ., Subsistence Economy, Family Structure and the Status of the Elderly, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 43, pp. 423–429, 1981.
5.
CowgillD. O., Aging and Modernization: A Revision of the Theory, in Late Life: Communities and Environmental Policy, GubriumJ. (ed.), Thomas, Springfield, Illinois, 1974.
6.
CowgillD. O., Aging Around the World, Wadsworth, Belmont, California, 1986.
7.
CowgillD. O. and HolmesL. D., Aging and Modernization, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1972.
8.
Ishii-KuntzM. and LeeG., Status of the Elderly: An Extension of the Theory, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 413–440, 1987.
9.
LeeG., Status of the Elderly: Economic and Familial Antecedents, Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, pp. 267–275, 1984.
10.
PalmoreE. and MaddoxG. L., Sociological Aspects of Aging, in Behavioral and Adaptation in Late Life, BusseE. and PfeifferE. (eds.), Little, Brown, Boston, 1977.
11.
DowdJ. J., Industrialization and the Decline of the Aged, Sociological Focus, 14, pp. 255–269, 1981.
12.
PalmoreE. and WittingtonF., Trends in the Relative Status of the Aged, Social Forces, 50, pp. 84–91, 1971.
13.
ChaneyE., Empowering Older Women: Cross-Cultural Views, Women's Initiative of the American Association of Retired Persons, Washington, D.C., 1990.
14.
ClarkR., Contrasting Perspectives on Women's Access to Prestigious Occupations: A Cross-National Investigation, Social Science Quarterly, 72, pp. 20–32, 1991.
15.
ClarkR., Multinational Corporate Investment and Women's Participation in Higher Education in Non-Core Countries, Sociology of Education, 65, pp. 37–47, 1992.
16.
LaslettP., The Demographic Scene—An Overview, in An Aging World: Dilemmas and Challenges for Law and Social Policy, EeeKelarrJ. and PearlD. (eds.), Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1989.
17.
ParsonsT., Structure and Process in Modern Societies, Free Press, Chicago, 1960.
18.
SmelserN., The Modernization of Social Relations, in Modernization, WeinerM. (ed.), Basic Books, New York, 1966.
19.
NashJ. and Fernandez-KellyM. P. (eds.), Women, Men and the International Division of Labor, State University of New York Press, Albany, 1983.
20.
JoekesS., Women in the World Economy, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987.
21.
WardK., Women Workers and Global Restructuring, ILR Press, Ithaca, 1990.
22.
United Nations, Demographic Yearbook, United Nations, New York, 1984.
23.
United Nations, Demographic Yearbook, United Nations, New York, 1988.
24.
World Bank, World Bank Development Report, 1987, Oxford University Press, New York, 1987.
25.
International Monetary Fund, Government Finance Statistics Yearbook, IMF, Washington, D.C., 1986.
26.
SivardR., Women … A World Survey, Carnegie, Ford and Rockefeller Foundations, New York, 1985.
