The present day computers represent a powerful tool for education. However, computer-based instructions are still lacking in mapping and map-related disciplines while textbooks with ancillary software have become commonplace. This article addresses generic problems and issues regarding the integration of computers into teaching for pedagogical and professional benefit. It describes the meaning and impact of computing from the perspective of cost-and-benefit concerns, appropriateness of technology, effective implementation, and adequacy of existing resources. Although the primary tradeoff between conventional and new methods of instruction is cost-effectiveness, there seems a greater need to redefining pedagogical aims and understanding the benefit of visual stimuli, especially maps, in an instructional setting.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
DellowD. A. and PooleL. H. (eds.), Microcomputer Applications in Administration and Instruction, New Directions for Community Colleges Series, 47, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1984.
2.
LymanP., The Computer Revolution in the Classroom: A Progress Report, Academic Computing, pp. 18–20, 43–46, March/April 1988.
3.
CookeD. F., Maps, Optical Discs, and Vehicle Navigation, in CD-ROM—The New Papyrus: The Current and Future State of the Art, Section VI: CD ROM Applications, LambertS. and RopiequetS. (eds.), Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, pp. 553–562, 1986.
4.
RhindD. and OpenshawS., The BBC Domesday System: A Nation-wide GIS for $4448, in Auto-Carto 8, ChrismanN. R. (ed.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Symposium on Computer Assisted Cartography, Baltimore, March 29-April 3, 1987, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing and American Congress on Surveying and Mapping, Falls Church, Virginia, pp. 595–603.
5.
GreenwellJ. C., The Application of Videodisc Technology to Mapping, The Cartographic Journal, 25, pp. 79–94, June 1988.
6.
HaywardV. J., From Museum to Monitor: The Visual Exploration of the Ancient World, Academic Computing, pp. 16–19, 69–71, May/June 1988.
7.
ThompsonD. T.CirrincioneJ., and LaiP. C., The Integrated Use of Picture, Map, and Graph Data in Computer Workstations for Instructors and Students for Improving Undergraduate Geographic Education, a final report submitted to the Instructional Computer Programs, Computer Science Center, University of Maryland at College Park, for Project B-4, Department of Geography, 1988.
8.
DeLoughryT. J., Videodiscs Gain a New Role in Classrooms as Medium to Simulate Real-Life Situations, The Chronicle of Higher Education, pp. A13, A16, December 2, 1987.
9.
BattyM., Teaching Spatial Modelling Using Interacting Computers and Interactive Computer Graphics, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 9: 1, pp. 25–35, 1985.
10.
BorkA., The Potential for Interactive Technology, Byte, pp. 201–295, February 1987.
11.
GoddardJ. and ArmstrongP., The 1986 Doomesday Project, Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series, 11, pp. 290–295, 1986.
12.
ShepherdI. D. H., Teaching Geography with the Computer: Possibilities and Problems, Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 9: 1, pp. 3–23, 1985.
13.
Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory, Evaluator's Guide for Microcomputer-Based Instructional Packages, The International Council for Computers in Education, University of Oregon, 1986.
14.
HoneyS. K. and WhileM. S., Cartographic Databases, in CD-ROM—The New Papyrus: The Current and Future State of the Art, Section V: CD ROM Applications, LambertS. and RopiequetS. (eds.), Microsoft Press, Redmond, Washington, pp. 563–572, 1986.
15.
DCI, Videodisc Map Products: Specifications and Standards, DCIC 10057–87, DCI/ICS 4083–87, May 1987.
16.
IEEE and TLC, Optical Discs: An Information Revolution, the 17th IEEE Video-conference Seminars via Satellite, College Park, Maryland, February 26, 1987.
17.
MortonB., Computer-Based Information: Online and On Disc, Library Hi Tech News, pp. 7–9, 36, 1987.
18.
MacKnightC. B. and BalagopalanS., Authoring Systems: Some Instructional — Implications, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17: 2, pp. 123–134, 1988–89.
19.
CummingA., Change, Organization, and Achievement: Teachers' Concerns in Implementing a Computer Learning Environment, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17: 2, pp. 141–163, 1988–89.
20.
GarsonG. D., Software Usership: A Look at Faculty Software Development from the Bottom Up, Academic Computing, pp. 20–52, October 1987.
21.
KearsleyG. and HalleyR., Designing Interactive Software, Release 2.0, Park Row Press, La Jolla, California, 1986.
22.
ForerP., Video and Data in Geography: An Initial Analysis of the Domesday Project Design in the United Kingdom, New Zealand Journal of Geography, pp. 19–23, April 1987.
23.
CantorJ. A., A Systems Approach to the Design and Development of Interactive Videodisc Training, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17: 4, pp. 255–271, 1988–89.
24.
DeppaJ., Interacting with Technology: Creating a Class in Interactive Media, Academic Computing, pp. 12–14, 44–45, September 1987.
25.
WinnB., Charts, Graphs, and Diagrams in Educational Materials, in The Psychology of Illustration, Vol. I: Basic Research, WillonsD. M. and HoughtonH. A. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 152–198, 1987.
26.
HeadJ. T. and MooreD. M., The Effects of Graphic Format on the Interpretation of Quantitative Data, Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 17: 4, pp. 337–343, 1988–89.
