Users of educational hypertext are faced with the challenge of creating meaning both within and between texts. Cohesion is an important factor contributing to whether a reader is able to capture meaning and comprehend text. When readers are required to fill in conceptual gaps in text, comprehension can fail if they do not have sufficient knowledge. Cohesion helps low-knowledge readers to create a more coherent mental representation of the text. However, text that is too cohesive can inhibit active processing, and thus reduce coherence for more knowledgeable readers. Similar patterns have been found for hypertext, which requires readers to create coherence between multiple electronic texts. Domain novices are in greater need of explicit pointers to important links between documents and gain from having less control over system navigation. Domain experts are in less need of scaffolding within the system. We discuss the use of a multimedia reading strategy training program to help low-knowledge readers better understand less cohesive text. Finally, we discuss four principles to guide hypertext development geared toward improving coherence and metacognitive engagement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AfflerbachP. (1986). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers' importance assignment process. In NilesJ. A. & MalikR. V. (Eds.), National reading conference yearbook 35. Solving problems in literacy: Learners, teachers and researchers (pp. 30–40). Rochester, NY: National Reading Conference.
2.
AlexanderP. (1997). Mapping the multidimensional nature of domain learning: The interplay of cognitive, motivational, and strategic forces. Advances in Motivation and Achievement, 10, 213–250.
3.
AlexanderP., & JettonT. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. In KamilM.MosenthalP.PearsonP., & BarrR. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3; pp. 285–310). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
4.
AzevedoR.GuthrieJ.WangH-Y., & MulhernJ. (2001, April). Do different instructional interventions facilitate students' ability to shift to more sophisticated mental models of complex systems?, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
5.
BakerL. (1996). Social influences on metacognitive development in reading. In CornoldiC. & OakhillJ. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties (pp. 331–352). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
BattigW. (1979). The flexibility of human memory. In CermakL. S. & CraikF. M. I. (Eds.), Levels of processing in human memory (pp. 23–44). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7.
BaumannJ. F.Seifert-KessellN., & JonesL. A. (1992). Effect of think-aloud instruction on elementary students' comprehension monitoring abilities. Journal of Reading Behavior, 24, 143–172.
8.
BeckI.McKeownM., & GromollE. (1989). Learning from social studies texts. Cognition and Instruction, 6, 99–158.
9.
BeckI. L.McKeownM. G.SinatraG. M., & LoxtermanJ. A. (1991). Revising social studies text from a text-processing perspective: Evidence of improved comprehensibility. Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 251–176.
10.
BereiterC., & BirdM. (1985). Use of thinking aloud in identification and teaching of reading comprehension strategies. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 131–156.
11.
BeyerR. (1990). Psychologische Untersuchungen zur Gestaltung von Instruktionstexten [Psychological studies concerning the construction of instructional texts]. Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftliche Reihe, 39, 69–75. (Scientific journal published by Humboldt University, Berlin.)
12.
BoekaertsM.PintrichP., & ZeidnerM. (20900). Handbook of self regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
13.
BowenB. A. (1999). Four puzzles in adult literacy: Reflections on the national adult literacy survey. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 42, 314–323.
14.
BrittM. A.RouetJ. F., & PerfettiC. A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In RouetJ. F.LevonenJ. J.DillonA. P., & SpiroR. J. (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 43–72). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15.
BrittonB. K., & GulgozS. (1991). Using Kintsch's computational model to improve instructional text: Effects of repairing inference calls on recall and cognitive structures. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 329–345.
16.
BrownA. (1982). Learning how to learn from reading. In LangerJ. A. & Smith-BurkeM. T. (Eds.), Reader meets author: Bridging the gap (pp. 26–54). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
17.
ChenC., & RadaR. (1996). Interacting with hypertext: A meta-analysis of experimental studies. Human-Computer Interaction, 11, 125–156.
18.
ChiM. T. H., & BassokM. (1989). Learning from examples via self-explanations. In ResnickL. B. (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 251–282). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
19.
ChiM.FeltovichP., & GlaserR. (1981). Categorization and representation of physics problems by experts and novices. Cognitive Science, 5, 121–1542.
20.
ChiM. T. H., & VanLehnK. A. (1991). The content of physics self-explanations. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 1, 69–105.
ChiesiH. I.SpilchG. J., & VossJ. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18, 275–290.
23.
ClarkR. C., & MayerR. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction. San Francisco, CA: Wiley.
24.
CotéN.GoldmanS. R., & SaulE. U. (1998). Students making sense of informational text: Relations between processing and representation. Discourse Processes, 25, 1–53.
25.
CraigS.GholsonB.VenturaM., Graesser, A. C., & The Tutoring Research Group. (2000). Overhearing dialogues and monologues in virtual tutoring sessions: Effects on questioning and vicarious learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 11, 242–253.
26.
DaveyB. (1983). Think aloud: Modeling the cognitive processes of reading comprehension. Journal of Reading, 27, 44–47.
27.
DewitzP.CarrE., & PatbergJ. (1987). Effects of interference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 99–121.
28.
EganD.RemdeJ.GomezL.LandauerT.EberhardtJ., & LochbaumB. (1986). Formative design-evaluation of Superbook. ACM Transactions of Information Systems, 7, 30–57.
29.
FoltzP. (1996). Comprehension, coherence, and strategies in hypertext and linear text. In RouetJ. F. & LevonenJ. (Eds.), Hypertext and Cognition (pp. 109–136). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30.
GarnhamA.OakhillJ. V., & Johnson-LairdP. N. (1982). Referential continuity and the coherence of discourse. Cognition, 11, 29–46.
31.
GraesserA. C.McNamaraD. S., & LouwerseM. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In SweetA. P. & SnowC. E. (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension. New York: Guilford Publications.
32.
HansenJ., & PearsonP. (1983). An instructional study: Improving the inferential comprehension of good and poor fourth-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 812–829.
33.
HealyA. F.ClawsonD. M.McNamaraD. S.MarmieW. R.SchneiderV. I.RickardT. C.CrutcherR. J.KingC.EricssonK. A., & BourneL. E.Jr. (1993). The long-term retention of knowledge and skills. In MedinD. (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 30; pp. 135–164). New York: Academic Press.
34.
HealyA. F., & SinclairG. P. (1996). The long-term retention of training and instruction. In BjorkE. L. & BjorkR. A. (Eds.), Handbook of perception and cognition (Vol. 10; pp. 525–564). New York: Academic Press.
35.
InstoneK.TeasleyB., & LeventhalL. (1993). Empirically-based re-design of a hypertext encyclopedia. Bridging the gap-INTERCHI'93 (pp. 500–506). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
36.
KauffmanD. (2002, April). Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate cognitive strategy use, metacognitive processing, and motivational beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
37.
KintschW. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163–182.
38.
KintschW. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
39.
LeeS., & LeeY. H. K. (1991). Effects of learner control versus program control strategies on computer-aided learning of chemistry problems: For acquisition or review?Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 491–489.
40.
LongD., & GoldingJ. (1993). Superordinate goal inferences: Are they automatically generated during comprehension?Discourse Processes, 16, 55–74.
41.
LongD. L.OppyB. J., & SeelyM. R. (1994). Individual differences in the time course of inferential processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1456–1470.
42.
LouwerseM. M. (2002). Computational retrieval of themes. In LouwerseM. M. & van PeerW. (Eds.), Thematics: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 189–212). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: Benjamins.
43.
LouwerseM. M., & GraesserA. C. (2004). Coherence in discourse. In StraznyP. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of linguistics. Chicago: Fitzroy Dearborn.
44.
LundebergM. (1987). Metacognitive aspects of reading comprehension: Studying understanding in legal case analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 407–432.
45.
MaglianoJ. P., & MillisK. K. (2003). Assessing reading skill with a think-aloud procedure. Cognition and Instruction, 21, 251–283.
46.
MaglianoJ. P.TodaroS.MillisK.Wiemer-HastingsK.KimH. J., & McNamaraD. S. (2005). Changes in reading strategies as a function of reading training: A comparison of live and computerized training. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 32, 185–208.
47.
MaglianoJ. P.TrabassoT., & GraesserA. C. (1999). Strategic processes during comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 615–629.
48.
MaglianoJ. P.Wiemer-HastingsK.MillisK. K.MuñozB. D., & McNamaraD. S. (2002). Using latent semantic analysis to assess reader strategies. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34, 181–188.
49.
MayerR. (2001). Multi-media learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
50.
McDanielM. A.BlischakD., & EinsteinG. O. (1995). Understanding the special mnemonic characteristics of fairy tales. In WeaverC. A.IIIMannesS., & FletcherC. R. (Eds.), discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 157–176). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
51.
McKendreeJ.StenningK.MayesT.LeeJ., & CoxR. (1998). Why observing a dialogue may benefit learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 110–119.
52.
McKeownM. G.BeckI. L.SinatraG. M., & LoxtermanJ. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27, 79–93.
53.
McNamaraD. S. (2001). Reading both high-coherence and low-coherence texts: Effects of text sequence and prior knowledge. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 51–62.
54.
McNamaraD. S. (2004, April). Promoting active reading strategies to improve undergraduate students' comprehension of science. Paper presented at the 85th Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association.
55.
McNamaraD. S. (2004a). Aprendiendo a través de los textos: Efectos de la estructura del texto y las estrategias de los lectores. Signos, 37, 123–159.
56.
McNamaraD. S. (2004b). SERT Self-explanation reading training. Discourse Processes, 38, 1–30.
57.
McNamaraD. S.BestR., & CastellanoC. (2004). Learning from text: Facilitating and enhancing comprehension. www.speechpathology.com.
58.
McNamaraD. S.BoonthumC.LevinsteinI., & MillisK. (in press). Evaluating self-explanations in iSTART: Comparing word-based and LSA systems. Chapter to appear in LandauerT.McNamaraD. S.DennisS., & KintschW. (Eds.), LSA: A road to meaning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
59.
McNamaraD. S., & KintschW. (1996). Learning from texts; Effects of prior knowledge and text coherence. Discourse Processes, 22, 247–288.
60.
McNamaraD. S.KintschE.SongerN., & KintschW. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14, 1–43.
61.
McNamaraD. S.LevinsteinI. B., & BoonthumC. (2004). iSTART: Interactive strategy training for active reading and thinking. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 222–223.
62.
McNamara, D. S., & The CSEP Lab. (2004). Promoting active reading strategies to improve undergraduate students' understanding of science. Annual project report submitted to the National Science Foundation IERI.
63.
McNamaraD. S., & ScottJ. L. (1999). Training reading strategies. In HahnM. & StonessS. C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-first Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 387–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64.
MeansM. L., & VossJ. F. (1985). Star wars: A developmental study of expert and novice knowledge structures. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 746–757.
65.
MelaraG. (1996). Investigating learning styles on different hypertext environments: Hierarchical-like and network-like structures. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 313–328.
66.
MillisK.MaglianoJ.Wiemer-HastingsK.TodaroS., & McNamaraD. S. (in press). Assessing comprehension with Latent Semantic Analysis. Chapter to appear in LandauerT.McNamaraD. S.DennisS., & KintschW. (Eds.), LSA: A road to meaning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
67.
NielsenJ. (1989). The matters that really matter for hypertext usability. SIGCHI Bulletin, November (pp. 238–248).
68.
NormanD., & DraperS. (1986). User centered system design: New perspectives on human-computer interaction. Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum Associates.
69.
OakhillJ. (1983). Instantiation in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35, 441–450.
70.
OakhillJ. (1984). Inferential and memory skills in children's comprehension of stories. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 31–39.
71.
OakhillJ., & YuillN. (1996). Higher order factors in comprehension disability: Processes and remediation. In CornaldiC. & OakhillJ. (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
72.
OakhillJ.YuillN., & DonaldsonM. (1990). Understanding of causal expressions in skilled and less skilled text comprehenders. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 8, 401–410.
73.
O'ReillyT. P.BestR., & McNamaraD. S. (2004). Self-explanation reading training: Effects for low-knowledge readers. In ForbusK.GentnerD., & RegierT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1053–1058). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
74.
O'ReillyT. P., & McNamaraD. S. (in press). Good texts can be better for skilled comprehenders. Discourse Processses.
75.
O'ReillyT. P.SinclairG. P., & McNamaraD. S. (2004a). iSTART: A web-based reading strategy intervention that improves students' science comprehension. In KinshukD. G. Sampson, & IsaíasP. (Eds.), Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference Cognition and Exploratory Learning in Digital Age: CELDA 2004 (pp. 173–180). Lisbon, Portugal: IADIS Press.
76.
O'ReillyT.SinclairG. P., & McNamaraD. S. (2004b). Reading strategy training: Automated versus live. In ForbusK.GentnerD., & RegierT. (Eds.), Proceedings of the twenty-sixth annual meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 1059–1064). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
77.
PalincsarA. S., & BrownA. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 2, 117–175.
78.
ParisS., & ParisA. (2001). Classroom applications of research on self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 36, 89–101.
SchnackenbergH. L., & SullivanH. J. (2000). Learner control over full and lean computer-based instruction under differing ability levels. Educational Technology Research and Development, 48, 19–35.
81.
ShapiroA. M. (1998a). The relationship between prior knowledge and interactive organizers during hypermedia-aided learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20, 143–163.
82.
ShapiroA. M. (1998b). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1–35.
83.
ShapiroA. M. (1999). The relevance of hierarchies to learning biology from hypertext. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 8, 215–243.
84.
ShapiroA. M. (2000). The effect of interactive overviews on the development of conceptual structure in novices learning from electronic texts. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9, 57–78.
85.
ShapiroA. M. (2004). How including prior knowledge as a subject variable can change outcomes of learning research. American Educational Research Journal, 41, 159–189.
86.
ShapiroA. M., & NiederhauserD. S. (2003). Learning from hypertext: Research issues and findings. In JonassenD. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (2nd ed.; pp. 605–620).
87.
ShebilskeW.JordanJ.GoettlB., & PaulusL. (1998). Observation versus hands-on practice of complex skills in dyadic, triadic, and tetradic training-teams. Human Factors, 40, 525–540.
88.
SimpsonA., & McKnightC. (1990). Navigation in hypertext: Structural cues and mental maps. In McAleeseR. & GreenC. (Eds.), Hypertext: State of the Art (pp. 73–83). Oxford: Intellect.
SingerM., & RitchotK. (1996). The role of working memory capacity and knowledge access in text inference processing. Memory & Cognition, 24, 733–743.
91.
SnowC. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward and R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
92.
SolowayE.GuzdialM., & HayK. (1984). Learner-centered design: The challenge for HCI in the 21st century. Interactions, 1(2), 36–48.
93.
SpiroR.FeltovichP.JacobsonM., & CoulsonR. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31, 24–33.
94.
SteinbergE. (1989). Cognition and learner control: A literature review, 1977–1988. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16, 117–121.
95.
TrabassoT., & MaglianoJ. P. (1996). How do children understand what they read and what can we do to help them? In GravesM.van den BroekP., & TaylorB. (Eds.), The first R: A right of all children (pp. 160–188). New York: Columbia University Press.
96.
TrumbullD.GayG., & MazurJ. (1992). Students' actual and perceived use of navigational and guidance tools in a hypermedia program. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 24, 315–328.
97.
Van LehnK.JonesR. M., & ChiM. T. H. (1992). A model of the self-explanation effect. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 2, 1–59.
98.
VygotskyL. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: MIT Press.
99.
WaltzJ. (2001). Reading hypertext: Lower level processes. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57, 475–494.
100.
WengerM. J., & PayneD. G. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 93–130.
101.
WhitneyP.RitchieB., & ClarkM. (1991). Working memory capacity and the use of elaborative inferences in text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 14, 133–145.
102.
WilsonP. T., & AndersonR. C. (1986). What they don't know will hurt them: The role of prior knowledge in comprehension. In OrasanuJ. (Ed.), Reading comprehension: From research to practice (pp. 31–48). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
103.
WinneP. H. (1995). Inherent details in self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 30, 173–187.
104.
WinneP. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In ZimmermanB. J. & SchunkD. H. (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice (pp. 153–189). New York: Longman.
105.
YuillN., & OakhillJ. (1988). Understanding of anaphoric relations in skilled and less skilled comprehenders. British Journal of Psychology, 79, 173–186.
106.
YuillN.OakhillJ., & ParkinA. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 351–361.
