This study was designed to evaluate the effectiveness of a province-wide chemical abuse prevention education program for grades two through six. Two separate studies were conducted. Study 1 measured pre- and post-scores on a test with 1101 experimental and 991 control subjects in a quasi-experimental design. Study 2 surveyed 500 elementary school teachers on their opinions and practices regarding drug education, and on the prevalence of the program in schools. The study found that: 1) students had a high initial knowledge level; 2) students showed modest but statistically significant knowledge gains for urban schools and grades three, four, and five of rural schools; 3) the program was most effective with students with a low base knowledge; 4) an estimated 20 to 30 percent of Manitoba elementary teachers had been in-serviced and/or were using the program across the province; and 5) the program was received well among teachers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
MilgramG. G., Alcohol and Drug Education Programs, Journal of Drug Education, 17, pp. 43–55, 1987.
2.
BotvinG. J., Substance Abuse Prevention Research: Recent Developments and Future Directions, Journal of School Health, 56, pp. 369–374, 1986.
3.
MoskowitzJ. M.MalvinJ. H.SchaefferG. A., and SchapsE., An Experimental Evaluation of a Drug Education Course, Journal of Drug Education, 14, pp. 9–22, 1984.
4.
ThompsonM. L.DaughertyR., and CarverV., Alcohol Education in Schools: Toward a Lifestyle Risk-Reduction Approach, Journal of School Health, 54, pp. 79–83, 1984.
5.
GonzalezG. M., Alcohol Education Can Prevent Alcohol Problems: A Summary of Some Unique Research Findings, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 27: 3, pp. 2–12, 1982.
6.
National Institute on Drug Abuse, Fifth Special Report to the U. S. Congress on Alcohol and Health, U. S. Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, Massachusetts, 1983.
7.
SmartR. G. and OgborneA. C., Northern Spirits Drinking in Canada: Then and Now, Addiction Research Foundation, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 1986.
8.
Bangert-DrownsR. L., The Effects of School Based Substance Abuse Education: A Mete-Analysis, Journal of Drug Education, 18, pp. 243–264, 1988.
9.
GoodstadtM. S., School-Based Drug Education in North America: What Is Wrong? What Can Be Done?, Journal of School Health, 56, pp. 578–581, 1986.
10.
SchapsE.DiBartoloR.MoskowitzJ.PalleyC. S., and ChurginS., A Review of 127 Drug Abuse Prevention Program Evaluations, Journal of Drug Issues, 9, pp. 17–43, 1981.
11.
HansonD. J., The Effectiveness of Alcohol and Drug Education, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 27, pp. 1–13, 1982.
12.
WeisheitR. A., The Social Context of Alcohol and Drug Education: Implications for Program Evaluations, Journal of Alcohol and Drug Education, 29, pp. 72–81, 1983.
13.
FlayB. and SobelJ., The Role of Mass Media in Preventing Adolescent. Substance Abuse, in Preventing Adolescent Drug Abuse: Intervention Strategies, GlynnT. J.LeukefeldG. G., and LudfordJ. P. (eds.), U. S. Government Printing Office, Superintendent of Documents, Washington, D.C., (NIDA Research Monograph No. 47, DHEW Pub. No. (ADM) 83-1280), 1983.
14.
SheppardM. A.GoodstadtM. S., and WilliamsonB., Drug Education: Why We Have So Little Impact, Journal of Drug Education, 15, pp. 1–5, 1985.
15.
SwadiH. and ZeitlinH., Drug Education to School Children: Does It Really Work?, British Journal of Addiction, 82, pp. 741–746, 1987.
16.
ConnellD. B.TurnerR. R., and MasonE. F., Summary of Findings of the School Health Education Evaluation: Health Promotion, Effectiveness, Implementation, and Costs, Journal of School Health, 55, pp. 316–321, 1985.
17.
GunnW. J.IversonD. C., and KatzM., Design of the School Health Education Evaluation, Journal of School Health, 55, pp. 301–304, 1985.
18.
ConnellD. B. and TurnerR. R., The Impact of Instructional Experience and the Effects of Cumulative Instruction, Journal of School Health, 55, pp. 324–331, 1985.
19.
DiCiccoL.BironR.CarifioJ.DeutschC.MillsD. J.OrensteinA.UnterbergerR. H., and WhiteR. E., Evaluation of the CASPAR Alcohol Education Curriculum, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 45, pp. 160–169, 1984.
20.
GoodstadtM. S.SheppardM. A., and ChanG. C., An Evaluation of Two School-Based Alcohol Education Programs, Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 43, pp. 352–369, 1982.
21.
ForsS. W. and DorsterM. E., Implication of Results: Factors for Success, Journal of School Health, 55, pp. 332–334, 1985.
22.
LohrmannD. K. and ForsS. W., Can School-Based Educational Programs Really Be Expected to Solve the Adolescent Drug Abuse Problem?, Journal of Drug Education, 16, pp. 327–339, 1986.
23.
StropleM. J. and KossD., Tuning In To Health: Alcohol and Other Drug Decisions, Alcoholism Foundation of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1986.
24.
SaranchukR. and KossD., Tuning In To Health: Alcohol and Other Drug Decision for Junior High Students, Alcoholism Foundation of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1986.
25.
KearneyA. L. and HinesM. H., Evaluation of the Effectiveness of a Drug Prevention Education Program, Journal of Drug Education, 10, pp. 127–134, 1980.
26.
SudmanS. and BradburnN., Improving Mailed Questionnaire Design, in Making Effective Use of Mailed Questionnaires, LockhartD. C. (ed.), New Directions for Program Evaluation, No. 21, Jossey-Base, San Francisco, 1984.
27.
Manitoba Education, Schools in Manitoba/Ecoles du Manitoba, ManitobaEducation Communications Branch, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1986–87.
28.
GameyD. L., The Effectiveness of the Concerns-Based Adoption Model in Implementing a Drug Prevention Program, unpublished master's thesis, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1985.
