Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online December, 1997
Analysis of a Global Online Debate and the Development of an Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing
This study attempts to find appropriate interaction analysis/content analysis techniques that assist in examining the negotiation of meaning and co-construction of knowledge in collaborative learning environments facilitated by computer conferencing. The authors review strengths and shortcomings of existing interaction analysis techniques and propose a new model based on grounded theory building for analyzing the quality of CMC interactions and learning experiences. This new Interaction Analysis Model for Examining Social Construction of Knowledge in Computer Conferencing was developed after proposing a new definition of “interaction” for the CMC context and after analyzing interactions that occurred in a Global Online Debate. The application of the new model for analysis of collaborative construction of knowledge in the online debate and in a subsequent computer conference are discussed and future research suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
LevinJ.KimH., and RielM., Analyzing Instructional Interactions on Electronic Message Networks, Online Education, HarasimL. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 185–213, 1990.
2.
HiltzS., Evaluating the Virtual Classroom, Online Education, HarasimL. (ed.), Praeger, New York, pp. 133–184, 1990.
3.
MasonR., Methodologies for Evaluating Applications of Computer Conferencing, in Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing, KayeA. R. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, FRG, 1991.
4.
GubaE. and LincolnY., Effective Evaluation, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, California, 1981.
5.
JonassenD., Thinking Technology: Toward a Constructivist Design Model, Educational Technology, pp. 34–37, April 1994.
6.
AndersonT., The Virtual Conference: Extending Professional Education in Cyberspace, International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 2: 2/3, pp. 121–135, 1996.
7.
GunawardenaC.LoweC., and AndersonT., The Design, Implementation and Evaluation of a Worldwide On-Line Debate, VI Congreso Internacional: Tecnologia y Educacion a Distancia, Memoria, Editorial Universidad Estatal a Distancia, San Jose, Costa Rica, pp. 195–206, 1995.
HenriF., Computer Conferencing and Content Analysis, in Collaborative Learning through Computer Conferencing: The Najaden Papers, KayeA. (ed.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 117–136, 1992.
10.
NewmanD. R.WebbB., and CochraneC., A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 3: 2, pp. 56–77, 1995. Archived as NEWMAN IPCTV3N2 on LISTSERV@GUVM (LISTSERV@GUVM.GEORGETOWN.EDU)
11.
NewmanD. R.JohnsonC.CochraneC., and WebbB., An Experiment in Group Learning Technology: Evaluating Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Seminars, Interpersonal Computing and Technology: An Electronic Journal for the 21st Century, 4: 1, pp. 57–74, 1996. Archived as NEWMAN IPCTV4N1 on LISTSERV@GUVM (LISTSERV@GUVM.GEORGETOWN.EDU)
12.
GarrisonD. R., Critical Thinking and Self-Directed Learning in Adult Education: An Analysis of Responsibility and Control Issues, Adult Education Quarterly, 42: 3, pp. 136–148, 1992.
13.
JordanB. and HendersonA., Interaction Analysis: Foundations and Practice, The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 4: 1, pp. 39–103, 1995.
14.
SalomonG., No Distribution without Individuals' Cognition: A Dynamic Interactional View, in Distributed Cognitions, SalomonG. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 111–138, 1993.
15.
PeaR. D., Practices of Distributed Intelligence and Designs for Education, in Distributed Cognitions, SalomonG. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 47–87, 1993.
16.
VygotskyL. S., Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1978.
17.
SmithJ. B., Collective Intelligence in Computer-Based Collaboration, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1994.
BrownJ. S.CollinsA., and DuguidP., Situated Cognition and the Culture of Learning, Educational Researcher, 18, pp. 32–42, 1989.
20.
JonassenD.MayesT., and McAleeseR., A Manifesto for a Constructivist Approach to Technology in Higher Education, in Designing Environments for Constructive Learning, DuffyT.LowyckJ., and JonassenD. (eds.), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1993. URL: http://www.icbl.hw.ac.uk/ctiymsc/ceejwl/paper11.html.
21.
LakoffG., Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1987.
22.
FestingerL., A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance, Row, Peterson, Evanston, Illinois, 1957.
23.
AndersonT. and KanukaH., Evaluating the Workplace Center On-Line Forum: Knowledge Construction and Learning Communities, unpublished research report. Office of the Learning Technologies, Human Resources Development Canada, Ottawa, Canada.
