Workers' rights violations in the United States are widespread and growing. The bulk of the National Labor Relations Board's work now involves unfair labor practices, most related to employers' violations of workers' rights. Numerous research studies document these violations. As part of its report “Unfair Advantage: Workers' Freedom of Association in the United States under International Human Rights Standards,” Human Rights Watch conducted a series of case studies in a dozen states, covering a variety of industries and employment sectors, analyzing the U.S. experience in the light of both national law and international human rights and labor rights norms. The article presented here includes a discussion of the general context of increased workers' rights violations under U.S. law and the first of the case studies: service sector workers.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
St. AntoineT., Federal regulation of the workplace in the next half century. Chicago Kent Law Rev. 61: 631, 1985.
2.
National Labor Relations Board.1998 Annual Report. Washington, D.C., 1998.
3.
Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations of the House Committee on Education and Labor, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. Report on Pressures in Today's Workplace. Washington, D.C., 1980.
4.
Subcommittee on Labor-Management Relations of the House Committee on Education and Labor, 98th Congress. The Failure of Labor Law: A Betrayal of American Workers. Washington, D.C., 1984.
5.
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor-Management Relations.U.S. Labor Law and the Future of Labor-Management Cooperation. Report No. 134. Washington, D.C., 1989.
6.
WeilerP., Promises to keep: Securing workers' right to self-organization under the NLRA. Harvard Law Rev. 96: 1769, 1983.
7.
HurdR. W.Assault on Workers' Rights, p. iv. Report for the Dunlop Commission. Washington, D.C., 1994.
8.
U.S. Department of Labor, U.S.Department of Commerce, Commission on the Future of Worker-Management Relations [Dunlop Commission]. Fact Finding Report. Washington, D.C., May 1994.
9.
Commission for Labor Cooperation.Plant Closings and Labor Rights. 1997. www.naalc.org
10.
MorrisC. J., A tale of two statutes: Discrimination for union activity under the NLRA and RLA. Employment Rights and Policy J.2: 327, 1998.
11.
FreemanR. B., and RogersJ.What Workers Want. Russell Sage Foundation, 1999.
12.
Parker-Robb Chevrolet, Inc. v. Automobile Salesmen's Union, 262 NLRB 402, petition for review denied sub. nom Automobile Salesmen's Local 1095 v. NLRB., 711 F.2d. 383 (D.C. Cir. 1983).
13.
EpsteinR., A common law for labor relations: A critique of New Deal labor legislation. Yale Law J.92: 1357, 1983.
14.
EpsteinR., In defense of the contract at will. University of Chicago Law Rev. 51: 947, 1984.
15.
YagerD. V.BartlT. J., and LoBueJ. L.Employee Free Choice: It's Not In The Cards; How Organized Labor Uses Authorization Cards to Avoid Secret Ballot Elections on the Question of Unionization. Labor Policy Association, 1998.
16.
YagerD. V.Has Labor Law Failed? An Examination of Congressional Oversight and Legislative Proposals, 1968–1990. National Foundation for the Study of Employment Policy, 1990.
17.
IrvingJ. S.Permanent striker replacements should not be banned. Government Union Rev., Spring 1993.
18.
TroyL., Is the U.S. unique in the decline of private sector unionism?J. Labor Res. 11: 111, 1990.
19.
TroyL., Convergence in international unionism, etc.: The case of Canada and the USA. Br. J. Indust. Relations.30: 1, 1992.
20.
TroyL.Beyond unions and collective bargaining. Working USA, January-February 2000, p. 102.
21.
AdamsL.The hazards of eldercare: Overexertion, assault put aides at high risk for injury. Washington Post, October 31, 1999, p. Al.
22.
National Labor Relations Board.Decision, Order, and Direction of Second Election, Palm Garden of North Miami and UNITE, 327 NLRB No. 195, March 31, 1999.
23.
RohrlichT.Living wage movement targets county government: Low-paid contract workers use costly public benefits, backers say. Los Angeles Times, November 4, 1998, p. B1.
24.
U.S. General Accounting Office.Welfare Reform: State and Local Responses to Restricting Food Stamp Benefits. Report RCED-98-41. Washington, D.C., 1998.
25.
SylvainM.Human Rights Watch interview, Miami, Florida, July 22, 1999.
26.
Palm Garden worker.Human Rights Watch interview, Miami, Florida, July 22, 1999.
27.
Villa Maria worker.Human Rights Watch interview, Miami, Florida, July 23, 1999.
28.
National Conference of Catholic Bishops/United States Catholic Conference.A Fair and Just Workplace: Principles and Practices for Catholic Health Care. August 25, 1999.
29.
Decision of Administrative Law Judge Robert C. Batson, Villa Maria Nursing and Rehabilitation Center, Inc. and the Service Master Company and UNITE! Union of Needletrades, Industrial and Textile Employees, Cases 12-CA-18137, 12-RC-7957, January 9, 1998.
30.
Villa Maria worker.Human Rights Watch interview, Miami, Florida, July 23, 1999.
31.
ParhamJ.Human Rights Watch interview, Miami, Florida, July 23, 1999.
32.
National Labor Relations Board Region 12. Complaint and Notice of Hearing, The Palace at Kendall and Home Nurse Corp., Case 12-CA-19278, August 28, 1998.
33.
AlizaJ.Human Rights Watch interview, Palm Beach, Florida, July 24, 1999.
34.
National Labor Relations Board.Decision and Order, PVMI Associates, Inc. D/b/a King David Center et al. and 1115 Nursing Home Hospital & Service Employees Union-Florida, 328 NLRB No. 159, August 6, 1999.
35.
DuvalE.Human Rights Watch interview, Palm Beach, Florida, July 24, 1999.
36.
National Labor Relations Board Region 12. Draft Settlement Agreement, Greenwood Rehabilitation Center (formerly King David Center), Cases 12-CA-16368 et al., December 1999.
37.
EwartD.Human Rights Watch telephone interview, Miami, Florida, March 15, 2000.
38.
DuvalE.Human Rights Watch telephone interview, North Miami, Florida, March 20, 2000.
39.
National Labor Relations Board Region 12. Hearing Officer's Report on Objections to Rerun Election with Findings and Recommendations, Case No. 12-RC-8275, May 21, 1999.
40.
PierreM.Human Rights Watch telephone interview, Lantana, Florida, March 8, 2000.
41.
ReuterJ.Human Rights Watch telephone interview, Riviera Beach, Florida, March 8, 2000.
42.
National Labor Relations Board Region 20. Settlement Agreement, Marriott International, Inc., Cases 20-CA-28111 et al., April 15, 1999.
GreenhouseS.Labor rolls on in Las Vegas, where hotel union is a national model. New York Times, April 27, 1998, p. Al.
45.
AmberM.First pact between HERE, MGM Grand calls for on-site child care facility. Daily Labor Report, p. A-1. Bureau of National Affairs, November 21, 1997.
46.
National Labor Relations Board Region 19. Order Consolidating Cases, Consolidated Complaints and Notice of Hearing, Stemilt Growers, Inc., Case No. 19-CA-25403 et al.
47.
National Labor Relations Board Region 19. Agreement, Stemilt Growers, Inc. and International Brotherhood of Teamsters, April 23, 1999.
48.
DarceK.Deal gives union good shot at organizing Avondale yard: New managers take fresh tack. New Orleans Times-Picayune, November 3, 1999, p. C1.
49.
DarceK.Avondale to become union yard: Long labor dispute is over. New Orleans Times-Picayune, December 1, 1999, p. A1.
50.
HERE Local 2 v. Marriott Corporation, 961 F.2d. 1464 (9th Cir., 1992), p. 3.
51.
National Labor Relations Board Region 20. Settlement Agreement, Marriott International, Inc.
52.
SanchezG.Human Rights Watch telephone interview, San Francisco, California, January 12, 1999.
53.
PalladinoG. J.SeniorVP. Letter to Human Rights Watch, February 10, 2000. On file with Human Rights Watch.
54.
DeWareH.Workplace rules at core of dispute between Marriott and hotel union. San Francisco Chronicle, February 18, 1999, p. B1.
