Despite claims for at least the past quarter century of mature professional status for the field of technical communication, studies in the history and sociology of the professions provide criteria that suggest we are not yet truly a profession. This article reviews economic, sociopolitical, and ideological factors that characterize the modern professions and argues that the technical communication field, at best, only partially meets the criteria. The prospects for professional status of technical communication might be improved by developing a critical consciousness of the processes of professionalization and concertedly acting in ways that facilitate those processes.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
GramsciA., Selections from the Prison Notebooks of Antonio Gramsci, International Publishers, New York, 1971.
2.
ConnorsR. J., The Rise of Technical Writing Instruction in America, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 12: 4, pp. 329–352, 1982.
3.
HaysR., What Is Technical Writing? in The Teaching of Technical Writing, CunninghamD. H. and EstrinH. A. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 3–8, 1975.
4.
BrittonW. E., What Is Technical Writing? A Redefinition, in The Teaching of Technical Writing, CunninghamD. H. and EstrinH. A. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 9–14, 1975.
5.
FryeJ., Credo of a Technical Writer, in The Technical Reader: Readings in Technical, Business and Scientific Communication, AndersonW. S. and CoxD. R. (eds.), Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 25–27, 1980.
6.
McLeanD. M., The Demands of Industry on the Technical Writer, in The Teaching of Technical Writing, CunninghamD. H. and EstrinH. A. (eds.), National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, Illinois, pp. 145–152, 1975.
7.
GouldJ. R. and LosanoW. A., Opportunities in Technical Writing Today, Vocational Guidance Manuals, Inc., Louisville, 1975.
8.
OhmannR., English in America: A Radical View of the Profession, Oxford University Press, New York, 1976.
9.
GeislerC., Academic Literacy and the Nature of Expertise: Reading, Writing, and Knowing in Academic Philosophy, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1994.
10.
VeyseyL. R., The Emergence of the American University, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1965.
11.
BurrageM.JarauschK., and SiegristH., An Actor-Based Framework for the Study of the Professions, in Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, BurrageM. and TorstendahlR. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 203–225, 1990.
12.
BeckmanS., Professionalization: Borderline Authority and Autonomy in Work, in Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, BurrageM. and TorstendahlR. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 115–138, 1990.
13.
CollinsR., Market Closure and the Conflict Theory of the Professions, in Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, BurrageM. and TorstendahlR. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 24–43, 1990.
14.
LarsonM. S., In the Matter of Experts and Professionals, or How Impossible It Is to Leave Nothing Unsaid, in The Formation of Professions: Knowledge, State and Strategy, TorstendahlR. and BurrageM. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 24–50, 1990.
15.
LaytonE. T.Jr., The Revolt of the Engineers: Social Responsibility and the American Engineering Profession, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, 1986.
16.
SiegristH., Professionalization as a Process: Patterns, Progression and Discontinuity, in Professions in Theory and History: Rethinking the Study of the Professions, BurrageM. and TorstendahlR. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 177–202, 1990.
17.
HaskellT. L., Professional Communities, in The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, HaskellT. L. (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 177–179, 1984.
18.
HaskellT. L., Introduction, in The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, HaskellT. L. (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. ix–xxxix, 1984.
19.
FriedsonE., Professional Powers: A Study of Institutionalization of Formal Knowledge, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1986.
20.
ZimmermanD. E. and MuraskiM. L., Reflecting on the Technical Communicator's Image, Technical Communication, 42: 4, pp. 621–623, 1995.
21.
DanielsP., Job Competencies Committee: Defining Who We Are, Intercom, 43: 8, p. 28, 1996.
22.
Schriver Speaks on TC Expertise, posTComm, 11, p. 13, 1998.
23.
MillerC. R., What's Practical About Technical Writing? in Technical Writing: Theory and Practice, FearingB. E. and SparrowW. K. (eds.), Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp. 14–24, 1989.
24.
CarlinerS., Evolution-Revolution: Toward a Strategic Perception of Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 43: 3, pp. 266–276, 1996.
25.
SeeE. J., Technical Communication: A Profession?Intercom, 44: 10, p. 3, 1997.
26.
LittleS. B., Designing Certificate Programs in Technical Communication, in Foundations for Teaching Technical Communication: Theory, Practice, and Program Design, StaplesK. and OrnatowskiC. (eds.), Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 273–285, 1997.
27.
SavageG. J., Redefining the Responsibilities of Teachers and the Social Position of the Technical Communicator, Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 3, pp. 309–327, 1996.
28.
LarsonM. S., The Production of Expertise and the Constitution of Expert Power, in The Authority of Experts: Studies in History and Theory, HaskellT. L. (ed.), Indiana University Press, Bloomington, pp. 28–80, 1984.
29.
SpanierS. W., How Can Technical Writers Further Their Professional Development? in Solving Problems in Technical Writing, BeeneL. and WhiteP. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 206–234, 1988.
30.
BreuningerC. L., The DuPont Experience: Strategic Planning for Information Design and Development Organizations, Technical Communication, 44: 4, pp. 394–400, 1997.
31.
MeadJ., Measuring the Value Added by Technical Documentation: A Review of Research and Practice, Technical Communication, 45: 3, pp. 353–379, 1998.
32.
HackosJ. T., Managing Your Documentation Projects, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1994.
33.
HenryJ., Documenting Contributory Expertise: The Value Added by Technical Communicators in Collaborative Writing Situations, Technical Communication, 45: 2, pp. 207–220, 1998.
34.
HayhoeG. F., What Research Do We Need, and Why Should Practitioners Care?Technical Communication, 44: 1, pp. 19–21, 1997.
35.
PinelliT. E. and BarclayR. O., Research in Technical Communication: Perspectives and Thoughts on the Process, Technical Communication, 39: 4, pp. 526–532, 1992.
36.
BeardJ. D. and WilliamsD. L., A Survey of Practitioners' Attitudes Toward Research in Technical Communication, Technical Communication, 39: 4, pp. 571–581, 1992.
37.
CarlinerS., A Call to Research, Technical Communication, 41: 4, pp. 615–619, 1994.
38.
WahlstromB., Designing a Research Program in Scientific and Technical Communication: Setting Standards and Defining the Agenda, in Foundations for Teaching Technical Communication: Theory, Practice, and Program Design, StaplesK. and OrnatowskiC. (eds.), Ablex, Greenwich, Connecticut, pp. 299–315, 1997.
39.
JonesD., A Question of Identity, Technical Communication, 42: 4, pp. 567–569, 1995.
40.
TorstendahlR., Introduction: Promotion and Strategies of Knowledge-Based Groups, in The Formation of Professions: Knowledge, State and Strategy, TorstendahlR. and BurrageM. (eds.), Sage, Newbury Park, California, pp. 1–10, 1990.
41.
HayhoeG., Technical Communication: A Trivial Pursuit?Technical Communication, 46: 1, pp. 23–25, 1999.
42.
ParkerW. R., Where Do English Departments Come From? in The Writing Teacher's Sourcebook (2nd Edition), TateG. and CorbettE. P. J. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, pp. 3–15, 1988.
43.
RiversW. E., Studies in the History of Business and Technical Writing: A Bibliographical Essay, in Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, KynellT. C. and MoranM. G. (eds.), Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, pp. 249–307, 1999.
44.
BrockmannR. J., From Millwrights to Shipwrights to the Twenty-First Century: Explorations in a History of Technical Communication in the United States, Hampton Press, Cresskill, New Jersey, 1998.
45.
WhiteH., The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality, in On Narrative, MitchellW. J. T. (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 1–23, 1981.
46.
EagletonT., Ideology: An Introduction, Verso, London, 1991.
47.
KynellT. C. and MoranM. G., Three Keys to the Past: The History of Technical Communication, Ablex, Stamford, Connecticut, 1999.
48.
BazermanC., The Languages of Edison's Light, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1999.
49.
HallS., Gramsci's Relevance for the Study of Race and Ethnicity, Journal of Communication Inquiry, 10, pp. 5–27, 1986.
50.
SavageGerald J., Doing Unto Others through Technical Communication Internship Programs, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 27: 4, pp. 401–416, 1997.
51.
SavageGerald J., Redefining the Responsibilities of Teachers and the Social Position of the Technical Communicator, Technical Communication Quarterly, 5: 3, pp. 309–327, 1996.
52.
FlynnElizabeth A., Gerald Savage, Marsha Penti, Carol Brown, and Sarah Watke, Gender and Modes of Collection in a Chemical Engineering Design Course, Journal of Business and Technical Communication, 5: 4, pp. 444–462, 1991.
