The purpose of this study was to measure the relative effectiveness of two methods of teaching drug education to preservice elementary school teachers. The methods compared were the traditional teacher confined approach, and the value clarification group-centered process. The latter approach was found to be superior in all ways measured. Members of this group read more independently, achieved greater gain scores in affective and cognitive testing, and they developed a sense of community that brought them together to solve problems.
HusbandR. W., A statistical comparison of the efficacy of large lecture versus smaller recitation sections upon achievement in general psychology, Journal of Psychology, 31: 297–300, 1951.
3.
GuetzkowH.KellyE. L., and McKeachieW. J., An experimental comparison of recitation, discussion and tutorial methods in college teaching, Journal of Educational Psychology, 45: 193–207, 1954.
4.
LyleE., An exploration in the teaching of critical thinking in general psychology, Journal of Educational Research, 52: 129–133, 1958.
5.
BurkeH. R., An experimental study of teaching methods in college freshman orientation course. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Boston University, 1955.
6.
LandsmanT., An experimental study of a student centered learning method. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University, 1950.
7.
BillsR. E., Investigation of student centered teaching, Journal of Educational Research, 46: 313–319, 1952.
8.
MaloneyR. M., Group learning through group discussion implementation analysis, Journal of Social Psychology, 43: 3–9, 1956.
9.
KrumboltzJ. D. and FarquharW. W., The effect of three teaching methods on achievement and motivational outcomes in a how-to-study course, Psychological Monographs, 71: 14, 1957.
10.
SmithH. C. and JohnsonD., An experimental study of attitudes and achievement in the democratic classroom, Paper presented at A.P.A., 1961.
11.
BurkeH. R., An experimental study of teaching methods in college freshman orientation course, Doctoral dissertation—Dissertation Abstracts, 16: 77–78, 1956.
12.
WispeL. G., Evaluating section teaching methods in the introductory course, Journal of Educational Research, 45: 161–186, 1951.
13.
HaighG. V. and SchmidtW., The learning of subject matter in teacher centered and group centered classes, Journal of Educational Psychology, 47: 295–301, 1956.
14.
FawV. A., A psychotherapeutic method of teaching psychology, American Psychologist, 4: 104–109, 1949.
15.
ZelenyL. D., Experimental appraisal of a group learning plan, Journal of Educational Research, 34: 37–42, 1940.
16.
MooreM. R. and PophamW. J., The role of extra-class student interviews in promoting student achievement, Paper presented at A.E.R.A., Chicago, 1960.
17.
PattonJ. A., A study of the effects of student acceptance of responsibility and motivation in course behavior, Doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, 1955.
18.
GibbL. M. and GibbJ. R., The effects of the use of participative action groups, American Psychologist, 7: 247, 1952.
19.
DiVestaE. J., The effect of methods of presentation and examining conditions on student achievement in a comprehensive course, Journal of Applied Psychology, 38: 253–255, 1954.
20.
AndersonR. P. and KellyB. L., Student attitudes about participation in classroom groups, Journal of Educational Research, 48: 255–267, 1964.
21.
CohenS., The Drug Dilemma, 135 pp., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1969.
