A Strategic Model to Address Issues of Student Achievement

Abstract

This article describes an interactive and collaborative strategic planning process by a community college in which student retention and success became a focus of a re-accreditation endeavor. The underlying assumption of this strategic planning effort was that engaging all groups that have a stake in student retention at the beginning of the planning process would make it more likely that recommendations that came out of the planning effort would be comprehensive, and have the support of all stakeholders on the college campus. As a result of the involvement of faculty, students, academic and support staff, as well as persons from student affairs, a comprehensive approach rather than a piece-meal approach to student success was the result of the planning process. The holistic nature of the institutional changes that emanated from the planning process is linked to the collaborative and interactive model that was used in approaching the problem of student success.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ACT (2001, February), National college dropout and graduation rates, 1999. Retrieved from http://www.act.org/news.

Altbach

P. G.

Berdahl

R. O.

, & Gumport

P. J.

(1998). American higher education in the twenty-first century: Social, political and economic challenges. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Berkner

(1997, January). Access to postsecondary education for the 1992 high school graduates. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

Carroll

(1998). Freshman retention and attrition factors at a predominantly black urban community college. Journal of College Student Development, 29, 52–59.

Chenoweth

(1999). HBCU tackle the knotty problem of retention. Black Issues in Higher Education, 15(26), 38–41.

Clark

B. R.

(1980). The “cooling out” function revisited. New Directions for Community Colleges, 8(4), 15–31.

Cohen

A. M.

(2002). The American community college (4th Ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Cohen

A. M.

(1998). The shaping of American higher education: Emergence and growth of the contemporary system. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Henderson

(2002). Understanding the retention of Latino college students. Journal of College Student Development, 41(6), 575–588.

10.

Ignash

J. M.

(1997). New directions for community colleges: Implementing effective policies for remedial and developmental education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

11.

Lehman

(1998, February 23). The heart of philanthropy. Keynote address for the Council on Foundations. 12th Family Foundations Conference. Kalamazoo, MI: The Fetzer Institute.

12.

Nock

, & Shults

(2001). Hot programs at community colleges: AACC research brief. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

13.

Office of Institutional Research, Broward Community College. (1996). Student persistence and college prep instruction at BBCI (RR96–02). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Author.

14.

Office of Institutional Research, Broward Community College. (1997). Graduation rates for the past 14 years (RR97–11). Fort Lauderdale, FL: Author.

15.

Office of Institutional Research, Broward Community College. (2001). Seven-year summary of fall credit enrolment: 1994–2000. Fort Lauderdale, FL: Author.

16.

Padilla

(1999). College student retention: Focus on success. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice, 1(2), 131–145.

17.

Pascarella

E. T.

, & Terenzini

P. T.

(1991). How college affects students: Findings and insights from twenty years of research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

18.

Policy Center on the first Year of College. (2003). Second national survey of first-year academic practices. Available online at: http://www.brevard.edu/fyc/survey2002/findings.htm.

19.

Rendon

(2000). fulfilling the promise of access and opportunity: Collaborative colleges for the 21st century. Washington, DC: American Association of Community Colleges.

20.

Rossiere

(2001). College preparatory need by high school of origin for first-time-in-college students. Ft. Lauderdale, FL: Office of Institutional Research, Broward Community College.

21.

Roueche

J. E.

, & Roueche

S. D.

(1997). Between a rock and a hard place: The at-risk student in the open-door college. Washington, DC: Community College Press.

22.

Southern Association of Colleges and Schools (2003). SACS reaffirmation committee report. Retrieved from Broward Community College Web site: http://www.broward.edu/sacs/reaffirmationcommitteereport.pdf.

23.

Seidman

(1991). Faculty can make a difference in student persistence. Colleague, 21–25.

24.

Sydow

, & Sandel

(1998). Making student retention an institutional priority. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 22, 635–643.

25.

Wyckoff

S. C.

(1999). The academic advising process in higher education: History, research, and improvement. Recruitment and Retention in Higher Education, 13(1), 1–3.