Two studies addressed students' motivation and participation in an online discussion board which was part of a traditional lecture-based course. The discussion board represented an external communication resource to extend the learning activities beyond the classroom. Self-Determination Theory was used as the theoretical framework to investigate: (a) how students' participation in online discussion related to their intrinsic motivation and attitude toward the class; b) how students' intrinsic motivation changed over time; and c) what factors students noted as responsible for the changes in their motivation level. A total of 123 undergraduate students participated in online discussion as a normal part of their instructional technology class. The results showed that students' participation was related to their intrinsic motivation, but not to their computer/internet skills. Over time, students' intrinsic motivation for participating in online discussion dropped steadily. Student-reported reasons for the motivation changes are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AragonS. R.JohnsonS. D., & ShaikN. (2002). The influence of learning style preferences on student success in online versus face-to-face environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(4), 227–244.
2.
Benbunan-FichR., & HiltzS. R. (1999). Impacts of asynchronous learning networks on individual and group problem solving: A field experiment. Group Decision and Negotiation, 8, 409–426.
3.
BenfieldG. (2002). Designing and managing effective online discussions. Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development, OCSLD.
4.
CohenJ. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
5.
DeBackerT. K., & MillerR. B. (2004). Perceptions of classroom climate, student motivation, and achievement: Changes and interrelationships across an academic year. Paper presented at the Ninth International Conference on Motivation, Lisbon, Portugal.
6.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behaviors. New York: Plenum.
7.
DeciE. L., & RyanR. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.
8.
DiazD. P., & CartnalR. B. (1999). Students' learning styles in two classes. College Teaching, 47(4), 130–135.
9.
DeumerL.FontenotD.GumforyK.KallusM.LarsenJ.ShaferS., & ShawB. C.Jr. (2002). The use of online synchronous discussion groups to enhance community formation and professional identity development. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 1(2). Retrieved January 20, 2004, from http://www.ncolr.org/jiol/issues/PDF/1.2.4.pdf.
10.
HaraN.BonkC. J., & AngeliC. (2000). Content analysis of online discussion in an applied educational psychology course. Instructional Science, 28, 115–152.
11.
HortonW. (2000). Designing web-based training. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
12.
HowlandJ. L., & MooreJ. L. (2002). Student perceptions as distance learners in internet-based courses. Distance Education, 23(2), 183–195.
13.
JeongA. C. (2003). The sequential analysis of group interaction and critical thinking in online threaded discussions. The American Journal of Distance Education, 17(1), 25–43.
14.
LiuY. (2002). What does research say about the nature of computer-mediated communication: Task-oriented, social-emotion-oriented, or both?Electronic Journal of Sociology, 6(1). Retrieved January 20, 2004 from http://www.sociology.org/content/vol066.001/liu.html
15.
McDuffieA. R., & SlavitD. (2003). Utilizing online discussion to support reflection and challenge beliefs in elementary mathematics methods classrooms. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 2(4), 446–466.
16.
MurphyE. (2004). Recognising and promoting collaboration in an online asynchronous discussion. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 421–431.
17.
NeuhauserC. (2002). Learning style and effectiveness of online and face-to-face instruction. The American Journal of Distance Education, 16(2), 99–113.
18.
RonteltapF., & EurelingsA. (2002). Activity and interaction of students in an electronic learning environment for problem-based learning. Distance Education, 23(1), 11–22.
19.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
20.
RyanR. M., & DeciE. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78.
SpencerD. H., & HiltzS. R. (2003). A field study of use of synchronous chat in online courses. Paper presented at the 36th International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii.
23.
StipekD., & RyanR. (1997). Economically disadvantaged preschoolers: Ready to learn but further to go. Developmental Psychology, 33(4), 711–723.
24.
ThomasM. J. W. (2002). Student participation in online discussion: The implications of learning activities and discourse development on assessment. Paper presented at the Evaluations 2002 conference, Brisbane, Queensland.
25.
WarschauerM. (1996). Comparing face-to-face and electronic discussion in the second language classroom. CALICO Journal, 13(2), 7–26.
26.
WigfieldA., & EcclesJ. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Journal of Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
27.
YildizS., & BichelmeyerB. A. (2003). Exploding electronic forum participation and interaction by efl speakers in two web-based graduate-level courses. Distance Education, 24(2), 175–193.
28.
ZhangD., & MuA. (2003). Use of online chat in a webct-enhanced elementary Chinese language class. Paper presented at the World Conference on E-Learning in Corp., Govt., Health., & Higher Ed., Phoenix, AZ.
