This article presents an analysis of issues related to low-dose radiation, with a focus on pediatric computed tomography (CT). It references several early studies that are seldom quoted in radiation research papers, then quantifies the excess lifetime fatal cancer yield attributable to an estimated 6.5 million pediatric abdominal CT scans. The authors highlight an important policy document issued jointly by the National Cancer Institute and the Society for Pediatric Radiology—specifically, its conclusion that a small dose from CT represents “a public health concern.” Finally, the article identifies several contentious issues and proposes policy initiatives that, if implemented, could result in significant reductions of future radiogenic cancers and chronic injuries. The authors call for discussions between professional radiology societies and public interest health organizations, thereby involving all stakeholders.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
National Cancer Institute and Society for Pediatric Radiology. Radiation and Pediatric Computed Tomography: A Guide for Health Care Providers.National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, 2002.
2.
Health Physics Society. Position Statement: Radiation Risk in Perspective. Revised, August 2004. www.hps.org (January 5, 2006).
3.
Board on Radiation Effects Research Panel. A Review of the Dose Reconstruction Program of the Defense Threat Reduction Agency.National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2003.
4.
MullerH. J.Artificial transmutation of the gene. Science46:84–87, 1927.
5.
MullerH. J.Genetic damage produced by radiation. Science121:837–840, 1955.
6.
SchwartzS. I. (ed.). Atomic Audit: The Costs and Consequences of U.S. Nuclear Weapons Since 1940.Brookings Institution, Washington, DC, 1998.
7.
StewartA.WebbJ. W., and HewittD.A survey of childhood malignancies. BMJ2:1495–1508, 1958.
8.
MacMahonB.Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.28:1173–1191, 1962.
9.
MacKenzieI.Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies. Br. J. Cancer19:1–8, 1965.
10.
MyrdenJ. A., and HiltzJ. E.Breast cancer following multiple fluoroscopies during artificial pneumothorax treatment of pulmonary tuberculosis. CMAJ100:1032–1034, 1969.
11.
ModanV.RonE., and WernerA.Thyroid cancer following scalp irradiation. Radiology123:741–744, 1977.
12.
BoiceJ. D.Jr., and MonsonR. R.Breast cancer in women after repeated fluoroscopic examinations of the chest. J. Natl. Cancer Inst.59:823–832, 1977.
13.
BaverstockK. F.PapworthD., and VennartJ.Risk of radiation at low dose rates. Lancet1:430–433, 1981.
14.
HarveyE.Prenatal x-ray exposure and childhood cancer in twins. N. Engl. J. Med.312:541–545, 1985.
15.
ModanB.Increased risk of breast cancer after low-dose irradiation. Lancet1:629–631, 1989.
16.
DoodyM. M.Breast cancer mortality after diagnostic radiography: Findings from the United States Scoliosis Cohort Study. Spine25:2052–2063, 2000.
17.
GofmanJ. W., and TamplinA. R.Low dose radiation and cancer. IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.NS-17(1):1–9, 1970.
18.
GofmanJ.W.Radiation and Human Health.Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, 1981.
19.
GofmanJ. W., and O'ConnorE.X-rays: Health Effects of Common Exams.Sierra Club Books, San Francisco, 1985.
20.
GofmanJ. W.Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure.CNR Books, San Francisco, 1990.
21.
GofmanJ. W.Preventing Breast Cancer: The Story of a Major, Proven Cause of This Disease.CNR Books, San Francisco, 1995.
22.
GofmanJ. W.Radiation from Medical Procedures in the Pathogenesis of Cancer and Ischemic Heart Disease.CNR Books, San Francisco, 1999.
23.
DavisG. T., and BruwerA. J.Two book reviews: Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Radiation: BEIR V (National Research Council, 1990) and Radiation-Induced Cancer from Low-Dose Exposure (John W. Gofman, 1990). N. Engl. J. Med.324:497–498, 1991.
24.
United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation. Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation: UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, Vol. II, p. 80. U.N. Publications, New York, 2000.
25.
DollR., and WakefordR.Risk of childhood cancer from fetal irradiation. Br. J. Radiol.70:130–139, 1997.
26.
BrennerD. J.Cancer risks attributable to low doses of ionizing radiation: Assessing what we really know. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA100:13761–13766, 2003.
27.
BrennerD. J.Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.176:289–296, 2001.
28.
SlovisT. L. (ed.). Conference on the ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction. Pediatr. Radiol.32 (April), 2002.
29.
FeigalD. W.FDA Public Health Notification: Reducing Radiation Risk from Computed Tomography for Pediatric and Small Adult Patients.FDA Center for Devices and Radiological Health, Rockville, MD, November 2, 2001.
30.
LintonO. W., and MettlerF. A.Jr.National conference on dose reduction in CT, with an emphasis on pediatric patients. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol.181:321–329, 2003.
31.
SternS. H.Nationwide Evaluation of X-ray Trends (NEXT): 2000–2001 Survey of Patient Radiation Exposure from Computed Tomography Examinations in the United States.U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, MD, 2002. www.fda.gov/cdrh/ct/risks.html (February 3, 2006).
32.
MettlerF. A.Jr.CT scanning: Patterns of use and dose. J. Radiol. Prot.20:353–359, 2000.
33.
NickoloffE.Current adult and pediatric CT doses. Pediatr. Radiol.32:250–260, 2002.
34.
NickoloffE.Phone conversation with L. Ehrle, July 1, 2004.
35.
National Research Council. BEIR-V Report: Health Effects of Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation.National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 1990.
36.
International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements. The Quality Factor in Radiation Protection: ICRU Report 40.Joint Task Force of the ICRU and ICRP, Washington, DC, 1986.
37.
StraumeT.High-energy gamma rays in Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Implications for risk and weighting factor. Health Phys.69:954–956, 1995.
38.
KucerovaM.X-ray-induced chromosome aberrations in human peripheral blood lymphocytes. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.21:389–396, 1972.
39.
BrewenJ. E.Genetic hazards of ionizing radiations: Cytogenic extrapolations from mouse to man. Mutat. Res.17:245–254, 1973.
40.
EvansH. J.Radiation-induced chromosome aberrations in nuclear dockyard workers. Nature277:531–534, 1979.
41.
LloydD. C.Chromosome aberrations in human lymphocytes induced in vitro by very low doses of X rays. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.61:335–343, 1992.
42.
GalvanN.Background radiation plays a minor role in the production of chromosome translocations in a control population. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.75:819–827, 1999.
43.
MinklerJ. L.A long-term effect of radiation on chromosomes of cultured human fibroblasts. Mutat. Res.13:67–75, 1971.
44.
KadhimM. A.Transmission of chromosomal instability after plutonium alpha-particle irradiation. Nature355:738–740, 1992.
45.
MendoncaM. S.AntonionoR. J., and RedpathJ. L.Delayed heritable damage and epigenetics in radiation-induced neoplastic transformation of human hybrid cells. Radiat. Res.134:209–216, 1993.
46.
MarderB. A., and MorganW. F.Delayed chromosomal instability induced by DNA damage. Mol. Cell. Biol.13:6667–6677, 1993.
47.
HolmbergK.Clonal chromosome aberrations and genomic instability in X-irradiated human T-lymphocyte cultures. Mutat. Res.286:321–330, 1993.
48.
KadhimM. A.Alpha-particle induced chromosomal instability in human bone-marrow cells. Lancet344:987–988, 1994.
49.
KronenbergA.Radiation-induced genomic instability. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.66: 603–609, 1994.
50.
KadhimM. A.Radiation-induced genomic instability: Delayed cytogenic aberrations and apoptosis in primary human bone-marrow cells. Int. J. Radiat. Biol.67:287–293, 1995.
MothersillC., and SeymourC.Radiation-induced bystander effects: Past history and future directions. Radiat. Res.155:759–767, 2001.
53.
ZhouH.Radiation risk to low fluences of alpha particles may be greater than we thought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA98:14410–14415, 2001.
54.
HujoelP. P.Antepartum dental radiography and infant low birth. JAMA291:1987–1993, 2004.
55.
MacDormanM. F.Explaining the 2001–2002 mortality increase: Data from the linked birth/infant health data set. Natl. Vital Stat. Rep.53(12), 2005.
56.
SlovisT. L.Executive summary: Conference on the ALARA concept in pediatric CT intelligent dose reduction (18–19 Aug 2001). Pediatr. Radiol.32:221, 2002.
57.
StewartB. W., and KleihuesP. (eds.). World Cancer Report.World Health Organization, International Agency for Research on Cancer Press, Lyon, 2003.
58.
NussbaumR. H., and KohnleinW.Inconsistencies and open questions regarding low-dose health effects of ionizing radiation. Environ. Health Perspect.102:656–667, 1994.
59.
GarrettL.Betrayal of Trust: The Collapse of Global Public Health.Hyperion, New York, 2000.
60.
MorganK. Z., and PetersonK. M.The Angry Genie: One Man's Walk Through the Nuclear Age.University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, 1999.
61.
PicanoE.Informed consent and communication of risk from radiological and nuclear medicine examinations: How to escape from a communication inferno. BMJ329:849–851, 2004.
62.
EhrleL. H.Rapid response to Picano: X-ray risk is understated. BMJ, March 11, 2004 (electronic communication).
63.
National Research Council. BEIR VII: Health Risks from Exposure to Low Levels of Ionizing Radiation.National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 2005. www.nap.edu (January 10, 2006).
64.
BeralV.Mortality of employees of the United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority: 1946–1979. BMJ291:440–447, 1985.
65.
BertellR.Epidemiology in radioactive contaminated areas? In Biomedical and Psychosocial Consequences of Radiation from Man-made Radionuclides, pp. 303–324. Proceedings of International Symposium. Royal Norwegian Society of Sciences and Letters Foundation, Trondheim, Norway, 1994.
66.
BusbyC., and Scott CatoM.Death rates from leukaemia are higher than expected in areas around nuclear sites in Berkshire and Oxfordshire. BMJ315:309, 1997.
67.
BurlakovaE. B. (ed.). Consequences of the Chernobyl Catastrophe for Human Health.Centre for Russian Environmental Policy, Moscow, 1996.
68.
GardnerM. J.Results of case-control study of leukaemia and lymphoma among young people near Sellafield nuclear plant in West Cumbria. BMJ300: 423–429, 1990.
69.
SternglassE. J.Secret Fallout.McGraw Hill, New York, 1981.
70.
Schmitz-FeuerhakeI.Leukaemia near water nuclear reactor. Lancet342:1484, 1993.
71.
BandashevskyY. I.Incorporation of Cs 137 and pathology of the thyroid gland. Int. J. Radiat. Med.3:10–11, 2001.
72.
GoncharovaR. I.Remote consequences of the Chernobyl disaster: Assessment after 13 years? In Low Doses of Radiation: Are They Dangerous? ed. BurlakovaE.. NOVA Science, New York, 2000.
73.
ManganoJ.Chernobyl and hypothyroidism. Lancet347:1482–1483, 1996.
74.
BusbyC. (ed.). 2003 Recommendations of the European Committee on Radiation Risk: Health Effects of Radiation Exposure at Low Doses for Radiation Protection Purposes.Green Audit Press, Aberystwyth, UK, 2003.
75.
BramhallR.BusbyC., and DorfmanP.Committee Examining Radiation Risk from Internal Emitters: Minority Report.Sosiumi Press, Aberystwyth, UK, 2004.
76.
SimonS. L.2004 update of dosimetry for the Utah Thyroid Cohort Study. Radiat. Res.65:208–222, 2006.
