The Magical Number Five in Art Appreciation

Abstract

To describe differences in art appreciation between children of different ages, between children and adults, and between adults with different educational backgrounds, five components of aesthetic judgment were defined. These were named: “Attraction,” “Representation and realism,” “Emotional expression,” “Style and form,” and “Interpretation.” In a review of six studies with participants ranging from primary and secondary school children to various adult groups, it was investigated in which amount the five components characterized each group. For that purpose, explanations for art preferences in these studies were analyzed. The results indicate that individuals or groups can be characterized with respect to their art appreciation as showing a particular “profile” of the five aesthetic components. Also, it seems justified to distinguish one stage-like transition in aesthetic development, in early adolescence. This is seen as a transition from a chiefly semantic (content-related) to a mainly aesthetic (style-, emotion-, and interpretation-related) orientation.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Apter

M. J.

(1989). Reversal theory: Motivation, emotion and personality. London: Routledge.

Dongelmans

van Mensvoort

Oosterbosch

Theunisse

Timmerman

, & Tromp

(1995). Van Nijntje naar Picasso in vijf stadia. Unpublished research report, University of Leiden.

Erenstein

Nolting

Schilperoord

Kerklaan

Bloemendaal

van den Burg

Slagter

Ch.

, & Jonkman

(1996). De realiteit voorbij: De esthetische groei in vijf stadia. Unpublished research report, University of Leiden.

Feist

G. J.

, & Brady

T. R.

(2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77–89.

Freeman

N. H.

(1999). Young people bring with them a theory of art to the hospital experience. Arte e ospedale. Siena: Fondazione Giovanni Michelluci.

Gardner

(1981). Children's perceptions of works of art: A developmental portrait. In O'Hare

(Ed.), Psychology and the arts (pp. 123–147). Brighton: The Harvester Press.

Hargreaves

D. J.

, & Galton

(1992). Aesthetic learning: Psychological theory and educational practice. In: Reimer

& Smith

R. A.

(Eds.), The arts, education and aesthetic knowing (pp. 124–150). Ninety-first yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education (NSSE), Part II, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Housen

(1983). The eye of the beholder: Measuring aesthetic development. Unpublished dissertation. Cambridge: Harvard University.

Koopmans

(1996). Kunstwaarderingsprofiel van de kunstlener: Een onderzoek naar kunstvoorkeur, leengedrag en persoonlijkheid van de kunstlener. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Leiden.

10.

Krampen

(1996). Jacobson's model of linguistic functions and modern painting. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 14(1), 49–63.

11.

Locher

P. J.

(2004). Experimental scrutiny of the visual rightness theory of picture perception. In Frois

J. P.

Andrade

, & Marques

J. F.

(Eds.), Art and science: Proceedings of the XVIII Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 620–623). Lisbon: Calouste Gulbenkian Foundation.

12.

Meier

N. C.

(Ed.). (1939). Studies in the psychology of art III. Factors in artistic aptitude. Final summary of a ten-year study of a special ability. Psychological Monographs, 51, 5, whole no. 231.

13.

Parsons

M. J.

(1987). How we understand art: A cognitive developmental account of aesthetic experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

14.

Pruyn

(1996). Kunstperceptie door kunsthistorici: Het pentagram-model onderzocht. Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Leiden.

15.

Pruyn

(1997). Kunstperceptie door politici. Unpublished research report, University of Leiden.

16.

van Meel-Jansen

(1988). De kunst verstaan: Inleiding in de psychologie van de beeldende kunst. Assen: Van Gorcum.

17.

van Meel-Jansen

(2000). Points of view: The pentagram conception of art appreciation. In Swift

(Ed.), Broadside 4 (pp. 1–19). Birmingham: ARTicle Press.

18.

Vrij

(1997). Kunstwaardering: Waarom een (on)gelijkheid? Unpublished Master's thesis, University of Utrecht.

19.

Winner

(1982). Invented worlds: The psychology of the arts. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.