A common dilemma among physicians who treat the dying is whether pharmacological paralysis should be reversed prior to removal of mechanical ventilation. But what if a physician were to administer a neuromuscular blocker without ever ventilating the patient in the first place? While there is evidence that euthanasia does occur in the United States, few physicians have been prosecuted. Could these infrequent prosecutions reflect a conscious desire by prosecutors not to pursue such matters? In an effort to explore this question, chief prosecutors in four U.S. states were presented with a vignette based on an actual event involving the administration of Succinylcholine to a dying patient. Response rates in this study were very acceptable (76.36% overall), and results indicated that not only was the likelihood of criminal prosecution low, almost half of the prosecutors believed that a physicianadministered lethal injection may be morally justified in some circumstances even though illegal.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlpersA. (1998). Criminal act or palliative care? Prosecutions involving the care of the dying. Journal of Law, Medicine, & Ethics, 26, 308–331.
2.
BensonM., & CullenF. T. (1998). Combating corporate crime: Local prosecutors at work. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
3.
BurtR. A. (1997). The Supreme Court speaks—Not assisted suicide but a Constitutional right to palliative care. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(17), 1234–1236.
4.
ButtigiegM., & PaceN. (2004). Neuromuscular blockade during withdrawal of life support and the principle of double effect. CPD Anaesthesia, 6(2), 85–87.
5.
CaddellD. P., & NewtonR. R. (1995). Euthanasia: American attitudes toward the physician's role. Social Science and Medicine, 40, 1671–1681.
6.
CoxS. J. (1976). Prosecutorial discretion: An overview. American Criminal Law Review, 13, 383–434.
7.
DillmanD. A. (2000). Mail and Internet surveys: The tailored design method (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
8.
EmanuelE. J. (2002). Euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide: A review of the empirical data from the United States. Archives of Internal Medicine, 162, 142–152.
9.
Faber-LangendoenK. (1994). The clinical management of dying patients receiving mechanical ventilation. A survey of physicians. Chest, 106(3), 880–888.
10.
FohrS. A. (1998). The double effect of pain medication: Separating myth from reality. Journal of Palliative Medicine, 1, 315–328.
11.
FinkelN. J.HurabiellM. L., & HughesK. C. (1993). Right to die, euthanasia, and community sentiment. Law and Human Behavior, 17(5), 487–506.
12.
HawryluckL. (2002). Neuromuscular blockers—A means of palliation?Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 170–172.
13.
HooverE. (1997, December 11). Doctor won't be charged in patient death. Doctor won't be charged in patient death, p. A1.
14.
JacobyJ. E. (1980). The American prosecutor: A search for identity. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
15.
KirklandL. (1994). Neuromuscular paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5(1), 38–39.
16.
LiederbachJ.CullenF. T.SundtJ. L., & GeisG. (2001). The criminalization of physician violence: Social control in transformation. Justice Quarterly, 18(1), 141–170.
17.
LowenbergS. (2006). U.S. physician-senator Bill Frist disappoints on health. Lancet, 367, 1967–1968.
18.
MeierD.EmmonsC.WallensteinS.QuillT.MorrisonS. R., & CasselC. K. (1998). A national survey of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the United States. New England Journal of Medicine, 338(17), 1193–1201.
19.
MeiselA., & CerminaraK. L. (2004). The right to die (3rd ed.). New York: Aspen Publishers.
20.
MeiselA.JerniganJ. C., & YoungnerS. J. (1999). Prosecutors and end-of-life decision making. Archives of Internal Medicine, 159, 1089–1095.
21.
PerkinR. M., & ResnikD. B. (2002). The agony of agonal respiration: Is the last gasp necessary?Journal of Medical Ethics, 28, 164–170.
StreetK., & HendersonJ. (2001). The distinction between withdrawing life sustaining treatment under the influence of paralysing agents and euthanasia. British Medical Journal, 323, 388–391.
24.
ThomasC. W., & FitchW. A. (1976). Prosecutorial decision making. American Criminal Law Review, 13, 507–559.
25.
TruogR. D., & BurnsJ. P. (1994). To breathe or not to breathe. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 5(1), 39–41.
26.
TruogR. D.BurnsJ. P.MitchellC.JohnsonJ., & RobinsonW. (2000). Pharmacologic paralysis and withdrawal of mechanical ventilation at the end of life. New England Journal of Medicine, 342(7), 508–511.
27.
TulskyJ. A.AlpersA., & LoB. (1996). A middle ground on physician-assisted suicide. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 5, 33–43.
28.
ZieglerS. J. (2003). Prosecutors, palliative medicine, and physician-assisted death: An empirical assessment of the likelihood of prosecution stemming from opioid and non-opioid administrations. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Washington State University.
29.
ZieglerS. J. (2005). Physician-assisted suicide and criminal prosecution: Are physicians at risk?Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 33(2), 349–358.
30.
ZieglerS. J. (2006). Increasing response rates in mail surveys without increasing error: A research note. Criminal Justice Policy Review, 17(1), 22–31.
31.
ZieglerS. J., & JacksonR. A. (2004). Who's not afraid of Proposal B? An analysis of exit poll data from Michigan's vote on physician-assisted suicide. Politics and the Life Sciences, 23(1), 42–48.
ZieglerS. J., & LovrichN. P. (2003). Pain relief, prescription drugs, and prosecution: A four-state survey of chief prosecutors. Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 31(1), 75–100.
