Motivational interviewing (MI) is a brief intervention that has been shown to reduce heavy drinking among college students. Because all college studies of MI to date have included a personalized feedback report, it remains unclear which of the components is necessary to produce behavior change. This study evaluated the separate and collective effects of MI and feedback among 122 “binge” drinking college students. Participants were randomized to: 1) MI with feedback, 2) MI without feedback, 3) Mailed feedback only, 4) MI with mailed feedback, or 5) Assessment only control. At an eight-week follow-up, all groups reduced their consumption, peak BAC, consequences, and dependence symptoms. For females, there were reductions in consequences and dependence symptoms in groups that received feedback, as compared to groups that did not receive feedback. For females, there was an effect of the feedback on consequences and dependence symptoms, but was no overall effect of MI on any outcome measure.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AgostinelliG.BrownJ. M., & MillerW. R. (1995). Effects of normative feedback on consumption among heavy drinking college students. Journal of Drug Education, 25(1), 31–40.
2.
ArnettJ. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. The American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.
3.
BaerJ. S.KivlahanD. R.BlumeA. W.McKnightP., & MarlattG. A. (2001). Brief intervention for heavy-drinking college students: Four-year follow-up and natural history. American Journal of Public Health, 91(8), 1310–1316.
4.
BorsariB., & CareyK. B. (2000). Effects of a brief motivational intervention with college student drinkers. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68(4), 728–733.
5.
BurkeB. L.ArkowitzH., & DunnC. (2002). The efficacy of motivational interviewing and its adaptations: What we know so far. In MillerW. R. & RollnickS. (Eds.), Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change (2nd ed., pp. 217–250). New York: Guilford Press.
6.
CliffordP., & MaistoS. A. (2000). Subject reactivity effects and alcohol treatment outcome research. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 61, 787–793.
7.
CollinsR. L.ParksG. A., & MarlattG. A. (1985). Social determinants of alcohol consumption: The effects of social interaction and model status on the self-administration of alcohol. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 53, 189–200.
8.
CollinsS. E.CareyK. B., & SliwinskiM. J. (2002). Mailed personalized normative feedback as a brief intervention for at-risk college drinkers. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 63(5), 559–567.
9.
DavidsonR., & RaistrickD. (1986). The validity of the Short Alcohol Dependence Data (SADD) Questionnaire: A short self-report questionnaire for the assessment of alcohol dependence. British Journal of Addiction, 81(2), 217–222.
10.
Del BocaF. K.DarkesJ.GreenbaumP. E., & GoldmanM. S. (2004). Up close and personal: Temporal variability in the drinking of individual college students during their first year. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(2), 155–164.
11.
DunnC.DerooL., & RivaraF. P. (2001). The use of brief interventions adapted from motivational interviewing across behavioral domains: A systematic review. Addiction, 96(12), 1725–1742.
12.
FrommeK., & CorbinW. (2004). Prevention of heavy drinking and associated negative consequences among mandated and voluntary college students. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72, 1038–1049.
13.
JohnstonL. D.O'MalleyP. M., & BachmanJ. G. (2000). National survey results on drug use from the monitoring the future study, 1975–1999. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
14.
KivlahanD. R.MarlattG. A.FrommeK.CoppelD. B., & WilliamsE. (1990). Secondary prevention with college drinkers: Evaluation of an alcohol skills training program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58(6), 805–810.
15.
LarimerM. E., & CronceJ. M. (2002). Identification, prevention and treatment: A review of individual-focused strategies to reduce problematic alcohol consumption by college students. Journal of Studies on Alcohol. Supplement, 14, 148–163.
16.
LarimerM. E.TurnerA. P.AndersonB. K.FaderJ. S.KilmerJ. R.PalmerR. S. (2001). Evaluating a brief alcohol intervention with fraternities. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 62(3), 370–380.
17.
LewisM. A., & NeighborsC. (2004). Gender-specific misperceptions of college student drinking norms. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 18(4), 334–339.
18.
MarlattG. A.BaerJ. S.KivlahanD. R.DimeffL. A.LarimerM. E.QuigleyL. A. (1998). Screening and brief intervention for high-risk college student drinkers: Results from a 2-year follow-up assessment. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(4), 604–615.
19.
McMurranM.HollinC. R., & BowenA. (1990). Consistency of alcohol self-report measures in a male young offender population. British Journal of Addiction, 85(2), 205–208.
20.
MillerW. R.BenefieldR. G., & ToniganJ. S. (1993). Enhancing motivation for change in problem drinking: A controlled comparison of two therapist styles. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(3), 455–461.
21.
MillerW. R., & RollnickS. (2002). Motivational interviewing : Preparing people for change (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
22.
MillerW. R.ZwebenA.DiClementeC. C., & RychtarikR. G. (1995). Motivational enhancement therapy manual (Project MATCH Monograph No.2). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
23.
MontiP. M.ColbyS. M.BarnettN. P.SpiritoA.RohsenowD. J.MyersM. (1999). Brief intervention for harm reduction with alcohol-positive older adolescents in a hospital emergency department. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67(6), 989–994.
24.
MurphyJ. G.BensonT. A.VuchinichR. E.DeskinsM. M.EakinD.FloodA. M. (2004). A comparison of personalized feedback for college student drinkers delivered with and without a motivational interview. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 65(2), 200–203.
25.
MurphyJ. G.DuchnickJ. J.VuchinichR. E.DavisonJ. W.KargR. S.OlsonA. M. (2001). Relative efficacy of a brief motivational intervention for college student drinkers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15(4), 373–379.
26.
National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. (2002). A call to action: Changing the culture of drinking at U.S. colleges. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
27.
NealD. J., & CareyK. B. (2004). Developing discrepancy within self-regulation theory: Use of personalized normative feedback and personal strivings with heavy drinking college students. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 281–297.
28.
NeighborsC.LarimerM. E., & LewisM. A. (2004). Targeting misperceptions of descriptive drinking norms: Efficacy of a computer-delivered personalized normative feedback intervention. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 72(3), 434–447.
29.
RaistrickD.DunbarG., & DavidsonR. (1983). Development of a questionnaire to measure alcohol dependence. British Journal of Addiction, 78(1), 89–95.
30.
ThombsD. L., & HamiltonM. J. (2002). Effects of a social norm feedback campaign on the drinking norms and behavior of Division I student-athletes. Journal of Drug Education, 32(3), 227–244.
31.
WaltersS. T. (2000). In praise of feedback: An effective intervention for college students who are heavy drinkers. Journal of American College Health, 48(5), 235–238.
32.
WaltersS. T., & BennettM. E. (2000). Addressing drinking among college students: A review of the empirical literature. Alcoholism Treatment Quarterly, 18(1), 61–77.
33.
WaltersS. T.BennettM. E., & MillerJ. H. (2000). Reducing alcohol use in college students: A controlled trial of two brief interventions. Journal of Drug Education, 30(3), 361–372.
34.
WaltersS. T., & NeighborsC. (2005). Feedback interventions for college alcohol misuse: What, why and for whom?Addictive Behaviors, 30(6), 1168–1182.
35.
WaltersS. T., & WoodallW. G. (2003). Mailed feedback reduces consumption among moderate drinkers who are employed. Prevention Science, 4(4), 287–294.
36.
WechslerH.DowdallG. W.MaennerG.Gledhill-HoytJ., & LeeH. (1998). Changes in binge drinking and related problems among American college students between 1993 and 1997: Results of the Harvard School of Public Health College Alcohol Study. Journal of American College Health, 47(2), 57–68.
37.
WhiteH. R., & LabouvieE. W. (1989). Towards the assessment of adolescent problem drinking. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 50(1), 30–37.
