Whose Ideas?: The Technical Writer's Expertise in Inventio

Abstract

Compelling arguments from researchers studying the rhetoric of science have convinced both scientists and humanists that technical writing involves invention, or discovery of the available means of argument. If we agree that inventio is crucial to technical writing, however, we encounter a problem: namely, that the rhetor engaged in invention as part of a technical writing process does not necessarily have expertise in the subject matter of the composition. What, then, is the expertise that the technical writer contributes to the invention process? Working from the notion that knowledge is an activity rather than a commodity [1], I argue that a technical writer's expertise in invention lies in an ability to adapt rhetorical heuristics to situations of interdisciplinary collaboration. This focus expands our understanding of how invention works when the goal of communication is producing knowledge across disciplinary boundaries, rather than winning an argument with persuasive techniques.¹

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Gage

J. T.

, An Adequate Epistemology for Composition: Classical and Modem Perspectives, in Landmark Essays on Rhetorical Invention, Young

and Liu

(eds.), Hermagoras Press, California, pp. 203–219, 1994.

Halloran

S. M.

and Whitburn

M. D.

, Ciceronian Rhetoric and the Rise of Science: The Plain Style Reconsidered, in The Rhetorical Tradition and Modern Writing, Murphy

J. J.

(ed.), The Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp. 58–72, 1982.

Tebeaux

, The High-Tech Workplace: Implications for Technical Communication Instruction, in Technical Writing: Theory and Practice, Fearing

B. E.

and Sparrow

W. K.

(eds.), The Modern Language Association of America, New York, pp. 136–144, 1989.

Miller

, Invention in Technical and Scientific Discourse: A Prospective Survey, in Research in Technical Communication, Moran

and Journet

(eds.), Greenwood Press, Connecticut, pp. 117–162, 1985.

Schleifer

, Disciplinarity and Collaboration in the Sciences and Humanities, College English, 59, pp. 438–452, 1997.

Kaufer

and Young

, Writing in the Content Areas: Some Theoretical Complexities, in Theory and Practice in the Teaching of Writing: Rethinking the Discipline, Odell

(ed.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 71–103, 1993.

Debs

M. B.

, Recent Research on Collaborative Writing in Industry, Technical Communication, 38, pp. 476–484, 1991.

Jorn

, A Selected Annotated Bibliography on Collaboration in Technical Writing, Technical Communication Quarterly, 2: 1, pp. 105–115, 1993.

Bereiter

and Scardamalia

, The Psychology of Written Composition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1987.

10.

Ehninger

, On Systems of Rhetoric, in Professing the New Rhetorics: A Sourcebook, Enos

and Brown

S. C.

(eds.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 327–339, 1994.

11.

Bitzer

L. F.

, The Rhetorical Situation, Philosophy and Rhetoric, 1, pp. 1–14, 1968.

12.

Whitburn

M. D.

, The Ideal Orator and Literary Critic as Technical Communicators: An Emerging Revolution in English Departments, in Essays on Classical Rhetoric and Modern Discourse, Connors

R. J.

Ede

L. S.

, and Lunsford

A. A.

(eds.), Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, pp. 226–247, 1984.

13.

Morris

J. H.

Neuwirth

C. M.

Regli

S. H.

Chandhok

, and Wenger

G. C.

, Interface Issues in Computer Support for Asynchronous Communication, ACM Computing Surveys, special issue (in press).

14.

Neuwirth

C. M.

Morris

J. H.

Regli

S. H.

Chandhok

, and Wenger

G. C.

, Envisioning Communication: Task-Tailorable Representations of Communication in Asynchronous Work, in Proceedings of the Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work, Association for Computing Machinery Press, Seattle, November 14–18, 1998.

15.

Boyarski

Neuwirth

Forlizzi

, and Regli

S. H.

, A Study of Fonts Designed for Screen Display, in Proceedings of the CHI '98 Conference on Computer-Human Interaction, Association for Computing Machinery Press, Los Angeles, April 18–23, 1988 [Conference papers—not published].

16.

Regli

S. H.

, The Rhetoric of Information Technology: Virtual Work Room Archives and the Role of Persuasion, The Penn State Conference on Rhetoric and Composition, State College, Pennsylvania, July 6–9, 1997.

17.

Regli

S. H.

, Argument in Hypertext: Accessible Sources, The Thirteenth Computers and Writing Conference, Honolulu, Hawaii, June 4–9, 1997.