Reasons and Reasoning for Leaving College among the Academic Elite: Case Study Findings and Implications

Abstract

Attrition from any institution, especially in large numbers, may generate concern among that institution's officials. But high attrition from a selective institution is especially unexpected: students and schools invest significant resources to ensure an appropriate match. This study examines the reasons and reasoning behind students' decisions to leave college, based on a case study of attrition at a major selective American university. The analysis is based on in-depth interviews in order to uncover the qualitative details about how attrition occurs, and the ways in which it is experienced, in the lives of students. The results of this study indicate that intervention may most profitably lie in the reasoning, rather than the reasons alone, that underlie students decisions to leave. Students' reasons and reasoning turn out to have generic properties, which can likely inform retention policy at many other types of institutions.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Bandura

(1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman and Company.

Magolda

Baxter M. B.

(1992). Knowing and reasoning in college: Gender-related patterns in students' intellectual development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Braxton

J. M.

Brier

E. M.

, & Hossler

(1988). The influence of student problems on student withdrawal decisions: An autopsy on ‘autopsy studies’. Research in Higher Education, 28, 241–253.

Braxton

J. M.

Sullivan

A. V. S.

, & Johnson

R. M.

Jr. (1997). Appraising Tinto's theory of college student departure. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 107–164). New York: Agathon.

Glaser

B. G.

, & Strauss

A. L.

(1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.

Goode

W. J.

(1978). The celebration of heroes: Prestige as a control system. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Hossler

Schmit

, & Vesper

(1999). Going to college: How social, economic, and educational factors influence the decisions students make. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Kohlberg

(1963). Moral development and identification. In Stevenson

H. W.

(Ed.), Child psychology 62nd yearbook, national society for the study of education, part 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Morse

(1994). Designing funded qualitative research. In Denzin

N. K.

& Lincoln

Y. S.

(Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 220–235). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

10.

Pascarella

E. T.

, & Chapman

D. W.

(1983). A multi-dimensional path analytic validation of Tinto's model of college withdrawal. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 87–102.

11.

Pascarella

E. T.

, & Terenzini

P. T.

(1980). Predicting persistence and voluntary dropout decisions from a theoretical model. Journal of Higher Education, 51, 60–75.

12.

Perry

W. G.

Jr. (1968). Forms of ethical and intellectual development in the college years: A scheme. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

13.

Stage

F. K.

, & Hossler

(2000). Where is the student? Linking student behaviors, college choice, and college persistence. In Braxton

J. M.

(Ed.), Reworking the student departure puzzle (pp. 170–195). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.

14.

Tinto

(1975). Dropout from higher education: A theoretical synthesis of recent research. Review of Educational Research, 45, 89–125.

15.

Tinto

(1986). Theories of student departure revisited. In Smart

J. C.

(Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research 2 (pp. 359–384). New York: Agathon.

16.

Tinto

(1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

17.

U.S. News and World Report. (1998). Directory of colleges and universities: America's best colleges.