The Online University: Who are its Students and How are They Unique?

Abstract

This study examined relationships between student personality and choice of traditional on-campus or online college classes. The personality profiles of online and on-campus students were determined using the Fifth Edition of the 16 Personality Factor (16PF) questionnaire. Students taking online classes scored higher than on-campus students on scales of abstract reasoning and apprehension, and lower on the scale for social boldness. Online students were also more comfortable with computers than on-campus students, and were more likely to be nontraditional students (26 and older). These data show that there are differences in personality, age, and computer experience between online and on-campus students and help to elucidate the characteristics of students selecting the online venue for college classes and/or curricula which are useful to instructors teaching on the Internet as well as companies working to architect these learning environments.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abel

M. H.

Brown

L. K.

(1998). Validity of the 16PF Reasoning Ability Scale. Psychological Reports, 83:3, Pt 1, 904–906.

Barrett

Lally

(1999). Gender differences in an on-line learning environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 15:1, 48–60.

Brosnan

(1998). The impact of psychological gender, gender-related perceptions, significant others, and the introducer of technology upon computer anxiety in students. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18:1, 63–78.

Burger

(1986). Computer assisted instruction: Learning style and academic achievement. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12:1, 21–22.

Busato

V. V.

Prins

F. J.

Elshout

J. J.

Hamaker

(1998). The relation between learning styles, the Big Five personality traits and achievement motivation in higher education. Personality & Individual Differences, 26:1, 129–140.

Butler

J. F.

(1987). Personality characteristics of subjects high and low in apprehension about communication. Perceptual & Motor Skills, 62:3, 895–898.

Cattell

R. B.

Cattell

J. P.

(1996). Personality structure and the new fifth edition of the 16PF. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 55:6, 926–937.

Chen

Gully

S. M.

Whiteman

J. A.

Kilcullen

R. N.

(2000). Examination of relationships among trait-like individual differences, state-like individual differences, and learning performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85:6, 835–847.

Dewar

Whittington

(2000). Online learners and their learning strategies. Journal of Educational and Computing Research, 23:4, 385–403.

10.

Ermakova

(1991). Predicating poor achievement in adolescent computer skills formation. School Psychology International, 12, 189–192.

11.

Leitsch

P. K.

Van Hove

S. D.

(2000). Extraverted intuitives: A profile of adult learners. Psychology—A Quarterly Journal of Human Behavior, 35:3–4, 44–49.

12.

MacGregor

Shapiro

J. Z.

(1988). Effects of a computer-augmented learning environment on math achievement for students with differing cognitive style. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4:4, 453–465.

13.

Matthews

Wells

(1988). Relationships between anxiety, self-consciousness, and cognitive failure. Cognition & Emotion, 2:2, 123–132.

14.

Nath

L. M.

(1987). Role of personality and interest for students' success in medical course. Psychological Research Journal, 11:2, 54–63.

15.

Pillay

(1998). An investigation of the effect of individual cognitive preferences on learning through computer-based instruction. Educational Psychology, 18:2, 171–182.

16.

Pocius

(1991). Personality factors in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 7, 103–135.

17.

Radford

Holdstock

(1995). Gender differences in higher education aims between computing and psychology students. Research in Science and Technological Education, 13:2, 163–176.

18.

Rocheleau

(1995). Computer use by school-age children: Trends, patterns, and predictors. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 12:1, 1–17.

19.

Russell

Karol

(1994). Administrator's Manual 16PF (5th ed.). Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing, Inc.