How has technical communication changed over the past twenty-five years in the United Kingdom and elsewhere in Europe? As a task, it has not changed at all; as a professional occupation, it has evolved slowly; as a procedure, it has changed dramatically.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
KirkmanJohn, Acceptable Usage: Do You Share the Majority Opinions?Communicator, 5:3, 1995, ISSN 0308–6925.
2.
KirkmanJohn, Full Marks: Advice on Punctuation for Scientific and Technical Writing, Ramsbury Books, 1993, ISBN 0-9521762-0-3.
3.
KirkmanJohn, Good Style: Writing for Science and Technology, E&FN Spon, 1992, ISBN 0-419-17190-8.
4.
KirkmanJohn, Which English Should We Teach for International Technical Communication, Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 22:1, 1992, ISSN 0047–2816.
5.
TurkChristopher and KirkmanJohn, Effective Writing, E&FN Spon, 1989, ISBN 0-419-14660-1.
6.
KirkmanJohn, How “Friendly” Is Your Writing for Readers Around the World? in Text, ConText and HyperText, BarrettE. (ed.), MIT Press, 1988.
