The challenge of sustainable development—the ultimate goal of precaution—demands that we shift our focus away from individual environmental problems and toward long-term integration of environmental, social, and economic policy. It also elevates protection of ecosystem processes and biodiversity to the status of significant policy goals. In this article, the author argues for a new use of the precautionary principle, as a means to assess broad policy decisions to target indirect or systemic rather than direct threats to sustainability. He draws on a case study of two Australian policies: the National Strategy for Ecologically Sustainable Development (ESD), and the National Competition Policy (NCP). While the proposals are ambitious and may not be achievable in the near future, nonetheless, it is in the nature of institutional and policy systems that it is difficult to predict when opportunities for policy change will arise. It is crucial to develop and articulate strategies now, to be promoted during brief windows of opportunity for policy change.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
United Nations, Agenda 21: The Programme of Action from Rio, UN, New York, 1992.
2.
HamiltonC. and ThrosbyD. (eds.), Ecologically Sustainable Development: Evaluating a Policy Experiment, Academy of the Social Sciences, Canberra, 1998.
3.
WalkerK. and CrowleyK. (eds.), Australian Environmental Policy 2: Studies in Decline and Devolution, University of New South Wales Press, Sydney, 1999.
4.
GullettW., The Precautionary Principle in Australia: Policy, Law and Potential Precautionary EIAs. Risk: Health, Safety and Environment, 11, pp. 93–124, 2000.
5.
SteinP., Are Decision Makers Too Cautious with the Precautionary Principle?Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 17, pp. 3–23, 2000.
6.
BoydenS., Western Civilization in Biological Perspective: Patterns in Biohistory, Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1987.
7.
DoversS., A Framework for Scaling and Framing Policy Problems in Sustainability, Ecological Economics, 12, pp. 93–106, 1995.
8.
DoversS., Sustainability: Demands on Policy, Journal of Public Policy, 16, pp. 303–318, 1997.
9.
PorterA. L. and FittipaldiJ. J. (eds.), Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, 1998.
10.
PartidarioM. and ClarkR. (eds.), Perspectives on Strategic Environmental Assessment, CRC Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, 2000.
11.
BondR.CurranJ.KirkpatrickC.LeeN., and FrancisP., Integrated Impact Assessment for Sustainable Development: A Case Study Approach, World Development, 29, pp. 1011–1024, 2001.
12.
MarsdenS. and DoversS., Strategic Environmental Assessment in Australasia, Federation Press, Sydney, 2002.
13.
GoodlandR., Strategic Environmental Assessment, in Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, PorterA. L. and FittipaldiJ. J. (eds.), Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 87–94, 1998.
14.
BuckleyR., Strategic Environmental Assessment, in Environmental Methods Review: Retooling Impact Assessment for the New Century, PorterA. L. and FittipaldiJ. J. (eds.), Army Environmental Policy Institute, Atlanta, Georgia, pp. 77–86, 1998.
15.
GoodinR. E., Institutions and Their Design, in The Theory of Institutional Design, GoodinR. E. (ed.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
16.
DoversS. and MobbsC., An Alluring Prospect? Ecology, and the Requirements of Adaptive Management, in Frontiers in Ecology, KlompN. and LuntI. (eds.), Elsevier, London, 1997.
17.
DoversS., Institutions for Sustainability, Tela paper 7, Australian Conservation Foundation, Melbourne (acfonline.org.au).
18.
SmithsonM., Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms. Springer-Verlag, New York, 1989.
MayP., Policy Learning and Policy Failure, Journal of Public Policy, 14, pp. 331–354, 1992.
21.
LeeK. N., Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Island Press, Washington D.C., 1993.
22.
StewartD. and McCollG., The Resource Assessment Commission: An inside Assessment, Australian Journal of Environmental Management, 1, pp. 12–23, 1994.
23.
HamiltonC., The Resource Assessment Commission: Lessons in the Venality of Modern Politics, in Processes and Institutions for Resource and Environmental Management: Australian Experiences, DoversS. and Wild RiverS. (eds.), Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, 2001.
24.
CranorC. F., Asymmetric Information, the Precautionary Principle, and Burdens of Proof, in Protecting Public Health and the Environment: Implementing the Precautionary Principle, RaffenspergerC. and TicknerJ. (eds.), Island Press, Washington, D.C., 1999.
25.
CastlesF., The Dynamics of Policy Change: What Happened in the English-Speaking Nations in the 1980s, European Journal of Political Research, 18, pp. 491–513, 1990.
26.
BellS., Globalisation, Neoliberalism and the Transformation of the Australian State, Australian Journal of Political Science, 32, pp. 345–367, 1997.
27.
OrchardL., Managerialism, Economic Rationalism and Public Sector Reform in Australia: Connections, Divergences, Alternatives, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 57, pp. 19–32, 1998.
28.
CaterM. (ed.), Public Interest in National Competition Policy, Public Sector Research Centre, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 1998.
29.
House of Representatives Standing Committee on Financial Institutions and Public Administration, Cultivating Competition: Inquiry into Aspects of the National Competition Policy Package, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra, 1997.
30.
DoversS. and GullettW., Policy Choice for Sustainability: Marketisation, Law and Institutions, in Environmental Justice and Market Mechanisms, BosselmanK. and RichardsonB. (eds.), Kluwer Law International, London, 1999.
31.
Productivity Commission, Microeconomic Reform and the Environment, Productivity Commission, Melbourne, 2000.
32.
DoversS., Adaptive Policy, Institutions and Management: Challenges for Lawyers and Others, Griffith Law Review, 8, pp. 374–393, 1999.
33.
Productivity Commission, Implementation of Ecologically Sustainable Development by Commonwealth Departments and Agencies, AusInfo, Canberra, 1999.
34.
YenckenD. and WilkinsonD., Resetting the Compass: Australia's Journey Toward Sustainability, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, 2000.
35.
BanksG., Competition and the Public Interest, paper presented to the National Competition Council workshop The Public Interest Test Under National Competition Policy, Melbourne, July 12, 2001.
36.
HamiltonC. and DennissR., Impact of Microeconomic Reform on Greenhouse Gas Emissions from the Electricity Sector, in Microeconomic Reform and the Environment, Productivity Commission, Melbourne, 2000.
