Introducing Expanding Hypertext Based on Working Memory Capacity and the Feeling of Disorientation: Tailored Communication through Effective Hypertext Design
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online April, 2004
Introducing Expanding Hypertext Based on Working Memory Capacity and the Feeling of Disorientation: Tailored Communication through Effective Hypertext Design
The purpose of this study was to investigate how text formats affect readers' recall and feeling of disorientation based on their working memory capacities and past experience with hypertext. A post-test only experiment was conducted. A new hybrid hypertext, expanding hypertext, was proposed and tested with 201 college students. Among the participants who were low in hypertext experience, those who read the expanding hypertext reported the least disorientation whereas those who read the paged hypertext reported the most disorientation. Of the participants with more hypertext experience, those who read the paged hypertext reported the least disorientation while those who read the scrolling text reported the most disorientation. Of the participants who were low in working memory capacity, those who read the scrolling text produced higher recall scores than those who read the paged hypertext. The text formats appeared to influence how much time the participants spent reading the texts and in turn affected the participants' recall scores.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BaddeleyA. D. (1986). Working memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BaddeleyA. D.LogieR.Nimmo-SmithI.BreretonN. (1985). Components of fluent reading. Journal of Memory and Language, 24, 119–131.
3.
BatraS.BishuR. R.DonohueB. (1993). Effect of hypertext topology on navigation performance. Advances in Human Factors and Ergonomics, 19, 175–180.
4.
BuddD.WhitneyP.TurleyK. J. (1995). Individual differences in working memory strategies for reading expository text. Memory and Cognition, 23(6), 735–748.
5.
CarpenterP. A.JustM. A. (1989). The role of working memory in language comprehension. In KlahrD.KotovskyK. (Eds.), Complex information processing: The impact of Herbert A. Simon (pp. 31–68). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
6.
ChenC. (2000). Individual differences in a spatial-semantic virtual environment. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 529–542.
7.
ChenC.CzerwinskiM.MacredieR. (2000). Individual differences in virtual environments—Striking the balance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51(6), 499–507.
8.
ConklinE. J. (1987). Hypertext: An introduction and survey, IEEE Computer, 2, 17–41.
9.
DanemanM.CarpenterP. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466.
10.
Dee-LucasD.LarkinJ. H. (1995). Learning from electronic texts: Effects of interactive overviews for information access. Cognition and Instruction, 13(3), 431–468.
11.
DiasP.GomesM. J.CorreiaA. P. (1999). Disorientation in hypermedia environments: Mechanisms to support navigation. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(2), 93–117.
12.
DillonA. (1996). Myths, misconceptions, and an alternative perspective on information usage and the electronic medium. In RouetJ.LevonenJ. J.DillonA.SpiroJ. (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 25–42). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
13.
EdwardsD.HardmanL. (1989). Lost in hyperspace: Cognitive mapping and navigation in a hypertext environment. In McAlleseR. (Ed.), Hypertext: Theory into practice, Oxford: Intellect Books.
14.
EngelbartD. (1973). The augmented knowledge workshop. National Computer Conference and Exposition. Proceedings AFIPS Conference, June 4–8, 1973, New York. Montvale, NJ: AFIPS Press.
15.
FitzgeraldG. E. (1998). Expert and novice performance in a hypermedia learning environment for classroom observation skills: The impact of prior teaching experience. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 19(2), 115–131.
16.
GordonS.GustavelJ.MooreJ.HankeyJ. (1988). The effect of hypertext on reader knowledge representation. Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors Society, 32, 296–300.
17.
GrayS. H. (1990). Using protocol analysis and drawing to study mental model construction during hypertext navigation. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 2(4), 359–377.
18.
HammondN. (1989). Hypermedia and learning: Who guides whom? In Conference, ICCAL '89 (pp. 167–181). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19.
HammondN.AllinsonL. (1989). Extending hypertext for learning: An investigation of access and guidance tools. In SutcliffeA.MacauleyL. (Eds.), People and computers V (pp. 293–304). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
20.
HellerR. S. (1990). The role of hypermedia in education: A look at the research issues. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 22, 421–441.
21.
JacobsonT.FusaniD. (1992). Computer, system, and subject knowledge in novice searching of a full-text, multifile database. Library and Information Science Research, 14, 97–106.
JonassenD. H.GrabingerR. S. (1990). Problems and issues in designing hypertext/hypermedia for learning. In JonassenD. H.MandlH. (Eds.), Designing Hypermedia for Learning (pp. 3–25). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
24.
JonassenD. H.WangS. (1990). Acquiring structural knowledge from semantically structured hypertext. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for the Development of Computer-Based Instructional Systems, San Diego, CA.
25.
KhanK.LocatisC. (1998). Searching through cyberspace: The effects of link display and link density on information retrieval from hypertext on the World Wide Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(2), 176–182.
26.
KimH.HirtleS. C. (1995). Spatial metaphors and disorientation in hypertext browsing. Behaviour and Information Technology, 14, 239–250.
27.
KintschW.Van DijkT. A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychology Review, 85, 363–394.
28.
LeeM. J. (1998). The effects of hypertext on readers' recall based on gender. Paper presented at the 81st annual convention of the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication, Baltimore.
29.
LeeM. J. (2001). Effective tailored-communication in learning from hypertext: Introducing expanding hypertext based on individuals' sensation-seeking and working memory capacity (Doctoral dissertation, University of Florida, 2001). Dissertation Abstracts International, 62, 10-A.
30.
LeeM. J.FergusonM. A.TedderM. C. (1999). The effects of three different computer texts on readers' recall (based on working memory, risk-taking tendencies, and hypertext experience). Paper presented at the National Communication Association, Chicago.
31.
LeeM. J.TedderM. C. (2002). Effective tailored communication in learning from hypertext: Introducing expanding hypertext based on individuals' working memory capacity. Paper presented at the International Communication Association, Seoul, South Korea.
32.
Lee-SammonsW.WhitneyP. (1991). Reading perspectives and memory for text: An individual differences analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 17, 1074–1081.
33.
LinC.DavidsonG. (1996). Effect of linking structure and cognitive style on students' performance and attitude in a computer-based hypertext environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 15(4), 317–329.
34.
LiuM. (1992). Hypermedia-assisted instruction and second language learning: A semantic-network-based approach. West Virginia, U.S. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED349954).
35.
LorchR. F.Jr. (1989). Text-signaling devices and their effects on reading and memory processes. Educational Psychology Review, 1, 209–234.
36.
McAlleseR. (1991). The acquisition and representations of domain specific knowledge using notecards. In McAlleseR. (Ed.), Hypermedia courseware structures of communication and intelligent help (pp. 11–18). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
37.
McDonaldS.StevensonR. I. (1996). Disorientation in hypertext: The effects of three text structures on navigation performance. Applied Ergonomics, 27, 61–68.
38.
McDonaldS.StevensonR. J. (1999). Spatial versus conceptual maps as learning tools in hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(1), 43–64.
39.
McKnightC. (1996). What makes a good hypertext? In van OosterndorpH.de MulS. (Eds.), Cognitive aspects of electronic text processing (pp. 213–238). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
40.
RouetJ.LevonenJ. J.DillonA.SpiroR. J. (1996). An introduction to hypertext and cognition. In RouetJ.LevonenJ. J.DillonA.SpiroJ. (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 3–8). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41.
SchroederE. E. (1994). Navigating through hypertext: Navigational technique, individual differences, and learning. Paper presented at the 1994 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Nashville, TN.
42.
ShapiroA. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1–35.
43.
ShneidermanB. (1992). Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley.
44.
SmithP. A.WilsonJ. R. (1993). Navigation in hypertext through virtual environments. Applied Ergonomics, 24, 271–278.
45.
SpiroR. J.JehngJ. C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the nonlinear and multidimensional traversal of compels subject matter. In NixD.SpiroR. J. (Eds.), Cognition, education, and multimedia: Exploring ideas in high technology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
46.
TrippS. D.RobyW. (1990). Orientation and disorientation in a hypertext lexicon. Journal of Computer Based Instruction, 17(4), 120–124.
47.
UnzD. C.HesseF. W. (1999). The use of hypertext for learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 20(3), 279–295.
48.
WengerM. J. (1996). Comprehension and retention of nonlinear text: Considerations of working memory and material-appropriate processing. American Journal of Psychology, 109(1), 93–130.
49.
YuillN.OakhillJ.ParkinA. (1989). Working memory, comprehension ability and the resolution of text anomaly. British Journal of Psychology, 80, 351–361.
