The traditional instruction of technical report writing leans heavily on the conventions of English grammar and on principles advocated by grammarians, journalists, and literature scholars. The effect has been so strong—particularly in North America—that the word “technical” in technical writer, technical writing, and technical reports has literally become almost meaningless. This article discusses a few important differences between technical and nontechnical writing. It also explains some shortcomings of the traditional instruction and suggests methods of improvement.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
“Practical Communication Courses for Engineering Students,”JordanM., Engineering Journal, June 1972.
2.
“Documenting Canada's Secondary Industry,”PilfoldD.JordanM., Engineering Journal, June 1972.
3.
“Performance Specifying,”JordanM., Canadian Consulting Engineer, May 1974.
4.
“Elements of Efficient Communication,”JordanM., PROC 21st ITCC, Houston, Texas, U.S.A., May 1973.
5.
“Diseases of Technical Writing,”DouglasG., J. Tech. Writing & Commun.Vol. 4(1), 1974.
6.
“Notes Toward a Definition of Technical Writing,”DandridgeE., J. Tech. Writing & Commun., Vol. 3(4), 1973.
7.
Studies in English Adverbial Usage, GreenbaumS., University of Miami Press, page 80.
8.
“Besides Moreover However and But—Conjunctions: Order out of Confusion,”JordanM., J. Tech. Writing & Commun., Vol. 4(2), 1974.
9.
“Next Then Although More Too—Conjunctions in Action,”JordanM., J. Tech. Writing & Commun., Vol. 4(3), 1974.
10.
“CSI Format—Master List of Specification Section Titles,”CSI Manual of Practice MP-2A, The Construction Specification Institute, 1717 Mass. Ave., Washington, D.C. 20036, U.S.A., September 1972.
11.
Logic—Theoretical and Applied, BrodyB., Prentice-Hall, 1973.
