Four of the five issues normally involved in an argument of policy can be persuasively argued on the basis of facts. However, the fourth issue, that of fairness, might better be argued by following the organizational plan of an appellate court decision. The Supreme Court decision in Teminello vs. the United States is offered as an example. The practicality of this plan is illustrated with a student paper.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
SawyerT. M., “Commentary: Argument,”Journal of Technical Writing and Communication, 17, pp. 253–263, 1987.
2.
MorrisCohen, Reason and Nature, Harcourt Brace and Company, New York, 1931.
3.
SawyerThomas M.Explanation, JTWC, 15: 2, 1985.
4.
SawyerThomas M., Explanation, A Writing Teacher's Glimpse of the Engineer's World, Teaching Technical Writing: The Training of Teachers of Technical Writing, Anthology No. 4, ed. HarrisJohn S., The Association of Teachers of Technical Writing, 1984.
5.
SawyerThomas M., Explanation, Understanding the Rhetoric of Scientific Writing, Technical and Business Communication in Two-Year Programs, ed. SparrowKeats W. and PickettNell Ann (Urbana, Illinois: National Council of Teachers of English), 1983, pp. 22–32.
6.
SawyerThomas M., Explanation, Rhetoric in an Age of Science and Technology, A Guide for Writing Better Technical Papers, ed. HarkinsC. and PlungD. (New York: IEEE Press), 1982, pp. 42–50.
7.
SawyerThomas M.Explanation, Grading Technical and Non-Technical Communication: Some Proposed Research, JTWC, 10: 2, 1980.
8.
SawyerThomas M.Explanation, Defining and Presenting Data, The ABCA Bulletin, 43, No. 2, 1980, pp. 7–11.
