Interpretation of research investigating the content of dreams within the context of sleep studies is complicated by memory-related factors. The present study offers a controlled experiment using wakeful participants to test two main hypotheses that have implications for sleep studies: 1) that the bizarre content of dream reports is more memorable than the common content and 2) that dream structure influences dream recall. Regarding the latter hypothesis, the memorability of three different types of dream reports (Discontinuous, Improbable Combinations, and Improbable Identities) was tested. The results indicated that bizarre content was recalled better than common content across all dream types. Although the three dream types did not differ in terms of correct recall, there was more misplacement in the recall of bizarre than common target content for Discontinuous dream reports only. Implications of the results for the interpretation of sleep studies investigating dream content is discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WundtW., Grundzüge der physiologischen Psychologie, [Basics of Physiological Psychology]Leipzig.
2.
TitchenerE. B., Minor Studies from the Psychological Laboraory of Cornell University: VI. Taste dreams, American Journal of Psychology, 6, pp. 505–509, 1895.
3.
CalkinsM. W., Minor Studies from the Psychological Laboratory of Clark University: Statistics of Dreams, American Journal of Psychology, 5, pp. 311–343, 1893.
4.
NelsonJ., A Study of Dreams, American Journal of Psychology, 1, pp. 367–401, 1888.
5.
AntrobusJ. S., Dreaming: Cortical Activation and Perceptual Thresholds, Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, pp. 193–212, 1986.
6.
DomhoffG. W., New Directions in the Study of Dream Content Using the Hall and Van de Castle Coding System, Dreaming: Journal of the Association for the Study of Dreams, 9, pp. 115–137, June 1999.
7.
DomhoffG. W., The Scientific Study of Dreams: Neural Networks, Cognitive Development, and Content Analysis, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C.
8.
PadghamC. A., Colours Experienced in Dreams, British Journal of Psychology, 66, pp. 25–28, 1975.
9.
CipolliC.BolzaniR.CornoldiC.De BeniR.FagioliI., Bizarreness Effect in Dream Recall, Sleep, 16, pp. 163–170, 1993.
10.
ReinselR.AntrobusJ.WollmanM., Bizarreness in Dreams and Waking Fantasy, in The Neuropsychology of Sleep and Dreaming, AntrobusJ. S.BertiniM. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1992.
11.
HallC. S.Van de Castle, The Content Analysis of Dreams, Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1966.
12.
AntrobusJ. S., REM and NREM Sleep Reports: Comparison of Word Frequencies by Cognitive Classes, Psychophysiology, 20, pp. 562–568, 1983.
13.
WeingartnerH.AdefrisW.EichJ. E.MurphyD. L., Encoding-Imagery Specificity in Alcohol State-Dependent Learning, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 2, pp. 83–87, 1976.
14.
EichE., Content, Memory, and Integrated Item/Context Imagery, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 11, pp. 764–770, 1985.
15.
McDanielM. A.AndersonD. C.EinsteinG. O.O'HalloranC. M., Modulation of Environmental Reinstatement Effects through Encoding Strategies, American Journal of Psychology, 102, pp. 523–548, 1989.
16.
KellyD. D., Sleep and Dreaming, in Principles of Neural Science (2nd Edition), KandelE. R.SchwartzJ. H. (eds.), Elsevier, New York, pp. 648–658, 1985.
17.
ComerR. J., Abnormal Psychology, Freeman, New York.
18.
CornoldiC.CavedonA.De BeniR.Pra BaldiA., The Influence of the Nature of Material and of Mental Operations on the Occurrence of the Bizarreness Effect, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 40A, pp. 73–85, 1988.
19.
Pra BaldiA.De BeniR.CornoldiC.CavedonA., Some Conditions for the Occurrence of the Bizarreness Effect in Free Recall, British Journal of Psychology, 76, pp. 427–436, 1985.
20.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O., Bizarreness as an Effective Memory Aide: The Importance of Distinctiveness, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 12, pp. 54–65, 1986.
21.
DavidsonD.LarsonS. L.LuoZ.BurdenM. J., Interruption and Bizarreness Effects in the Recall of Script-Based Text, Memory, 8, pp. 217–234, 2000.
22.
DavidsonD.MalmstromT.BurdenM. J.LuoZ., Younger and Older Adults' Recall of Typical and Atypical Actions from Script-Based Text: Evidence for Interruption and Bizarre-Imagery Effects, Experimental Aging Research, 26, pp. 409–430, 2000.
23.
MarshallP. H.NauK.ChandlerC. K., A Functional Analysis of Common and Bizarre Visual Mediators, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, pp. 375–377, 1980.
24.
WorthenJ. B.LovelandJ. M., Disruptive Effects of Bizarreness in Free and Cued Recall of Self-Performed and Other-Performed Acts: The Costs of Item-Specific Processing, in Advances in Psychology Research (Vol. 24), ShohovS. P. (ed.), Nova Science Publishers, Hauppauge, New York, pp. 3–17, 2003.
25.
WorthenJ. B.RoarkB., Free Recall Accuracy for Common and Bizarre Verbal Information, American Journal of Psychology, 115, pp. 377–394, 2002.
26.
WorthenJ. B.WoodV. V., Memory Discrimination for Self-Performed and Imagined Acts: Bizarreness Effects in False Recognition, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 53A, pp. 49–67, 2001.
27.
WorthenJ. B.WoodV. V., A Disruptive Effect of Bizarreness on Memory for Relational and Contextual Details of Self-Performed and Other-Performed Acts, American Journal of Psychology, 114, pp. 535–546, 2001.
28.
WorthenJ. B., Resolution of Discrepant Memory Strengths: An Explanation of the Effects of Bizarreness on Memory, in Distinctiveness and Memory, HuntR. R.WorthenJ. B. (eds.), Oxford University Press, New York, in press.
29.
FoulkesD., The Psychology of Sleep, Scribner's, New York, 1966.
30.
WorthenJ. B., Resiliency of Bizarreness Effects under Varying Conditions of Verbal and Imaginal Elaboration and List Composition, Journal of Mental Imagery, 21, pp. 167–194, 1997.
31.
McDanielM. A.EinsteinG. O., Bizarre Imagery: Mnemonic Benefits and Theoretical Implications, in Mental Images in Human Cognition, LogieR. H.DenisM. (eds.), Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 183–192, 1991.
32.
AndersonD. C.BuyerL. S., Is Imagery a Functional Component of the “Bizarre Imagery” Phenomenon?American Journal of Psychology, 107, pp. 207–222, 1994.
33.
WeirD.RichmanC. L., Subject-Generated Bizarreness: Imagery or Semantic Processing, American Journal of Psychology, 109, pp. 173–185, 1996.
34.
McDanielM. A.DeLoshE. L.MerrittP. S., Order Information and Retrieval Distinctiveness: Recall of Common versus Bizarre Material, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 26, pp. 1045–1056, 2000.
