Since the 19th century, workers have organized in trade unions and parties to strengthen their efforts at improving workplace health and safety, job conditions, working hours, wages, job contracts, and social security. Cooperation between workers and their organizations and professionals has been instrumental in improving regulation and legislation affecting workers' health. The authors give examples of participatory research in occupational health in Denmark and Finland. The social context of workplace health promotion, particularly the role of unions and workers' safety representatives, is described in an international feasibility study. Health promotion is rife with fundamental political, socioeconomic, philosophical, ethical, gender- and ethnicity-related, psychological, and biological problems. Analysis of power and context is crucial, focusing on political systems nationally, regionally, and globally. The authors advocate defending and supporting workers and their trade unions and strengthening their influence on workplace health promotion. In the face of rapid capitalist globalization, unions represent a barricade in defense of workers' health and safety. Health promoters and related professionals are encouraged to support trade unions in their efforts to promote health for workers and other less privileged groups.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BerkmanL. F., and KawachiI.Social Epidemiology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
2.
EllingR. H.The Struggle for Workers' Health. Baywood, Amityville, N.Y., 1986.
3.
Malerrapporten, Århus [The Painter Report, Aarhus], 1971, and Maler-rapport, København [The Painter Report, Copenhagen], 1972.
4.
JohanssonM., and OlsenJ., Helbredsforhold hos lakarbejdere i Snedker- & Tømrer-forbundets Århusafdeling [Health conditions of acid-curing enamel workers in the Aarhus branch of the Carpenters' and Woodworkers' Union]. Ugeskrift Laeger137: 916–918, 1975.
5.
Arlien-SøborgP.Kronisk Toxisk Encefalopati hos bygningsmalere [Chronic Toxic Encephalopathy in Building Painters (summary and tables in English)]. Dissertation, Copenhagen, 1983.
6.
ChristiansenJ. M.Opløsningsmidler i malerfaget [Organic Solvents in House-painting Work: Health Damage among House Painters (English summary)]. Research report. Copenhagen, 1983.
7.
Errebo-KnudsenE. O., and OlsenF.Organiske opløsningsmidler og præsenil demens (malersyndromet) [Organic Solvents and Pre-senile Dementia (Painter Syndrome)]. Joint representation of the oil industry. Copenhagen, 1984.
8.
Arbejdsmiljøgruppen, Rapport nr 2: Arbejdsmiljøundersøgelsen [The Working Environment Group, Report No. 2: The Working Environment Study], p. 28. Copenhagen, 1972.
9.
The Research Council of LO.Fagbevægelsen og forskningen [The Labor Movement and Research]. Copenhagen, 1975.
10.
LevyB. S., and WegmanD. H. (eds.). Occupational Health, Ed. 4, pp. 801–803. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000.
11.
SilversteinM., and MirerF. E.Labor unions and occupational health. In Occupational Health, Ed. 4, edited by LevyB. S. and WegmanD., p. 715. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, 2000.
12.
KorpiW.Den demokratiska klasskampen [The Democratic Class Struggle]. Tidens förlag, Stockholm, 1981.
13.
KorpiW.The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions, and Politics in Sweden. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London, 1978.
14.
AxelssonJ. R. C.Quality and Ergonomics—Towards Successful Integration. Ph.D. dissertation No. 616, Linkoping University, Sweden, 2000.
15.
HolmanC. D., Association of the health-promoting workplace with trade unionism and other industrial factors. Am. J. Health Promotion12: 325–334, 1998.
16.
OchsnerM., and GreenbergM., Factors which support effective worker participation in health and safety: A survey of New Jersey industrial hygienists and safety engineers. J. Public Health Policy19: 350–366, 1998.
17.
BakerE. A.IsraelB. A., and SchurmanS. J., A participatory approach to worksite health promotion. J. Ambulatory Care Manage. 17: 68–81, 1994.
18.
LippinT. M., Empowerment-based health and safety training: Evidence of workplace change from four industrial sectors. Am. J. Ind. Med.38: 697–706, 2000.
19.
McQuistonT. H., Empowerment evaluation of workers' safety and health education programs. Am. J. Ind. Med.38: 584–597, 2000.
20.
CassouB., and PissarroB., Workers' participation and occupational health: The French experience. Int. J. Health Serv.18: 139–152, 1988.
21.
FisherK. J., Strengthening health promotion in Australian workplaces. Aust. Health Rev.20: 31–42, 1997.
22.
BienerL., Recruitment of worksites to a health promotion research trial: Implications for generalizability. J. Occup. Med.36: 631–636, 1994.
23.
HuntM. K., Results of employee involvement in planning and implementing the Treatwell 5-a-day work-site study. Health Educ. Behav.27: 223–231, 2000.
24.
HardenA., A systematic review of the effectiveness of health promotion interventions in the workplace. Occup. Med. (Lond.)49: 540–548, 1999.
25.
WaltersD., Trade unions and the effectiveness of workers' representation in health and safety in Britain. Int. J. Health Serv.26: 625–641, 1996.
26.
RestK. M., Worker participation in occupational health programs: Establishing a central role. AAOHN J.44: 221–225, 1996.
27.
SassR.A message to the labor movement: Stop and think!Int. J. Health Serv.26: 595–609, 1996.
28.
SorensenG., Labor positions on worksite tobacco control policies: A review of arbitration cases. J. Public Health Policy18: 433–452, 1997.
29.
SorensenG., Local labor unions' position on worksite tobacco control. Am. J. Public Health90: 618–620, 2000.
30.
WalkerC., NAFTA and occupational health: A Canadian perspective. J. Public Health Policy18: 325–333, 1997.
31.
Lemus-RuizB. E., The local impact of globalization: Worker and health and safety in Mexico's sugar industry. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Health. 5: 56–60, 1999.
32.
OechslerW. A., Workplace and workforce 2000+—The future of our work environment. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health. 73(Suppl.), S28–S32, 2000.
33.
KaslS. V., and JonesB. A.The impact of job loss and retirement on health. In Social Epidemiology, edited by BerkmanL. F. and KawachiI., p. 131. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
34.
NavarroV., Are pro-welfare state and full-employment policies possible in the era of globalization?Int. J. Health Serv.30: 231–251, 2000.
35.
ApgarM., IV. The alternative workplace: Changing where and how people work. Harvard Business Rev.7: 121, 1998.
36.
NavarroV.Development and quality of life: A critique of Amartya Sen's Development as Freedom. Int. J. Health Serv.30: 661–674, 2000.
37.
SorensenG., Implications of the results of community intervention trials. Annu. Rev. Public Health19: 379–416, 1998.
38.
SorensenG., Double jeopardy: Workplace hazards and behavioral risks for craftspersons and laborers. Am. J. Health Promotion10: 355–363, 1996.
39.
SorensenG., Worker participation in an integrated health promotion/health protection program: Results from the WellWorks project. Health Educ. Q.23: 191–203, 1996.
40.
SorensenG.StoddardA., and MaCarioE., Social support and readiness to make dietary changes. Health Educ. Behav.25: 586–598, 1998.
41.
SorensenG., Worksite and family education for dietary change: The Treatwell 5-a-day program. Health Educ. Res.13: 577–591, 1998.
42.
KurtzJ. R.RobinsT. G., and SchorkM. A., An evaluation of peer and professional trainers in a union-based occupational health and safety training program. J. Occup. Environ. Med.39: 661–671, 1997.
43.
StokolsD.PelletierK. R., and FieldingJ. E., The ecology of work and health: Research and policy directions for the promotion of employee health. Health Educ. Q.23: 137–158, 1996.
44.
BarakM. E., The inclusive workplace: An ecosystems approach to diversity management. Soc. Work. 45: 339–353, 2000.
45.
DugdillL., Developing a holistic understanding of workplace health: The case of bank workers. Ergonomics43: 1738–1749, 2000.
46.
HeymannS. J.Health and social policy. In Social Epidemiology, edited by BerkmanL. F. and KawachiI., pp. 375–378. Oxford University Press, New York, 2000.
