A new political economy is shaping the lives of present and future generations of older people. The key change has been the move from the mass institutions that defined growing old in the period from 1945 through the late 1970s to the more individualized structures—privatized pensions, privatized health and social care—that increasingly inform the current period. The authors examine the role of international governmental organizations in promoting this trend, with examples drawn from the work of the World Bank, World Trade Organization, and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, and the relationship between international governmental organizations and the state. The article concludes with an assessment of the changes to citizenship that accompany globalization and the implications for political organization among older people themselves.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
PetersonP.How will America pay for the retirement of the baby-boom generation? In The Generational Equity Debate, edited by WilliamsonJ. B.Watts-RoyD. M., and KingsonE., pp. 41–57. Columbia University Press, New York, 1999.
2.
World Bank. Averting the Old Age Crisis.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1994.
3.
WalkerA. (ed.). The New Generational Contract.UCL Press, London, 1996.
4.
BengstonV., and AchenbaumV. W. (eds.). The Changing Contract across Generations.Aldine de Gruyter, New York, 1993.
5.
PhillipsonC.The sociology of retirement. In Ageing and Society, edited by BondJ.ColemanP., and PeaceS., pp. 180–200. Sage, London, 1993.
6.
GouldnerA.The Coming Crisis of Western Sociology.Heinemann, London, 1971.
7.
EstesC.The Aging Enterprise.Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1979.
8.
TitmussR.Essays on the Welfare State.Allen and Unwin, London, 1993.
9.
Esping-AndersenG.After the Golden Age: The Future of the Welfare State in the New Global Order. Occasional Paper No. 7. United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, 1994.
10.
LoweR.The Welfare State in Britain since 1945.Macmillan, London, 1993.
11.
PhillipsonC.Reconstructing Old Age.Sage, London, 1998.
KagarlitskyB.The challenge for the left: Reclaiming the state. In Socialist Register 1999: Global Capitalism Versus Democracy, edited by PanitchL. and LeysC., pp. 294–313. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1999.
27.
AlberJ., and StandingG.Social dumping, catch-up or convergence. J. Eur. Soc. Policy10(2): 99–119, 2001.
28.
LeonD., and WaltiG.Poverty, Inequality, and Health.Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2000.
29.
DeaconB.Globalisation and Social Policy: The Threat to Equitable Welfare. Occasional Paper No. 5. Globalisation and Social Policy Programme, United Nations Research Institute for Social Development, Geneva, 2000.
30.
SassoonA. S.Globalisation, hegemony and passive revolution. New Polit. Econ.6(1): 5–13, 2001.
31.
NavarroV.Are pro-welfare state and full-employment policies possible in the era of globalisation?Int. J. Health Serv.30(2): 231–251, 2000.
32.
PhillipsonC.Globalisation and Intergenerational Ties: New Solidarities and Relationships. Paper presented to the 17th World Congress of the International Association of Gerontology, Vancouver, 2001.
33.
EstesC. L.The Reagan legacy: Privatization, the welfare state and aging in the 1990s. In State, Labour Markets, and the Future of Old Age Policy, edited by MylesJ. and QuadagnoJ.. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, 1991.
34.
HoltzmanR.A World Bank Perspective on Pension Reform. Paper prepared for the joint ILO-OECD Workshop on the Development and Reform of Pension Schemes, Paris, December 1997.
35.
International Labor Organization. Press release, Geneva, April 28, 2000.
BarlowM., and ClarkeT.Global Showdown.Stoddart, Ont., 2001.
38.
PollockA., and PriceD.Rewriting the regulations: How the World Trade Organisation could accelerate privatization in healthcare systems. Lancet356: 1995–2000, 2000.
39.
PriceD.PollockA. M., and ShaoulJ.How the World Trade Organisation is shaping domestic policy. Lancet354: 1889–1892, 1999.
40.
EstesC. L.The new political economy of aging: Introduction and critique. In Critical Perspectives on Aging: The Political and Moral Economy of Growing Old, edited by MinklerM. and EstesC. L., pp. 19–36. Baywood, Amityville, N.Y., 1991.
41.
EstesC.HarringtonC., and PellowD.The medical-industrial complex and the aging enterprise. In Social Policy and Aging, edited by EstesC., pp. 163–185. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001.
42.
EstesC.The medicalization and commodification of aging and the privatization and rationalization of old age policy. In Social Policy and Aging, edited by EstesC., pp. 45–49. Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 2001.
43.
TarabusiC. C., and VickeryG.Globalization in the pharmaceutical industry, Parts I and II. Int. J. Health Serv.28: 67–105, 281–303, 1998.
44.
CarrasquilloO.Going bare: Trends in health insurance coverage, 1989–1996. Am. J. Public Health89: 36–42, 1999.
45.
AndrewsC.Profit Fever: The Drive to Corporatize Health Care and How to Stop It.Common Courage Press, Monroe, Me., 1995.
46.
PollockA.Private sector lured by £30 bn public gold rush. Observer, July 8, 2001.
47.
HicksP.The policy challenge of aging populations. OECD Observer212, 1998.
48.
VanstonN.The economic impact of ageing. OECD Observer212, 1998.
49.
Financial Times. Global Custody: The Ticking of the Pensions Time Bomb. June 7, 2001. www.FT.com/globalarchive.
50.
SassoonA. S.Equality and difference: The emergence of a new concept of citizenship. In Socialism and Democracy, edited by McLellanD. and SayersS., pp. 87–105. Macmillan, Basingstoke, U.K., 1991.
51.
CollinsP. H.Black Feminist Thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment.Unwin-Hyman, Boston, 1990.
52.
TwineF.Citizenship and Social Rights: The Interdependence of Self and Society.Sage, Thousand Oaks, Calif., 1994.
53.
EstesC. L.From gender to the political economy of ageing. Eur. J. Soc. Quality2(1): 28–46, 2001.
54.
RubinG.The traffic in women. In Toward an Anthropology of Women, edited by ReiterR., pp. 157–210. Monthly Review Press, New York, 1975.
