Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Verbal responses have frequently been used to measure aesthetic experience. They usually take the form of semantic judgments regarding specific aspects or dimensions of certain stimuli. The use of this kind of technique has produced a great amount of knowledge, but its combination with objective procedures can increase the validity and reliability of measurement. In this study, we set out to assess whether memory traces can serve as an objective control element for subjective aesthetic judgments. We analyzed the relation between aesthetic judgment and recognition of High Art and Popular Art visual stimuli by participants with and without formal art education. Results show that participants tended to give higher pleasantness and beauty ratings to those stimuli that have left a strong memory trace. Lower scores were awarded to stimuli they did not recognize well. However, originality and interest ratings did not follow the same trend. This disparity is discussed in relation to the dimensionality of aesthetic experience and the influence of formal art education on subjective measures of aesthetic experience.

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Axelsson

(2004). Semantic differentials of aesthetic appreciation of photographs. In Frois

J. P.

Andrade

, & Marques

J. F.

(Eds.), Art and science. Proceedings of the XVIII Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 240–245). Lisboa: Jorge Fernandes.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Berlyne

D. E.

(1974). Concluding observations. In Berlyne

D. E.

(Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation (pp. 181–226). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

Cela-Conde

C. J.

Marty

Maestú

Ortiz

Munar

Fernández

Roca

Rosselló

, & Quesney

(2004). Activation of the prefrontal cortex in the human visual aesthetic perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 101, 6321–6325.

Cela-Conde

C. J.

Marty

Munar

Nadal

, & Burges

(2002). The “style scheme” grounds perception of paintings. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 91–100.

Choynowski

(1967). Dimensions of painting. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 25, 128.

Dumaurier

González

, & Molnar

(1979). Formes, couleurs et sons. In Francès

(Ed.), Psychologie de l'art et de l'esthètique (pp. 33–64). Paris: PUF.

Eysenck

H. J.

(1940). The “general factor” in aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 31, 94–102.

Feist

G. J.

, & Brady

T. R.

(2004). Openness to experience, nonconformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 2, 77–89.

10.

Furnham

, & Walker

(2001). The influence of personality traits, previous experience of art, and demographic variables on artistic preference. Personality and Individual Differences, 31, 997–1017.

11.

Hare

F. G.

(1974). Artistic training and responses to visual and auditory patterns varying in uncertainty. In Berlyne

D. E.

(Ed.), Studies in the new experimental aesthetics: Steps toward an objective psychology of aesthetic appreciation (pp. 159–168). Washington, DC: Hemisphere Publishing Corporation.

12.

Hartley

E. L.

, & Schwartz

(1966). Self-consistency, value strength and aesthetic judgments. Psychological Reports, 19, 367–370.

13.

Hekkert

, & van Wieringen

P. C. W.

(1996). Beauty in the eye of the expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389–407.

14.

Belver

M. H. Hernández

(1989). Psicología del arte y criterio estético. Salamanca: Amarú Ediciones.

15.

Marty

(2002). Formación de esquemas en el reconocimiento de estímulos estéticos. Psicothema, 13, 623–629.

16.

Marty

Cela-Conde

C. J.

Munar

Rosselló

Roca

, & Escudero

J. T.

(2003). Dimensión factorial de la experiencia estética. Psicothema, 15, 478–483.

17.

Marty

Munar

, & Nadal

(2005). Familiaridad y Evaluación de Estímulos Estéticos en Función de la Educación Artística. Psicothema, 17, 338–343.

18.

Osgood

C. E.

Suci

G. J.

, & Tannebaum

P. H.

(1957). The measurement of meaning. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

19.

Winston

A. S.

, & Cupchik

G. C.

(1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1–14.

The Search for Objective Measures of Aesthetic Judgment: The Case of Memory Traces

Abstract

Get full access to this article

References