In this technological age, sight must not be lost in recognizing individual differences in applying technology to the instructional process. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between achievement of field-dependent and field-independent students using microcomputer instruction. T-test was calculated on mean posttest scores to analyze the difference between the groups. There was a significant difference at the 0.5 level in testing the null hypothesis of no difference between the groups in this study.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThurstonT. G. and JeffreyT. E., Closure Flexibility (Concealed Figures Form A), Human Resources Center, The University of Chicago, 1980.
2.
PembertonC. L., A Study of Speed and Flexibility of Closure Factors, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Psychology, University of Chicago, 1981.
3.
ClearyJ. B. and LacombeJ. M., English Style Skill-Builders, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 1980.
4.
DunnR., Teaching in a Purple Fog: What Don't We Know About Learning Style, NASSP Bulletin, 65, p. 336, 1981.
