This meta-analysis compared the academic achievement of students in grades six through twelve who received either traditional instruction or traditional instruction supplemented with computer-assisted instruction (CAI) across eight curricular areas. From the forty-two conclusions, an overall mean effect size of 0.209 was calculated, indicating that, on average, students receiving traditional instruction supplemented with CAI attained higher academic achievement than did 58.2 percent of those receiving only traditional instruction. The comparative effectiveness of CAI may be seen in the following descending order mean effect sizes: science, 0.639; reading, 0.262; music, 0.230; special education, 0.214; social studies, 0.205; math, 0.179; vocational education, −0.080; and English, −0.420.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Carnegie Task Force on Teaching as a Profession, A Nation Prepared: Teachers for the 21st Century, Carnegie Forum on Education and the Economy, New York, 1986.
2.
WilsonB. and HarriotR., Formal Subunits within American Public Schools: The Structure, Power, and Consequences, Research for Better Schools, Inc., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 1990.
3.
ReigeluthC. and GarfinkleR., Envisioning a New System of Education, Educational Technology, 22: 11, pp. 17–22, 1992.
4.
CaissyG., Microcomputers and the Classroom Teacher, Phi Delta Kappa, Bloomington, Indiana, 1987.
5.
KozmaR., Will Media Influence Learning? Reframing the Debate, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42: 2, pp. 5–17, 1994.
6.
ClementsD., Effects of Logo and CAI Environments on Cognition and Creativity, Journal of Educational Psychology, 78: 4, pp. 309–318, 1986.
7.
Bangert-DrownsR. L.KulickC., and KulickJ., Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools, Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 12: 3, pp. 59–60, 1985.
8.
WestbrookK. and KerrS., Funding Educational Technology: Patterns, Plans, and Models, Technology and the Future of Schooling: National Society for the Study of Education, 95: 2, pp. 49–72, 1996.
9.
SchwartzE., Finally, an at for Computers in Class?Business Week, 3239, pp. 158–160, 1991.
10.
KayA., Computers, Networks, and Education, Scientific American, 265: 3, p. 392, March 1991.
11.
KhaliliA. and ShashaaniL., The Effectiveness of Computer Applications: A Meta-Analysis, Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27: 1, p. 4861, 1994.
12.
KulickJ. A.KulickC. C., and Bangert-DrownsR. L., Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Elementary Schools, Computers in Human Behavior, 1, pp. 59–74, 1985.
13.
ClarkR., Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media, Review of Educational Research, 53: 4, pp. 445–459, 1983.
14.
ClarkR., Evidence for Confounding in Computer-Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta-Analyses, Educational Communications and Technology Journal, 33: 4, pp. 249–262, 1985.
15.
ClarkR., When Researchers Swim Upstream: Reflections on an Unpopular Argument about Learning from Media, Educational Technology, 31: 2, pp. 34–40, 1991.
16.
ClarkR., Media Will Never Influence Learning, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42: 2, pp. 21–29, 1994.
17.
GlassG.McGawB., and SmithM. L., Meta-Analysis in Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1981.
18.
RosenthalR., Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research, Sage, Beverly Hills, California, 1991.
19.
GallM. D.BorgW. R., and GallJ. P., Educational Research: An Introduction, Longman, White Plains, New York, 1996.
20.
SlavinR. E., Best-Evidence Synthesis: An Alternative to Meta-Analytic and Traditional Reviews, Educational Researcher, 15: 9, pp. 5–11, 1986.
21.
WolfF., Meta-Analysis: Quantitative Methods for Research Synthesis, Sage, Newbury Park/London, 1986.
22.
KachiganS., Multivariate Statistical Analysis, Radius Press, New York, 1991.
23.
GravetterF. and WallnauL., Essentials of Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences, West Publishing Co., St. Paul, Minnesota, 1995.
24.
CohenJ., Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Science, Academic Press, New York, 1977.
25.
BaileyT., The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction in Improving Mathematics Performance of Low Achieving Ninth-Grade Students, doctoral dissertation, The College of William and Mary, Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 11-A, 1991.
26.
BassG.RiesR., and SharpeW., Teaching Basic Skills through Microcomputer Instruction, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2: 2, pp. 207–219, 1986.
27.
BattistaM. T. and ClementsD. H., The Effects of Logo and CAI Problem-Solving Abilities and Mathematics Achievement, Computers and Human Behavior, 2, pp. 183–292, 1986.
28.
BirkenholtzR., Using Microcomputers in Education: Assessment of Three Teaching Strategies, Journal of Agricultural Education, 30: 1, pp. 45–52, 1989.
29.
CarnesE.LindbeckJ., and GriffinC., Effects of Group Size and Advance Organizers on Learning Parameters when Using Microcomputer Tutorials in Kinematics, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24: 9, pp. 781–789, 1987.
30.
ChristieN. and SabresD., Using Microcomputers to Implement Mastery Learning with High-Risk and Minority Adolescents, paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, March 1989.
31.
DavidsonR., The Effectiveness of Computer-Assisted Instruction of Chapter I Students in Secondary Schools (CAI), doctoral dissertation, The University of Tennessee, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 02-A, 1985.
32.
DunnS., Effects of Experience in Computer Programming on the Cognitive Level of Secondary School Students, doctoral dissertation, Auburn University, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 10-A, 1985.
33.
DurninR., Computer-Based Education: A Study of Student Interactions and Achievement in Small Group and Individual Settings, doctoral dissertation, Clarement Graduate School, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 12-A, 1985.
34.
ElliottE., The Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction upon the Basic Skill Proficiencies of Secondary Vocational Education Students, doctoral dissertation, The University of Michigan, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 11-A, 1985.
35.
FerrellB., Evaluating the Impact of CAI on Mathematics Learning: Computer Immersion Project, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2: 3, pp. 327–336, 1986.
36.
HortonS. and LovittT., A Comparison of Two Methods of Administering Group Reading Inventories to Diverse Learners, Remedial and Special Education, 15: 6, pp. 378–390, 1994.
37.
HounshellP. and HillS., The Microcomputer and Achievement and Attitudes in High School Biology, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 26: 6, pp. 543–549, 1989.
38.
HunterM. and ChenA., A Microcomputer-Networked Information System for Daily Academic Activity by Low Achieving Students, Journal of Special Education, 11: 4, pp. 178–188, 1992.
39.
KingR., The Effects of Computer-Assisted Music Instruction on Achievement of Seventh-Grade Students, doctoral dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Dissertation Abstracts International, 49, 09-A, 1988.
40.
KleinJ. and SalisburyD., A Comparison of a Microcomputer Progressive State Drill and Flashcards for Learning Paired Associates, paper presented at the annual convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, February 1987.
41.
LandryS., A Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Based and Non-Computer-Based Revision Comments on the Writing of Low-Motivated Ninth Grade Students, doctoral dissertation, The University of Connecticut, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 11-A, 1987.
42.
LewisE. L.StemJ. L., and LinnM. C., The Effect of Computer Simulations on Introductory Thermodynamics Understanding, Educational Technology, 1, pp. 45–58, 1993.
43.
ManuelS., The Relationship between Supplemental Computer-Assisted Mathematics Instruction and Students Achievement, doctoral dissertation, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 1643A, 1987.
44.
MartyJ., Selected Effects of a Computer Game on Achievement, Attitude, and Graphing Ability in Secondary School Algebra, doctoral dissertation, Oregon State University, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 01-A, 1985.
45.
MasonM., A Longitudinal Study of the Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on Mathematics Achievement of the Learning Disabled and Educable Mentally Retarded, doctoral dissertation, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 2791A, 1984.
46.
McCaskeyM., Assessing the Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction, Journal of Studies in Technical Careers, 11: 2, pp. 119–130, 1989.
47.
RussinI., A Comparison of the Effect of Teacher-Directed Instruction (and Textbook Use) and Interactive Computer Software Instruction on the Development of Touch-Keyboarding Skills in Two Sixth-Grade Classes, unpublished master's thesis, Kean College of New Jersey, 1995.
48.
St. PierreK., The Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction and Traditional Instruction on Ninth-Grade English Composition and Academic Self-Concept, doctoral dissertation, Miami University, Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 08-A, 1992.
49.
WohlgehagenK., A Comparison of the Attitude and Achievement in Mathematics of Algebra I Students using Computer-Based Instruction and Traditional Instructional Methods, doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Dissertation Abstracts International, 53, 12-A, 1992.
50.
WoodJ., An Investigation of the Effects of Tutorial and Tool Applications of Computer-Based Education on Achievement and Attitude in Secondary Mathematics, doctoral dissertation, Purdue University, Dissertation Abstracts International, 52, 06-A, 1991.
51.
YalcinalpS.GebanO., and OzkanI., Effectiveness of Using Computer-Assisted Supplementary Instruction for Teaching the Mole Concept, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32: 10, pp. 1083–1095, 1995.
52.
TallmadgeG., The Joint Dissemination Review Panel Ideabook, National Institute of Education and the U.S. Office of Education, Washington, D.C., 1977.
53.
RobylerM., Measuring the Impact of Computers in Instruction: A Non-Technical Review of Research for Educators, Association for Educational Data Systems, Washington, D.C., 1985.
54.
ChristmannE. P.LuckingR. A., and BadgettJ. L., A Meta-Analytic Comparison among the Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Students in Urban, Suburban, and Rural Educational Settings, Computers in the Schools, in press.
55.
RyanA. W., Meta-Analysis of Achievement Effects of Microcomputer Applications in Elementary Schools, Education Administration Quarterly, 27: 2, pp. 161–184, 1991.
