When the U.S. Surgeon General suggested looking at the experience of countries that have officially or de facto decriminalized drugs, the administration's reaction was unequivocal: under no circumstances would the decriminalization of drugs be considered. This reaction prevails despite the admission by almost everyone that the so-called “war on drugs” is not merely a failure but a disaster. Had the Surgeon General's suggestion been followed the results would show that decriminalization—judging from the experience of other nations and states within the United States that have decriminalized marijuana—would have few negative consequences and many positive ones, not the least of which would be a lessening of crimes associated with the prohibition of drugs. In the United States the effect might also be to reduce the hidden racist war that takes place nightly in the ghettoes of the nation's underclass.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
ThompsonT.Mandatory terms: Routinely evaded but still popular. Washington Post, September 24, 1991, p. A21.
2.
Uniform Crime Reports. Crime in the United States. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1992.
3.
MaguireK.PastoreA.FlanaganT.Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics, pp. 623, 636. U.S. Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., 1992.
4.
U.S. Department of Justice. An Analysis of Non-violent Drug Offenders with Minimal Criminal Histories, pp. 2–3. Washington, D.C., 1994.
5.
AustinJ.IrwinJ.Who Goes to Prison?The National Council on Crime and Delinquency, San Francisco, 1989.
6.
GrapendaalM.LeuwE.NelenH.Drugs and crime in an accommodating social context: The situation in Amsterdam. Contemp. Drug Probl. 19: 303–326, Summer 1992.
7.
WinjgaartG.The Dutch approach: Normalization of drug problems. J. Drug Issues20: 667–678, Fall 1990.
8.
VlietH.Separation of drug markets and the normalization of drug problems in The Netherlands: An example for other countries?J. Drug Issues20: 463–471, Summer 1990.
9.
Ministry of Welfare, Health and Cultural Affairs and Ministry of Justice, The Netherlands. The Drug Policy in The Netherlands. December 1992.
10.
The Drug Policy Foundation. The Drug Policy Newsletter. Washington, D.C., 1993.
11.
GalliherJ. F.Illegal drugs: Where we stand and what we can do. In Drugs, Law and the State, edited by TraverH. H.GaylordM. S., pp. 153–165. Hong Kong, 1992.
12.
DiChiaraA.GalliherJ.Dissonance and contradictions in the origins of marijuana decriminalization. Law Society Rev. 28(1), 1994.
13.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ.Marijuana decriminalization: The impact on youth, 1975–1980. Monitoring the Future, Occasional Paper No. 13, p. 18. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1981.
14.
ChamblissW.On the Take: From Petty Crooks to Presidents, revised edition. Bloomington, Ind., 1988.
15.
ChamblissW.Presidential Address, Society for the Study of Social Problems, Miami, August 1993.
16.
DoobA.The United States Sentencing Commission Guidelines: If You Don't Know Where You Are Going, You Might Not Get There. Paper presented at the Colston International Sentencing Symposium, University of Bristol, April 1993.
17.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ.Monitoring the Future, Occasional Paper No. 19. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1991.
18.
MaurerM.Young Black Men and the Criminal Justice System: A Growing National Problem, p. 3. The Sentencing Project, Washington, D.C., 1990.
19.
WeinerT.Anti-drug unit of C.I.A. sent ton of cocaine to U.S. in 1990. New York Times, November 20, 1993, p. A1.
20.
McCoyA.The Politics of Heroin in Southeast Asia. New York, 1973.
21.
ChamblissW.State-organized crime. Criminology27(2): 215–230, May 1989.
22.
SharkeyJ.The Contra-drug trade-off. Common Cause Magazine, September/October 1988, pp. 23–33.
23.
StockwellJ.The CIA, drugs and the Contras. Guardian, May 1986.
24.
ChamblissW.The consequences of prohibition: Crime, corruption, and international narcotics control. In Drugs, Law, and the State, edited by TraverH. H.GaylordM. S., Hong Kong, 1992.
25.
Washington Post, January 6, 1994, p. A8.
26.
DaleyR.Prince of the City: The True Story of a Cop Who Knew Too Much. Boston, 1978.
27.
Washington Post, December 29, 1993, p. A1.
28.
HarrisonK.12 on D.C. force arrested in corruption probe. Washington Post, December 15, 1993, p. A1.
29.
GladwellM.In drug war, crime sometimes wears a badge. Washington Post, May 19, 1994, p. A1.
30.
Judge is first federal jurist convicted of taking birds. Los Angeles Times, June 30, 1992, p. A4.
31.
WoodwissM.Crime, Crusades, and Corruption: Prohibitions in the U.S., 1900–1987. Totowa, 1988.
32.
Noriega: How the Feds got their man. Newsweek, April 20, 1992, p. 37.
33.
GugliottaG.The sleaze connection. Washington Post, September 22, 1991, p. C1.
34.
SalamatA.Opiate of the frontier: Pakistani tribes find it hard to give up poppy crop. Far East. Econ. Rev.156: 18, May 27, 1993.
35.
The general and the cocaleros. Economist313: 40–41, December 9, 1989.
36.
Fighting drugs. Economist328: 39–40, August 7, 1987.
37.
ColettM.Cocaine capitalism. New Statesman and Society1: 14–17, August 12, 1988.
38.
The cocaine economies. Economist39: 21ff, October 8, 1988.
39.
GrimondJ.The other obstacles to change. Economist329: 25–27, November 13, 1993.
40.
Under the influence. Economist312: 38ff, September 30, 1989.
41.
LintnerB.Poisons and politics. Far East. Econ. Rev.154: 52–54, November 14, 1991.
42.
Sex, drugs and radicals. Economist311: 54ff, April 8, 1989.
43.
The cocaine economies: Latin America's killing fields. Economist309: 21ff, October 8, 1988.
44.
National Institute on Drug Abuse. Washington, D.C., 1994.
45.
News and Information Services, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, January 25, 1992.
46.
JohnstonL.O'MalleyP.BachmanJ.Monitoring the Future, Occasional Paper No. 9. Institute for Social Research, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1981.
47.
ChristieN.Crime Control as Industry. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London, 1993.
