Recently, Melburn D. Thurman has argued that my handling of the James Mackay manuscript, an early 19th-century account of Plains native groups, is unsound. Many of Thurman's criticisms, specifically those concerning the date of the document, the details of Mackay's experience on the Missouri River, and the intent of my original article, stem from misrepresentation and misunderstanding. Thurman has refused, for example, to accept that my essay was a test of the document using archaeological data associated with the Arikara. In addition, Thurman portrays a narrow view of the past and a rather unique understanding of ethnohistorical methods. In this response to Thurman, I restate many of the points in my original article and provide an alternative perspective for studying the past.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AbelAnnie Heloise (Ed.) 1932Chardon's Journal at Fort Clark, 1834–1839, Department of History, State of South Dakota, Pierre, SD.
2.
AxtellJames1978The Ethnohistory of Early America: A Review Essay, William and Mary Quarterly, 35, pp. 110–144.
3.
BeckerCarl L.1955What Are Historical Facts?, The Western Historical Quarterly, 7, pp. 327–340.
4.
CarmackRobert M.1972Ethnohistory: A Review of Its Development, Definitions, Methods, and Aims, Annual Review of Anthropology, 1, pp. 227–246.
5.
DarkPhilip1957Methods of Synthesis in Ethnohistory, Ethnohistory, 4, pp. 231–278.
6.
DavidsonJames West and LytleMark Hamilton1982After the Fact: The Art of Historical Detection, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY.
7.
DouglasWalter B.1964Manuel Lisa, annotated and edited by NasatirA. P., Argosy-Antiquarian, Ltd., New York, NY.
8.
DrummStella M. (Ed.) 1964Journal of a Fur-Trading Expedition on the Upper Missouri, 1812–1813 by John C. Luttig, Argosy-Antiquarian, Ltd., New York, NY.
9.
EwersJohn C.1961Symposium on the Concept of Ethnohistory: Comment, Ethnohistory, 8, pp. 262–270.
10.
FischerDavid Hackett1970Historians' Fallacies: Toward a Logic of Historical Thought, Harper and Row, New York, NY.
11.
HandlerJerome S. and LangeFrederick W.1978Plantation Slavery in Barbados: An Archaeological and Historical Investigation, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12.
JacksonDonald (Ed.) 1962Letters of the Lewis and Clark Expedition with Related Documents, 1783–1854, University of Illinois Press, Urbana, IL.
13.
McDermottJohn Francis (Ed.) 1952Journal of an Expedition to the Mauvaises Terres and the Upper Missouri in 1850 by Thaddeus A. Culbertson, Bureau of American Ethnology, Bulletin 147, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
14.
OglesbyRichard Edward1963Manuel Lisa and the Opening of the Missouri Fur Trade, University of Oklahoma Press, Norman, OK.
15.
OrserCharles E.Jr.1979Ethnohistory, Analogy, and Historical Archaeology, The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers, 13, pp. 1–24.
16.
OrserCharles E.Jr.1983The Explorer as Ethnologist: James Mackay's “Indian Tribes” Manuscript with a Test of His Comments on the Native Mortuary Customs of the Trans-Mississippi West, Ethnohistory, 30, pp. 15–34.
17.
OrserCharles E.Jr. and OwsleyDouglas W.1982Using Arikara Osteological Data to Evaluate an Assumption of Fur Trade Archaeology, Plains Anthropologist, 27, pp. 195–204.
18.
SalmonMerrilee H.1982Philosophy and Archaeology, Academic Press, New York, NY.
SouthStanley (Ed.) 1974A Debate on Ethnohistory, The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers, 7, pp. 202–229.
21.
SouthStanley (Ed.) 1977Neighings, Brayings, and Quack, Quack, About A Man Called Horse: The Dollar-Thurman Debate, The Conference on Historic Site Archaeology Papers, 10, pp. 165–231.
22.
ThurmanMelburn D.1982Plains Indian Winter Counts and the New Ethnohistory, Plains Anthropologist, 27, pp. 173–175.
23.
ThurmanMelburn D.1984“Covering the Dead” and Arikara Mortuary Practices, Plains Anthropologist, 29, pp. 61–63.
24.
ThurmanMelburn D.1987Recent Distortions of Ethnohistorical and Archaeological Data for the Arikaras and General Plains, North American Archaeologist, 8, pp. 1–12.
