Previous research on grandparents has focused on the individual and familial level and has characterized grandparent roles as ambiguous and contingent. Emphasizing instead structural phenomena, this theoretical paper argues that grandmother and grandfather roles are being institutionalized through state and federal legislation. This phenomenon provides an opportunity to investigate the process of institutionalization as it happens. Grandparenthood is evaluated as a potential site for institutionalization and law as a source of institutionalization is discussed. Preliminary evidence of the legal institutionalization of grandparenthood is presented and implications and directions for further research are suggested.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AldousJ. (1998). Public policy and grandparents: Contrasting perspectives. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on Grandparenthood (pp. 230–246). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
2.
AreenJ. (1992). Cases and materials on family law, (3rd ed.). Westbury, NY: The Foundation Press, Inc.
3.
BarineauS. C. C. (1984). Grandparental rights to visitation and custody: A trend in the right direction. Cumberland Law Review, 15, 161–178.
4.
BengtsonV. L. (1985). Diversity and symbolism in grandparental roles. In BengtsonV. L. & RobertsonJ. F. (Eds.). Grandparenthood (pp. 11–25). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
5.
BengtsonV. L.RosenthalC., & BurtonL. (1990). Families and aging: Diversity and heterogeneity. In BinstockR. H. & GeorgeL. K. (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (3rd ed.), (pp. 263–287). San Diego, CA: Academic Press, Inc.
6.
BergerP. L., & LuckmannT. (1980). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge.New York: Irvington Publishers.
7.
BostockC. (1994). Does the expansion of grandparent visitation rights promote the best interests of the child?: A survey of grandparent visitation laws in the fifty states. Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, 27(3), 319–393.
8.
BulcroftK.Van LeynseeleJ., & BorgattaE. F. (1989). Filial responsibility laws: Issues and state statutes. Research on Aging, 11, 374–373.
9.
BurnsE. M. (1991). Grandparent visitation rights: Is it time for the pendulum to fall?Family Law Quarterly, 25(1), 59–81.
10.
BurtonL. M. (1990). Teenage childbearing as an alternative life-course strategy in multigeneration black families. Human Nature, 1, 123–143.
11.
BurtonL. M., & BengtsonV. L. (1985). Black grandmothers: Issues of timing and continuity of roles. In BengtsonV. L. & RobertsonJ. F. (Eds.), Grandparenthood, (pp. 61–77). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
12.
California Commission on Government Organization and Economy. (1992). Mending our broken children: Restructuring foster care in California.
13.
CherlinA. (1978). Remarriage as an incomplete institution. American Journal of Sociology, 84, 634–650.
14.
CherlinA. J., & FurstenbergF. F.Jr. (1992). The new American grandparent: A place in the family, a life apart.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
15.
ClavanS. (1978). The impact of social class and social trends on the role of grandparent. The Family Coordinator, 27, 351–357.
16.
CunninghamD. E. (1996). The market and the life course. Unpublished dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
17.
DanielsM. B. (1992). The grandparents' rights issue: A sociological analysis. Unpublished dissertation, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.
18.
DonovanP. (1986). Will grandparent liability help curb teenage pregnancy?Family Planning Perspectives, 18, 264–268.
19.
EvanW. M. (1990). Social stucture and law: Theoretical and empirical perspectives.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
20.
FarkasJ. I., & HoganD. P. (1995). The demography of changing intergenerational relationships. In BengtsonV.SchaieK. W., & BurtonL. (Eds.), Intergenerational issues in aging.New York: Springer Publishing.
21.
GrayV. (1973). Innovation in the states: A diffusion study. American Political Science Review, 67, 1174–1185.
22.
HagestadG. O. (1985). Continuity and connectedness. In BengtsonV. L. & RobertsonJ. F. (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 31–48). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
23.
HillT. J. (1998). What's a grandparent to do?: Grandparents' legal rights and responsibilities to the family. Presentation at the American Sociological Association Annual Meeting, San Francisco, CA.
24.
HillT. J. (2000). Legally extending the family: An event history analysis of grandparent visitation rights laws. Journal of Family Issues, 21(2), 246–261.
25.
HodgsonL. G. (1992). Adult grandchildren and their grandparents: The enduring bond. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 34, 209–225.
26.
HunterA. G., & TaylorR. J. (1998). Grandparenthood in African American families. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 70–86). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
27.
JacksonA. M. (1994). The coming of age of grandparent visitation rights. American University Law Review, 43, 563–601.
28.
JacobH. (1992). The elusive shadow of the law. Law and Society Review, 26(3), 565–590.
29.
JendrekM. P. (1993). Grandparents who parent their grandchildren: Effects on lifestyle. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 609–621.
30.
JeppersonR. L. (1991). Institutions, institutional effects, and institutionalism. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 143–163). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
31.
JohnsonC. L. (1985). Grandparenting options in divorcing families: An anthropological perspective. In BengtsonV. L. & RobertsonJ. F. (Eds.), Grandparenthood (pp. 81–96). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
32.
JohnsonC. L. (1988). Ex familia: Grandparents, parents and children adjust to divorce.New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
33.
KamoY. (1998). Asian grandparents. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 97–112). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
34.
KennedyG. E. (1990). College students' expectations of grandparent and grandchild role behaviors. The Gerontologist, 30, 43–48.
35.
KennedyG. E. (1992). Quality in grandparent/grandchild relationships in International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 35, 83–98.
LarsonD. (1991). Grandparents: Redefining the role. In U.S. Congress, House of Representatives, Select Committee on Aging. Grandparents rights: Preserving generational bonds, reprinted from Modern Maturity, Dec. 1990–Jan. 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
38.
LissL. (1987). Family and the law. In SussmanM. B. & SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 767–793). New York: Plenum Press.
39.
Looking for a family resemblance: The limits of the functional approach to the legal definition of family. (1991). Harvard Law Review, 104, 1640–1659.
40.
MasonM. A. (1994). From father's property to children's rights: The history of child custody in the United States.New York: Columbia University Press.
41.
MertzE. (1994). A new social constructionism for sociolegal studies. Law and Society Review, 28(5), 1243–1265.
42.
MilovanovicD. (1994). A primer in the sociology of law (2nd ed.). New York: Harrow and Heston, Publishers.
43.
MinklerM., & RoeK. M. (1993). Grandmothers as caregivers: Raising children of the crack cocaine epidemic.Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
44.
MnookinR. H., & KornhauserL. (1979). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: The case of divorce. Yale Law Journal, 88, 950–997.
45.
NeugartenB., & WeinsteinK. (1964). The changing American grandparent. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 26, 100–204.
46.
PopenoeD. (1993). American family decline, 1960–1990: A review and appraisal. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 55, 527–555.
47.
RobertsonJ. F. (1977). Grandmotherhood: A study of role conceptions. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 39, 165–174.
48.
RosenfeldM. (1991). Grandparents' rights: Activists turn to court to protect their ties to grandchildren. In U. S. Congress, House of Representatvies, Select Committee on Aging. Grandparents Rights: Preserving Generational Bonds (pp. 226–227), reprinted from The Washington Post, Oct. 16, 1991. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
49.
RosowI. (1974). Socialization to old age.Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
50.
ScottW. R. (1991). Unpacking institutional arguments. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 164–182). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
51.
SiegelM. J. (1992). For better or for worse: Adultery, crime and the constitution. Journal of Family Law, 30, 45–95.
52.
SkocpolT. (1992). Protecting soldiers and mothers: The political origins of social policy in the United States.Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
53.
SpitzeG., & WardR. A. (1998). Gender variations. In SzionvaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 113–127). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
54.
SpreyJ., & MatthewsS. H. (1982). Contemporary grandparenthood: A systemic transition. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 464, 91–103.
55.
StromR., & StromS. (1997). Building a theory of grandparent development. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 45(4), 255–286.
56.
SussmanM. B. (1987). From the catbird seat: Observations on marriage and the family. In SussmanM. B.SteinmetzS. K. (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. xxxi–xlii). New York: Plenum Press.
57.
SzinovaczM. E. (1988a). Grandparents today: A demographic profile. The Gerontologist, 38(1), 37–52.
58.
SzinovaczM. E. (1988b). Grandparent research: Past, present, and future. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 1–20). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
59.
ThomasJ. L. (1989). Gender and perceptions of grandparenthood. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 269–282.
60.
ThomasJ. L. (1990). The grandparent role: A double bind. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 31, 169–177.
61.
TimberlakeE. M., & ChipunguS. S. (1992). Grandmotherhood: Contemporary meaning among African American middle-class grandmothers. Social Work, 37, 216–222.
62.
TrollL. E. (1983). Grandparents: The family watchdogs. In BrubakerT. H. (Ed.), Family Relationships in Later Life (pp. 63–74). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.
63.
TrollL. E. (1986). Introduction. In TrollL. E. (Ed.), Family issues in current gerontology (pp. 301–311). New York: Springer Publishing Company.
64.
TrygstadD. W., & SandersG. F. (1989). The significance of stepgrandparents. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 29, 119–134.
65.
TurnerJ. H. (1997). The institutional order: Economy, kinship, religion, polity, law, and education in evolutionary and comparative perspective.New York: Addision-Wesley Educational Publishers Inc.
66.
WeinsteinJ. D. (1986). Adultery, law, and the state: A history. The Hastings Law Journal, 38, 195–238.
67.
WilliamsN., & TorrezD. J. (1998). Grandparenthood among Hispanics. In SzinovaczM. E. (Ed.), Handbook on grandparenthood (pp. 87–96). Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
68.
WoodV., & RobertsonJ. F. (1976). The significance of grandparenthood. In GubriumJ. F. (Ed.), Time, roles, and self in old age (pp. 278–304). New York: Human Sciences Press.
69.
WulczynF. H., & GoergeR. M. (1992). Foster care in New York and Illinois: The challenge of rapid change. Social Service Review, 66, 278–294.
70.
ZuckerL. G. (1991). The role of institutionalization in cultural persistence. In PowellW. W. & DiMaggioP. J. (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 83–107). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
