This article describes the design and evaluation of a formal writing assessment program within a technical writing course. Our purpose in this base-line study was to evaluate student writing at the conclusion of the course. In implementing this evaluation, we addressed fundamental issues of sound assessment: reliability and validity. Our program may encourage others seeking to assess educational outcomes in technical writing courses.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
WitteS. P.TraschelM., and WaltersK., Literacy and the Direct Assessment of Writing: A Diachronic Perspective, in Writing Assessment: Issues and Strategies, GreenbergK.WienerH. S., and DonovanR. A. (eds.), Longman, New York, pp. 13–34, 1986.
2.
ElliotN.PlataM., and ZelhartP., A Program Development Handbook for the Holistic Assessment of Writing, University Press of America, Baltimore, 1990.
3.
CampR., Proposal for Writing Portfolio Project, Phases I and II and Progress Report for Writing Portfolio Project, Phase I, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey, 1982.
4.
ElbowP., and BelanoffP.Portfolios as a Substitute for Proficiency Examinations, College Composition and Communication, 37:3, pp. 336–339, 1986.
5.
BelanoffP. and ElbowP.Using Portfolios to Increase Collaboration and Community in a Writing Program, Writing Program Administration, 9:3, pp. 27–40, 1986.
6.
Hamp-LyonsL. and CondonW., Readers' Responses to Portfolios, presented at the Eighth Annual National Testing Network in Writing Conference on Language and Literacy Assessment, New York, 1990.
7.
DaikerD.HammondD. J., and SommersJ., Using a Writing Portfolio for Placement in College Composition, Notes from the National Testing Network in Writing, City University of New York, New York, 10, pp. 2–3, 1991.
8.
American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, National Council on Measurement in Education, Standards for Educational and Psychological Testing, American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., 1985.
9.
HuotB.The Literature of Direct Writing Assessment: Major Concerns and Prevailing Trends, Review of Educational Research, 60, pp. 237–263, 1990.
10.
HuotB.Reliability, Validity, and Holistic Scoring: What We Know and What We Need to Know, College Composition and Communication, 41:2, pp. 201–213, 1990.
11.
GodshalkF.I.SwinefordF., and CoffmanW. E., The Measurement of Writing Ability, Educational Testing Service, Princeton, New Jersey, 1966.
12.
WhiteE. M.Review of Portfolios: Process and Product, BelanoffP. and DicksonM. (eds.), College Composition and Communication, 43:4, pp. 537–539, 1992.
13.
RoemerM.SchultzL. M., and DurstR. K.Portfolios and the Process of Change, College Composition and Communication, 42:4, pp. 455–468, 1991.
14.
PurvesA. C.Reflections on Research and Assessment in Written Composition, Research in the Teaching of English, 26:1, pp. 108–122, 1992.
15.
LauerJ. M. and AsherJ. W., Composition Research: Empirical Design, Oxford, New York, 1988.
16.
BrelandH. M., Assessing Writing Skills, College Entrance Examination Board, New York, 1987.
17.
CrusiusT. W., Discourse: A Critique and Synthesis of Major Theories, Modern Language Association, New York, 1989.
18.
BishopW.Revising the Technical Writing Class: Peer Critiques, Self-Evaluation, and Portfolio Grading, The Technical Writing Teacher, 16:1, pp. 13–25, 1989.
19.
WhiteE. M., Teaching and Assessing Writing: Recent Advances in Understanding, Evaluating, and Improving Student Performance, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 1985.
20.
McKendyT.Locally Developed Writing Tests and The Validity of Holistic Scoring, Research in the Teaching of English, 26:2, pp. 149–166, 1992.
21.
NunnallyJ. C., Psychometric Theory, (2nd Edition) McGraw-Hill, New York, 1978.
22.
WitteS. P. and FaigleyL., Evaluating College Writing Programs, Southern Illinois University Press, Carbondale, Illinois, 1986.
23.
McClainC. J. and KruegerD. W., Using Outcomes Assessment: A Case Study in Institutional Change, in Assessing Educational Outcomes, EwellP. (ed.), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, pp. 33–46, 1985.
24.
ElliotNorbertKatzEric, and LynchRobertThe Challenger Tragedy: A Case Study in Organizational Communication and Professional Ethics, Journal of Business and Professional Ethics, 12:2, 1993 (in press).
25.
BaratRobert and ElliotNorbert, The Complete Chemical Engineer: A Guide to Critical Thinking, Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa, 1993.
26.
LynchRobert, Large Scale Assessment in an Age of Autonomy, Proceedings of The Fourth International Conference on Assessing Quality in Higher Education, Center for Assessment Research and Development, Knoxville, Tennesssee, 1992.
27.
ElliotNorbert and LynchRobert, Professional Writing: Tasks for Undergraduate Students in Technological Universities, Ginn, Needham Heights, Massachusetts, 1993.
28.
LynchRobert and SwanzeyThomas (eds.), The Example of Science: An Anthology for College Composition, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1981.
29.
ElliotNorbert and KilduffMargaretTechnical Writing in a Technological University: Attitudes of Department Chairs, Journal of Technical Writing and Communications, 24, pp. 411–424, 1991.
