Nineteen visual artists and eighteen actors were compared to twenty-one imaginative controls, matched for high levels of imaginative absorption, all subjects female. Creatives had mystical experiences significantly more frequently than controls. In particular, the visual artists reported having had significantly more current, positive altered states of consciousness (lucid and archetypal-mythological dreaming, out of body experiences, and waking mystical experiences). These findings, taken with the fact that the creatives did not show a significantly greater tendency toward psychopathology as indexed by the multiple measures of trauma and emotional conflict, suggest that contrary to the stereotype, creatives may not be driven by conflict so much as by intense and constructive states of consciousness. Most previous studies of productive creatives have used lower absorption controls, making it more difficult to locate specific factors that make imaginative subjects into productive artists and actors.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
AlexanderC. N.DaviesJ. L.DixonC. N.DillbeckM. C.OetzelK. M.MuehlmanJ. K., & Orme-JohnsonD. W. (1990). Higher stages of consciousness beyond formal operations: The Vedic psychology of human development. In AlexanderC. N. & LangerE. J. (eds.), Higher stages of human development: Adult growth beyond formal operations (286–341). New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
AtwellC. & WellsF. (1937). Wide range multiple-choice vocabulary tests. Journal of Applied Psychology, 21, 550–555.
3.
BarronF. (1969). Creative person and creative process.New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, Inc.
4.
BemS. (1974). Sex role adaptability: One consequence of psychological androgeny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31:4, 634–643.
5.
EysenckH. J., & EysenckS. B. G. (1968). Eysenck Personality Inventory.San Diego, California: Educational and Industrial Testing Service.
6.
EysenckH. J. (1995). Genius: The natural history of creativity.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7.
FisherS., & FisherR. L. (1981). Pretend the world is funny and forever: A psychological analysis of comedians, clowns and actors.Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
8.
GackenbachJ., & BosveldJ. (1989). Control your dreams.New York: Harper and Row.
9.
GackenbachJ.SnyderT. J.RokesL. M., & SachauD. (1986). Lucid dreaming frequency in relation to vestibular sensitivity as measured by caloric stimulation. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 7, 277–298.
10.
HarrisC. T.PerriconeP. J., & SmithM. S. (1988). The artist and androgeny: A study of gender identity in visual artists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6:1, 67–68.
11.
HilgardJ. R. (1970). Personality and hypnosis: A study of imaginative involvement.Chicago, Illinois: University of Chicago Press.
12.
HoodR. W. (1975). The construction and preliminary validation of a measure of reported mystical experience. Journal of the Scientific Study of Religion, 14, 29–41.
13.
HuntH. (1995). The nature of consciousness: Cognitive, phenomenological and trans***personal perspectives.New Haven, Yale University Press.
14.
HuntH. T.GervaisA.Shearing-JohnsS., & TravisF. (1992). Transpersonal experiences of childhood: An exploratory empirical study of selected adult groups. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 75, 1135–1153.
15.
HuntH., & PophamC. (1987). Metaphor and states of consciousness: A preliminary correlational study of presentational thinking. Journal of Mental Imagery, 11, 83–100.
16.
LudwigA. M. (1992). Creative achievement and psychopathology: A comparison among professions. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 46:3, 330–356.
17.
LynneS. J., & RhueJ. W. (1988). Fantasy proneness: Hypnosis, developmental antecedents and psychopathology. American Psychologist, 43, 35–44.
18.
MacKinnonD. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In NeilsonG. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the XIV International Congress of Applied Psychology. Copenhagen, 1961, 2, 11–39. Copenhagen, Munksgaard.
19.
McCraeR. R., & CostaP. T.Jr. (1983). Joint factors in self reports and ratings: Neuroticism, extraversion and openness to experience. Personality and Individual Differences, 4, 245–255.
20.
RamachandranV. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Consciousness and Cognition, 4:1, 22–51.
21.
RocheS. M., & McConkeyK. M. (1990). Absorption: Nature, assessment and correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59:1, 91–101.
22.
SchilderP. (1942). Mind: Perception and thought in their constructive aspects.New York: Colombia University Press.
23.
SpadaforaA., & HuntH. T. (1990). The multiplicity of dreams: Cognitive-affective correlates of lucid, archetypal, and nightmare dreaming. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 71, 627–644.
24.
SpanosM. P., & MorettiP. (1988). Correlates of mystical and diabolical experiences in a sample of female university students. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 27, 105–116.
25.
TellegenA., & AtkinsonG. (1974). Openness to absorbing and self-altering experiences (absorption), a trait related to hypnotic susceptibility. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 83, 268–277.
26.
WinnerF.CaseyM. B.DaSilvaD., & HayesR. (1991). Spatial abilities and reading deficits in visual art students. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9:1, 51–63.
