The purpose of this article is to examine barriers to technology adoption based on the literature and on data from two studies (the first with K-12 teachers and the second with higher education faculty in a state system). A product of this examination is a visual representation, a model of the interactions and the interdependence of elements that contribute to the construction of barriers to technology adoption. It is intended that the model will clarify internal and external obstacles, and serve as an aid to pre-service and in-service teacher education curriculum designers and developers as they plan for the successful infusion of newer technologies in the curriculum.
BorrellJ., America's Shame: How We've Abandoned Our Children's Future, Macworld, pp. 25–30, September, 1992.
3.
KerrS. T., Technology, Teachers, and the Search for School Reform, Educational Technology Research and Development, 37: 4, pp. 5–17, 1990.
4.
WitteG., CCStaff Development RE: Technology Adoption. [electronic listserv]. Available e-mail: crc-request@listserv.classroom.com Message: Subscribe CCStaff Development CDTLGWWJPL, December 1998.
5.
RieberL. P. and WelliverP. W., Infusing Educational Technology into Mainstream Educational Computing, International Journal of Instructional Media, 16: 1, pp. 21–32, 1989.
6.
HooperS. and RieberL. P., Teaching with Technology, Teaching: Theory into Practice, OrnsteinA. (ed.), Allyn and Bacon, Boston, Massachusetts, 1995.
Unidentified Teacher, Personal Communication at the Annual National Art Education Association Convention, Houston, Texas, 1995.
9.
MarcinkiewiczH. R. and WittmanT. K., Tracking Teachers' Personal Variables and Computer Use: Phase Two, Paper presented at the National Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Anaheim, California, 1995.
10.
SalomonG.PerkinsD. N. and GlobersonT., Partners in Cognition: Extending Human Intelligence with Intelligent Technologies, Educational Researcher, 20: 3, pp. 2–9, 1991.
11.
JonassenD. H.CampbellJ. P., and DavidsonM. E., Learning with Media: Restructuring the Debate, Educational Technology Research and Development, 42: 2, pp. 31–39, 1994.
12.
LovejoyM., Postmodern Currents: Art and Artists in the Age of Electronic Media, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1992.
13.
BereiterC., Constructivism, Socioculturalism, and Popper's World 3, Educational Researcher, 23: 7, pp. 21–23, 1994.
14.
MarcinkiewiczH. R. and GrabowskiB., The Relationship of Personological Variables to Computer Use by Elementary School Teachers: Report of Phase One—Baseline Data (IR015748), in Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, Research, and Theory Division, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED348011, 1992.
15.
AndersonR. E. (ed.), Computers in American Schools 1992: An Overview, IEA Computers in Education Study, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 1993.
16.
BeckerH. J., Top-Down versus Grass Roots Decision Making about Computer Acquisition and Use in American Schools, paper presented at the Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, San Francisco, California, 1986.
17.
SchiemanE. and FiordoR., Barriers to Adoption of Instructional Communications Technology in Higher Education, paper presented at the Australian Communications Conference, Melbourne, Australia, July 1990.
18.
HarveyJ. and PurnellS., Technology and Teacher Professional Development, Department of Education, Washington, D.C., ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 580, 1995.
19.
Appalachia Educational Lab and Tennessee Education Association, Bits, Bytes, and Barriers: Tennessee Teachers' Use of Technology, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 580, 1991.
20.
Quality Education Data, Inc., Malarkey-Taylor Associates, Education Technology Survey, 1995, ERIC Reproduction Service No. ED 387 124, 1995.
21.
SpottsT. H. and BowmanM. A., Increasing Faculty Use of Instructional Technology: Barriers and Incentives, Educational Media International, 30: 4, pp. 199–204, 1993.
22.
HopeW. C., Microcomputer Technology: Its Impact on Teachers in an Elementary School, unpublished doctoral dissertation, Florida State University, 1995.
23.
RayD., Technology and Restructuring—Part II: New Organizational Directions, The Computing Teacher, 18: 7, pp, 8–12, 1991.
24.
ByersA., Communities Address Barriers to Connectivity, Rural Clearinghouse for Lifelong Education, Kansas State University, Kansas, ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 343 580, 1996.
25.
RogersP. L., Adoption of Computer-Based Technologies among Art Educators: Implications for Instructional Design in Art Education, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, 1997.
26.
Lundy-DobbertM.EisikovitsR. A., and PitmanM. A., Observing Learning in Everyday Settings: A Guide to the Holistic Study of Cultural Transmission/Acquisition in the Daily Lives of Children and Youth, A Field Guide Produced for the Culture Acquisition Research and Policy Consortium, 1994.
27.
MilesM. B. and HubermanA. M., Qualitative Data Analysis, Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand Oaks, 1994.
28.
RogersP. L., A System-Wide Examination of the Electronic Academy, Minnesota State Colleges and Universities, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1998.
29.
PillerC., Separate Realities (The Creation of the Technological Underclass in America's Public Schools), Macworld, pp. 218–236, September 1992.
30.
MenasC., CCStaff Development RE: Technology Adoption, [electronic listserv]. Available e-mail: crc-request@listserv.classroom.com Message: Subscribe CCStaff Development CDTLGWWJPL, December 1998.
