Is literary meaning amenable to an explanation within the cognitive paradigm of psychology? A convention-oriented explanation exists as opposed to an autonomous ontology of meaning. The central difficulty of explanation is its lack of empirical bases. The hypothesis that encoding—which is action and goal specific—and retrieval are activated by specific conventions and caused by different types of elaboration and inference is tested. The dependent variables were studied in a 2 × 2 free recall experiment. The hypothesis mentioned was tested in a 2 × 2 × 2 recognition experiment. The results for a cognitive conception of literary meaning are significant. The methodological and theoretical consequences are discussed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BransfordJ. D.BarclayJ. R., and FranksJ. J., Sentence Memory: A Constructive Versus Interpretative Approach, Cognitive Psychology, 3, pp. 193–209, 1972.
2.
HörmannH., Meinen und Verstehen, Frankfurt, 1978.
3.
PichertJ. W. and AndersonR. C., Taking Different Perspectives on a Story, Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, pp. 309–315, 1977.
4.
JenkinsJ. J., Four Points to Remember: A Tetrahedral Model of Memory Experiments, in Levels of Processing and Human Memory, CermakL. S. and CraikF. I. M. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1979.
5.
AndersonR. C., Schema-Directed Processes in Language Comprehension, in Cognitive Psychology and Instruction, LesgoldA. M.PellegrinoG. W.FokkemaS. D. and GlaserR. (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1978.
6.
RumelhartD. E., Schemata: The Building Blocks of Cognition, in Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, SpiroR.BruceB. and BrewerW. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1980.
7.
BowerF. H.BlackJ. B., and TurnerT. J., Scripts in Memory for Text, Cognitive Psychology, pp. 177–220, 1979.
8.
BelezzaF. S. and BowerG. H., The Representational and Processing Characteristics of Scripts, Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 18, pp. 1–4, 1981.
9.
BelezzaF. S. and BowerG. H., Remembering Script-based Text, Poetics, 11, pp. 1–23, 1982.
10.
AndersonR. C. and PichertJ. W., Recall of Previously Unrecallable Information Following a Shift in Perspective, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, pp. 1–12, 1978.
11.
ThorndykeP. W. and YekowichF. R., A Critique of Schema-based Theories of Human Story Memory, Poetics, 9, pp. 23–49, 1980.
12.
CollinsA.BrownJ. C., and LarkyK. M., Inference in Text Understanding, in Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, SpiroJ. R.BruceB. C. and BrewerW. F. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1980.
13.
CarbonellJ. E., Subjective Understanding: Computer Models of Belief Systems, University Research Press, Ann Arbor, Michigan, 1981.
14.
BowerG. H., Plans and Goals in Understanding Episodes, in Discourse Processing, FlammerA. and KintschW. (eds.), North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1982.
15.
KintschW. and GreeneE., The Role of Culture-specific Schemata in the Comprehension and Recall of Stories, Discourse Processes, 1, pp. 1–13, 1978.
16.
van DijkT. A. and KintschW., Strategies of Discourse Comprehension, Academic Press, New York, 1983.
17.
de BeaugrandeR., Poetry and the Ordinary Reader: A Study of Immediate Responses, Empirical Studies of the Arts, 3, pp. 1–21, 1985.
18.
BrewerW. F., Literary Theory, Rhetoric and Stylistics: Implications for Psychology, in Theoretical Issues in Reading Comprehension, SpiroJ. R.BruceB. C. and BrewerW. F. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1980.
19.
van DijkT. A., Literature and Cognition, Paper, Malaga, 1978.
20.
SpiroR. J., Prior Knowledge and Story Processing: Integration, Selection and Variation, Poetics, 9, pp. 313–327, 1980.
21.
BrewerW. F. and HayA. E., Reconstructive Recall of Linguistic Style, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 23, pp. 237–249, 1984.
22.
HintzenbergD.SchmidtS. J., and ZobelR., Zum Literaturbegriff in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland, Braunschweig, Wiesbaden, 1980.
23.
MeutschD. and SchmidtS. J., On the Role of Conventions in Understanding Literature, Poetics, 14, pp. 551–574, 1985.
24.
SchmidtS. J., Foundation of the Empirical Science of Literature, Buske, Hamburg, 1982.
25.
VipondD. and HuntR. A., Point Driven Understanding: Pragmatic and Cognitive Dimensions of Literary Reading, Poetics, 13:3, pp. 261–277, 1984.
26.
HuntR. A. and VipondD., Crash-testing a Transactional Model of Literary Reading, paper presented at the colloquium “The New Rhetoric and The New Literary Theory,” Department of English, Carnegie-Mellon University, Pittsburgh, 1985.
27.
MandlH. and BallstaedtS.-P., Effects of Elaboration on Recall of Texts, in Discourse Processing, FlammerA. and KintschW. (eds.), Amsterdam, 1982.
28.
SchmidtS. J., Fictionality in Literary and Nonliterary Discourse, Poetics, 9, pp. 525–546, 1980.
29.
DoolingD. J. and ChristiaansenR. E., Levels of Encoding and Retention of Prose, in The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 11, BowerG. H. (ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1977.
30.
FredericsenC. H., Acquisition of Semantic Information from Discourse: Effects of Repeated Exposures, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 14, pp. 158–169, 1975.
31.
FredericsenC. H., Effects of Context-Enduced Processing, Cognitive Psychology, 7, pp. 139–166, 1975.
32.
RickheitG. and KockH., Inference Processes in Text Comprehension, in Psycholinguistic Studies in Language Processing, RickheitG. and BockM. (eds.), deGruyter, Berlin, 1983.
33.
Hoppe-GraffS., Verstehen als kognitiver Prozess. Psychologische Ansätze und Beiträge zum Textverstehen, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik (LiLi), 14, pp. 10–37, 55, 1984.
34.
TerganS. O., Diagnose von Wissensstrukturen, Forschungsbericht Nr. 30 des Deutschen Instituts für Fernstudien an der Universität Tübingen, 1984.
35.
HuberG. L. and MandlH., Verbale Daten, Beltz, Weinheim, 1982.
36.
BrommeR. and HömbergE., Methodische Probleme und Möglichkeiten der Undersuchung sprachlich gefaßter handlungsregulierender Kognitionen, in Beiträge zur psychologischen Handlungstheorie, VolpertW. (ed.), H. Huber, Stuttgant, Wien, 1980.
37.
NündelE. and SchlotthausW., Angenommen: Agamemnon. Wie Lehrer mit Texten umgehen, Urban and Schwarzenberg, München, 1978.
38.
ViehoffR., Aspects of Literary Socialization in Children: Can Children Really Receive and Understand Texts as Literary Texts?Poetics, 11, pp. 345–369, 1982.
39.
MillerJ. R. and KintschW., Readability and Recall of Short Prose Passages, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, pp. 335–354, 1980.
40.
MeutschD., Wie entsteht ein verständlicher Text? Einflüsse literarischer und nicht-literarischer Kontexte aüf zielspezifische Verstehensprozesse, Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik, 55, pp. 86–112, 1984.
41.
MeutschD., Literatur verstehen. Eine empirische Studie, Vieweg, Braunschweig und Wiesbaden, 1986.
42.
TurnerA. and GreeneE., The Construction and Use of a Propositional Textbase, Technical Report No. 63, Institute for the Study of Intellectual Behavior, University of Colorado, Boulder, 1977.
43.
LienertG. A., Verteilungsfreie Methoden der Biostatistik, Meisenheim, 1973.
44.
SchnotzW.BallstaedtSt.-P., and MandlH., Lernen mit Texten aus handlungstheoretischer Sicht, in Zur Psychologie der Textverarbeitung, MandlH. (ed.), Urban and Schwarzenberg, München-Wien-Baltimore, 1981.
45.
MeutschD. and ViehoffR. (eds.), The Processing of Literary Discourse. Aspects of Interdisciplinary Approaches, DeGuyter, Berlin, 1986.
46.
SpiroR. J., Remembering Information from Text: The “State of Schema” Approach, in Schooling and the Acquisition of Knowledge, AndersonR. C.SpiroR. J., and MontagueW. E. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1977.
47.
SpiroR. J., Accommodative Reconstruction in Prose Recall, Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, pp. 84–95, 1980.
48.
EckgoldF. and MeutschD., GIS. Die Gruppen-innerhalb-Stufen-Varianzanalyse zur Reduktion von Fehlerkomponenten. Anwendungsmöglichkeiten, Theorie und Designs bis zum dreifaktoriellen Fall, LUMIS-Schriften 3 aus dem Institut für Empirische Literatur—und Medienforschung, Siegen, 1984.
49.
MeutschD. and ViehoffR., Literary Discourse. Empirical Results, in From Verbal Language to Symbolic Constitution, OliviT. and PetöfiJ. S. (eds.), Buske, Hamburg, in press.
50.
BlackJ. B.GalambosJ. A., and ReiserB. J., Coordinating Discovery and Verification Research, in New Methods in Reading Comprehension Research, KierasD. E. and JustM. A. (eds.), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, New Jersey, 1984.
