Analysis of survey data on six health professions in Michigan suggests the extent to which sex-role stereotypes are reflected in the distribution of women within and among those professions which typically function as independent practitioners. The particular emphasis of the analysis is the structural or organizational aspects of the professions which facilitate or hinder the recruitment and participation of women. Distribution of women among professions is associated with relative levels of sex-segregation and with the relative availability of career opportunities in nonentrepreneurial settings. Implications of these findings for future trends in the sex structure of the health professions are discussed and a research agenda on women health professionals is proposed.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
BlitzR.C.Women in the professions, 1870–1970. Monthly Labor Review97(5): 34–39, 1974.
2.
EpsteinC.Encountering the male establishment: Sex status limits women's careers in the professions. Am. J. Sociol. 75(6): 965–982, 1970.
3.
NavarroV.Women in health care. N. Engl. J. Med.292: 398–402, 1975.
4.
SadlerA. M.SadlerB. L., and BlissA. A.The Physician's Assistant, Today and Tomorrow, pp. 34–37. Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, 1972.
5.
JonesA. R., and TaylorL.Differential recruitment of female professionals: A case study of clergywomen. In The Professional Woman, edited by TheodoreA., pp. 355–362. Schenkman Publishing Company, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.
6.
OppenheimerV. K.The Female Labor Force in the United States: Demographic and Economic Factors Governing Its Growth and Changing Composition, pp. 77–83. Population Monograph Series No. 5. University of California, Berkeley, 1970.
7.
World Health Statistics Annual 1966, Vol. III, pp. 237–241. Health Personnel and Hospital Establishments, World Health Organization, Geneva, 1970.
8.
DubeW. F.Women students in U.S. medical schools: Past and present. JAMA48: 186–189, 1973.
9.
BishelP. J.HammelE. A., and O'ConnellJ. W.Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science187: 398–404, 1975.
10.
AckerJ., and Van HoutonD. R.Differential recruitment and control: The sex structuring of organization. Administrative Sciences Quarterly19(2): 152–163, 1974.
11.
StevensonM.Women's wages and job segregation. Politics and Society4(1): 93–96, 1973.
12.
WaldmanE., and McEaddyB. J.Where women work-Analysis of industry and occupation. Monthly Labor Review97(5): 3–13, 1974.
13.
GoodeW. M.Community within a community: The professions. Am. Sociol. Rev.22: 194–200, 1957.
14.
EpsteinC.Woman's Place. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1970.
15.
WhiteM. S.Psychological and social barriers to women in science. Science170: 413–416, 1970.
16.
ReederL. G.The patient-client as consumer: Some observations on the changing patient-client relationship. J. Health Soc. Behav.13(4): 406–412, 1972.
17.
KosaJ., and CokerR. E.The female physician in public health: Conflict and reconciliation of the sex and professional roles. Sociology and Social Research49: 294–305, 1965.
18.
FreidsonE.Client control and medical practice. In Patients, Physicians and Illness, edited by JacoE. G., pp. 214–221. Free Press, New York, 1972.
19.
WilliamsJ. J.Patients and prejudices: Attitudes toward women physicians. Am. J. Sociol. 51: 283–287, 1946.
20.
GrossE.Plus ça change … ? The sexual structure of occupations over time. Social Problems16(2): 198–208, 1968.
21.
TashR. H.Women in the professional work force. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.NS13(11): 622–624, 1973.
22.
McNerneyW. J.Hospital and Medical Economics, Vol. I, p. 706. Hospital Research and Educational Trust, Chicago, 1962.
23.
Health Resources Statistics, 1972–1973, p. 258. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, National Center for Health Statistics, Pub. No. (HSM) 73-1509, Rockville, Md., 1973.
24.
Statistics on women in medicine and addendum to publicity and public relations 1972 annual report.Journal of the American Women's Medical Association28(11): 600–602, 1973.
25.
Profile of Practice, 1973 edition. American Medical Association, Chicago, 1973.
26.
SchwirianP. M.Occupational roles of Ohio's practicing pharmacists. J. Am. Pharm. Assoc.NS13(11): 618–621, 1973.
27.
LopateC.Women in Medicine, pp. 124–127. Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1969.
28.
OwensA.Women doctors: Still earning less, but trying harder. Medical Economics, pp. 154–163, March 22, 1976.
29.
JussimJ., and MullerC.Medical education and women: How good an investment?J. Med. Educ.50(6): 571–580, 1975.
30.
HeinsM. J., Wayne State University School of Medicine, personal communication, 1976.
31.
PowersL.ParmelleR., and WeisenfelderH.Practice patterns of women and men physicians. J. Med. Educ.41: 481–491, 1969.
32.
MarchJ., and SimonH.Organizations, p. 101. J. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, 1958.
33.
The Virginia Slims American Women's Opinion Poll, Vol. III, pp. 3 and 31. Roper Organization, Inc., New York, 1974.
FuchsV. R.A note on sex segregation in professional occupations. Explorations in Economic Research2(1): 105–111, 1975.
36.
KirkK. W., and OhvallR. A.Sex differences in pharmacy student career planning and aspirations. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education39: 37–40, 1975.
37.
WilliamsP. A.Women in medicine: Some themes and variations. J. Med. Educ.46(7): 584–591, 1971.
38.
KosaJ.Women in medicine in a changing world. In The Professional Woman, edited by TheodoreA., pp. 709–719. Schenkman Publishing Company, Cambridge, 1971.
